$1,800 for the future? Samsung's XR comeback: Why the Galaxy XR is more than just a new pair of glasses.

Android XR explained: Google's open platform as a game changer for the XR industry?

After a five-year hiatus, Samsung is re-entering the extended reality market with the Galaxy XR – a move that should be seen less as a surprising bombshell and more as a calculated strategic move. Unlike previous experiments such as the Gear VR, Samsung is not going it alone this time, but rather forging a powerful alliance with Google and Qualcomm. This partnership forms the foundation for a fundamentally new approach: With the Android XR operating system, Qualcomm's computing power, and Samsung's hardware expertise, an open ecosystem is being created that offers a direct alternative to Apple's closed visionOS and Meta's HorizonOS.

The Galaxy XR confidently positions itself among established competitors. Technically, it aims to surpass the Meta Quest 3 and, in terms of comfort, to have learned from the mistakes of the more expensive Apple Vision Pro. However, the road to success is fraught with challenges. A high price of around $1,800, a hesitant market launch, and a noticeable lack of gaming capabilities raise critical questions. The real revolution, therefore, may lie less in the device itself than in the underlying platform strategy. Android XR has the potential to unify the fragmented market and offer developers a broad foundation. The Galaxy XR is thus the first, crucial building block in a long-term project that could fundamentally shape the future of human-computer interaction.

Suitable for:

• Galaxy XR is official! Samsung's mixed-reality headset, running on Google's Android XR, starts at $1,799.99

Why is Samsung returning to the XR market after a five-year absence?

Samsung withdrew from the XR market after the demise of Gear VR and Daydream. Its return with the Galaxy XR is driven by a changed market dynamic. Unlike previous attempts, Samsung has forged a strategic alliance with Google and Qualcomm. This partnership allows the company not only to develop hardware but also to utilize a standalone operating system called Android XR. This move signals that Samsung views the XR market not as a passing trend but as a long-term investment in the future of human-computer interaction. The collaboration with Google, which already has experience with Daydream, and with Qualcomm, a leading chip developer, creates a solid technological foundation for a sustainable market entry.

What role do Google and Qualcomm play in this strategy?

The partnership with Google is fundamental to Samsung's return. Google is developing the Android XR operating system specifically for the Galaxy XR, providing the necessary software infrastructure. This enables deep integration of Google's services and artificial intelligence, particularly the Gemini platform, directly into the core operating system. Qualcomm contributes the hardware intelligence required for powerful processing and efficient power consumption through its Snapdragon chips. This three-way collaboration addresses a key weakness of Samsung's previous attempts: the lack of a strong, standalone operating system. Android, as the world's most widely used mobile platform, already offers an established developer community and a familiar ecosystem. The combination of Samsung's hardware expertise, Google's software and AI capabilities, and Qualcomm's chip development creates a counterweight to Apple's VisionOS and Meta's HorizonOS, two proprietary systems that have dominated the XR market to date.

How does the Galaxy XR compare technically to the Vision Pro and the Meta Quest 3?

The Samsung Galaxy XR's hardware surpasses both the MetaQuest 3 and the Apple Vision Pro in several aspects. The device utilizes Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon technology, which offers higher processing power than the MetaQuest 3. The Galaxy XR's design is sleek and avoids the bulky appearance of older VR headsets. Particular emphasis has been placed on comfort: the external battery pack significantly reduces the weight on the head, improving battery life during extended use. This is a direct lesson learned from the Vision Pro, whose weight and comfort were criticized by many users. While the design shows influences from the Vision Pro and Quest Pro, it maintains its own distinct aesthetic. However, the rigid head strap could pose a problem. The lesson learned from ten years of XR technology is clear: no two head shapes are identical. A rigid strap can become uncomfortable over extended periods and jeopardize long-term user acceptance. Meta's Quest series has established itself in the market partly because hundreds of accessory manufacturers have developed specialized head straps, padding, and adjustment systems. Samsung seems to have missed an opportunity here by not focusing on maximum modularity for its carrying system.

What market launch strategy is Samsung pursuing with the Galaxy XR?

Samsung's market launch is deliberately hesitant and staggered. The device is currently only available in the US and South Korea. A global launch has not been announced, and it is unclear when other regions will follow. This suggests that Samsung is taking a cautious approach, initially evaluating the market in two key regions. Early market forecasts predict that Samsung will sell only around 100,000 units in 2025. This figure is intentionally conservative and shows that Samsung has learned the lessons from Apple's Vision Pro. Apple also had to revise its sales targets downwards, and Meta's established XR ecosystem, despite years of development, is also not meeting initial expectations. Samsung apparently accepts that the mass market for XR is not yet ready and is instead focusing on strategic growth. This strategy reduces financial risk and allows the company to make improvements based on real user feedback before the global rollout begins.

How does price affect market penetration?

The Galaxy XR is priced at around $1,800, which is significantly less than the Apple Vision Pro at over $3,500, but still positions it firmly in the premium category. This price is prohibitive for several target groups. In today's economic climate, characterized by uncertainty and inflationary pressure, this amount is unattainable for the average consumer. The pricing strategy, therefore, automatically and considerably limits the potential target audience. For comparison, a MetaQuest 3 costs significantly less and already offers an established ecosystem of games and content. However, the bigger drawback isn't the absolute price, but the lack of a clear value proposition. An average buyer can't immediately see why an XR headset costing $1,800 is better than their smartphone or laptop. The use cases are vague and lie somewhere between entertainment and productivity, areas that modern smartphones already cover competently. This results in a very narrow target group: early adopters, XR enthusiasts, developers, and businesses. It's a niche, not a broad, target group, and that's a fundamental market problem.

