Virtual growth, more users, real problems, less money, 19 billion in losses – and young people aren't buying anything except free-to-play games

Xpert Pre-Release

Language selection 📢

Published on: March 14, 2026 / Updated on: March 14, 2026 – Author: Konrad Wolfenstein

Virtual growth, more users, real problems, less money, 19 billion in losses – and young people aren't buying anything except free-to-play games

Virtual growth, more users, real problems, less money, 19 billion in losses – and young people aren't buying anything but free-to-play games – Image: Xpert.Digital

The $19 billion hole: Meta's VR strategy fails spectacularly against reality

70 billion burned: Why Mark Zuckerberg's VR dream is becoming an expensive nightmare

The GDC stage: Optimism against all evidence

In early March 2026, Chris Pruett, Meta's Director of Content Ecosystem, took to the podium at the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco and uttered words that simultaneously caught the attention of the industry and raised eyebrows. The Quest ecosystem—by far the world's largest VR marketplace—had reached its highest number of unique users to date in 2025. Rumors of VR's demise were greatly exaggerated, Pruett wrote in a blog post following his presentation. It was a defensive message—and with good reason.

The context in which these statements were made was anything but comfortable. Just a few weeks earlier, Meta had announced it would be laying off more than 1,000 employees in its Reality Labs division and closing almost all of its first-party game studios. The affected studios—including Armature, Twisted Pixel, and Sanzaru—had supplied the Quest ecosystem with exclusive content for years. The resulting picture was that of a company simultaneously announcing growth and dismantling its core business—a contradiction that gave observers pause.

Reality Labs, the division responsible for VR and AR, reported an operating loss of $19.193 billion for the full year 2025—a further increase from the $17.729 billion loss in 2024. Since 2020, Reality Labs' total losses have exceeded $70 billion. The division's revenue—primarily from sales of Quest headsets and Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses—amounted to approximately $1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2025 alone. This represents the widest gap between costs and revenues ever recorded.

The Game Developers Conference (GDC) in San Francisco is the world's largest and most important conference for video game developers. This year, the event took place from March 9th to 13th, 2026.
Game Developers Conference (GDC) is an annual industry event held at the Moscone Center, comprising a trade show, expert presentations, and networking events. The conference covers all facets of game development, including programming, game design, visual arts, audio, and business management. Prestigious awards such as the Game Developers Choice Awards and the Independent Games Festival are also presented during the conference.
The event is so important because it brings together the entire global games industry, from developers and artists to major publishers and technology platforms, in one place. Leading industry representatives present the latest technological innovations, software tools, and market trends. As a result, the trade fair acts as a central driving force for the further development of interactive media and is the most important platform for knowledge exchange, career opportunities, and business development in the gaming world.

Growth that no one can measure

The core problem with Meta's VR communications isn't new, but it remains unresolved: The company reports growth in categories that defy independent verification. Pruett spoke of the "highest number of unique users"—yet Meta has remained silent about the actual number of active VR users for more than a decade. How many millions of people own a Quest headset is one thing; how many use it regularly, intensively, and in a way that allows for genuine monetization is quite another.

This distinction is not purely academic. Numerous market analysts have pointed out that the rate of active usage—that is, the number of hours an average Quest owner spends with the device each week—has likely declined significantly since the peak of the Quest 2 era. Meta itself admitted last year that the enthusiasts who once built the ecosystem are considerably less active and spend significantly less money than they did a few years ago. They have been replaced by a new demographic: teenagers, who now represent the most active user group—but have considerably less purchasing power.

The software revenues of the Quest ecosystem reflect this trend. After a 12 percent increase in 2024, growth slowed considerably in 2025. Pruett refrained from citing an absolute figure, instead pointing to the generally slow growth of the gaming industry as a whole – a statement that reveals more about uncertainty than strategy. However, the cumulative Quest content spending of over two billion US dollars since the ecosystem's inception was readily discussed – a figure that sounds impressive but seems alarmingly small in light of the billions invested.

🗒️ Xpert.Digital: A pioneer in the field of Extended and Augmented Reality

Finding the right Metaverse agency, planning office, or consulting firm - Image: Xpert.Digital

🗒️ Finding the right Metaverse agency, planning office, or consulting firm – Search and search: Top Ten Tips for Consulting & Planning

More information here:

Experts in the Metaverse and XR: Find the right partners

Trapped in their own trap: How Meta dominates the VR market and yet fails

The Teenager Trap: Popular, but not profitable

Meta's current user base reveals a structural dilemma. The young people aged 13 to 24 who flocked to the platform with the release of the Quest 3S are enthusiastic VR users – but not a profitable target group. Their preferences are clear: free, meme-culture-driven multiplayer games like Gorilla Tag, not expensive premium productions with Hollywood production values. The most costly example of this misinvestment was "Batman: Arkham Shadow," a Meta exclusive produced with a substantial budget – whose sequel was promptly canceled as the first official act after the layoffs.

Pruett himself drew the conclusion from this realization and formulated it unusually frankly: Big-budget AAA games with Hollywood-style presentation are simply too expensive for today's market. This statement is nothing less than a public capitulation to the core promise of the enthusiast VR market. At the same time, premium software remains the most important revenue driver – not microtransactions. A dilemma: The affluent target group wants premium, but that affluent target group is shrinking.

Meta is therefore making a two-pronged bet on the future. On the one hand, the company hopes that today's VR teenagers will grow up to become tomorrow's high-spending core users – the first true "VR natives" for whom immersive technology is a natural extension of their entertainment world. On the other hand, Meta hopes to attract a new target group of media-savvy adults who will initially use VR headsets as a television replacement and, in the process, become VR gamers. Both bets have one thing in common: they currently exist primarily as strategic hypotheses, not as proven market realities.

The strategic course change and its costs

Meta's reaction to the disappointing growth follows a clear logic: withdrawal from its own game development, a focus on third-party developers, and a realignment towards classic VR experiences instead of the unpopular Metaverse. In 2024, Meta, through Oculus Publishing, helped release around 100 games from third-party developers, and according to Pruett, even more are expected in 2025. Meta's CTO, Andrew Bosworth, reaffirmed at X that investments in VR gaming will continue – he literally spoke of "massive" investments.

At the same time, Bosworth admitted in interviews at the World Economic Forum in Davos that VR is growing more slowly than the company had hoped. The layoffs of over 1,000 employees and the closure of several studios – including Ready at Dawn, Downpour Interactive, and Oculus Studios Central Technology – are therefore not the result of a strategic withdrawal from VR, but rather a business efficiency measure that simultaneously represents a change of direction. The question is whether a meta without first-party game content can keep the Quest ecosystem attractive enough for third-party developers – or whether withdrawing from in-house development will also weaken the developer ecosystem as a whole.

According to internal sources, VR headsets are expected to become more expensive in the future. This is a risky strategy if the most affluent users are leaving the ecosystem and the new main user group consists of teenagers who can barely afford expensive hardware.

The market: Figures between hope and disillusionment

The market research industry is divided on the true state of VR – and this disagreement is itself telling. The British market research company Omdia predicted further declines in VR headset sales of 13 percent each in 2024 and 2025, following a 24 percent drop in sales in 2023. The reasons cited were inflationary pressure, a general decline in consumer spending, and the weak performance of the Quest 3, Sony PlayStation VR2, and Pico 4. A recovery is expected from 2026 onwards.

Other market analysts paint a more optimistic picture: According to Fortune Business Insights, the global VR market will grow from $20.83 billion in 2025 to $26.71 billion in 2026 and reach $171 billion by 2034. IDC forecasts that the VR headset market will reach 24.7 million units by the end of 2028 – with a compound annual growth rate of 29.2 percent. These scenarios sound plausible, assuming that new hardware generations and new applications will unleash demand. However, they depend on many conditions that have not yet been met.

What the competition is doing – or not doing –

The VR landscape beyond Meta is characterized by a striking reticence. Apple's Vision Pro, the most talked-about VR/AR newcomer in years, has significantly underperformed since its launch – the future of the $3,499 device is uncertain. Samsung's Galaxy XR has received hardly any software updates since its release and remains limited to the US and South Korea. There has been no indication from Sony regarding a PlayStation VR 3.

Only two new players could potentially shake things up in 2026: ByteDance with Project Swan and Valve with the Steam Frame, both planning to launch new VR headsets. Whether these two products will significantly alter the market remains to be seen. One thing is clear, however: the VR industry stands or falls with Meta. Without the financial commitment of Facebook's parent company, the ecosystem would be virtually inconceivable.

Meta thus remains in a paradoxical position: the largest investor in a technology that has not yet achieved market viability. $70 billion in less than five years is the most striking proof that Mark Zuckerberg cannot easily extricate himself from this bet – neither strategically nor psychologically. The principle of hope is expensive.