How does the Galaxy XR differ from the Vision Pro in terms of functionality?

The Galaxy XR primarily positions itself as a media and productivity device within the Google ecosystem, thus positioning itself as the Android equivalent of Apple's Vision Pro. The difference lies in the deep integration of Gemini, Google's multimodal voice and assistant system. Gemini allows users to move windows with their voice, access real-time translations, automatically colorize old photos, or add markers in Google Maps. This AI-powered functionality is impressive and sets the Galaxy XR apart from other systems. However, it's worth noting that many of these features would also be possible on a MetaQuest 3, which is also considerably cheaper. The real differentiator is the native integration of Gemini and the tight integration with Google's ecosystem. The Vision Pro, on the other hand, focuses more on spatial computing applications and native apps. The Galaxy XR, however, acts as an extension of the mobile Android ecosystem into the spatial realm, which makes it easier for many people to understand its benefits and use cases, but at the same time blurs the distinction from the MetaQuest 3.

Why is gaming a major drawback on the Galaxy XR?

Gaming has proven to be one of the most important drivers of long-term user engagement in the XR industry over the years. However, the Galaxy XR is hardly designed for gaming, and this is a significant strategic problem. The device doesn't ship with standard controllers. Instead, Samsung is relying on hand tracking as the primary control method. This means developers have to rework their existing games and apps to support hand tracking. This is often not trivial, as hand tracking requires more precise motion detection, and not all game mechanics are comfortable to use with it. Alternative control models, such as traditional VR controllers, are optional and expensive. Small studios, which make up the bulk of the XR industry, see little economic incentive in this situation. They would either have to painstakingly rework their games or hope that most Galaxy XR buyers also purchase expensive VR controllers. Both scenarios are unattractive from a developer's perspective and lead to a lack of content. Apple Vision Pro users are already familiar with this problem: the ecosystem is small and specialized, and true blockbuster games are lacking. The lack of gaming support also fragments the customer base of XR enthusiasts, who are traditionally gaming-focused.

What about compatibility with PC VR?

The Galaxy XR is also not very appealing to PC VR users. While wireless PC VR streaming via apps like Virtual Desktop is theoretically possible, it requires real-time data transmission over Wi-Fi. Without a native, lossless DisplayPort connection, the Galaxy XR remains problematic for serious VR simulations. Simulation enthusiasts demand low latency and high image quality, which a pure streaming setup cannot reliably deliver. Latency during streaming could also lead to competitive disadvantages in fast-paced PvP shooters. Realistically, PC VR gamers are already waiting for Valve's upcoming XR headset, which is integrated with the SteamVR ecosystem. The PC VR community is loyal to existing platforms, and it's difficult to persuade these users to switch. This further reduces the Galaxy XR to a device for casual VR users and enterprise applications, not for gaming-focused enthusiasts.

What opportunities does the B2B market offer for the Galaxy XR?

While the consumer market is challenging for the Galaxy XR, the B2B sector offers a safety net. The Galaxy XR is finding it significantly easier to gain a foothold in professional environments. Samsung's pilot projects with Samsung Heavy Industries in shipbuilding and medical applications point to potential future directions. In this context, the Galaxy XR has several advantages. Android Enterprise allows for centralized management of the glasses, which greatly simplifies integration into existing IT infrastructures. Qualcomm promises to bring additional business applications to the platform via Snapdragon Spaces. For small and medium-sized businesses, the price of $1,800 is considerably less risky than purchasing a Vision Pro, which costs more than twice as much. A company can view the Galaxy XR as a tool, similar to a tablet or laptop, whereas the Vision Pro is perceived as experimental technology. A particularly interesting application scenario was demonstrated during Samsung's keynote: Gemini can generate three-dimensional spaces for Google Maps from just a handful of user photos. The underlying technology is called Gaussian Splatting and has enormous potential for the hotel industry, automotive retail, real estate agencies, and museums. All industries that want to visually market spaces will find this a powerful tool that delivers tangible results. This practical benefit makes the Galaxy XR significantly more interesting in a B2B context than in the consumer market.

Find the right Metaverse agency and planning office such as a consulting firm - Image: Xpert.Digital

🗒️ Find the right Metaverse agency and planning office such as a consulting firm - search and search for top ten tips for consulting & planning

More about it here:

• Experts in the Metaverse and XR: Find the right partners

Why is Android XR more important than the Galaxy XR headset itself?

From a strategic perspective, the Android XR operating system is significantly more important than the individual Galaxy XR headset. Android XR is a specialized Android operating system with access to the extensive app collection of the Play Store. While this initially sounds like a wealth of options, it's only superficially accurate. The majority of applications in the Play Store run two-dimensionally, as windows in space. Anyone hoping for comprehensive, true XR experiences will need patience. The technical infrastructure for native XR applications exists, including hand, gaze, and voice control. However, developers first need to adapt their apps accordingly to utilize these capabilities. Whether they do so generally depends on the market penetration of the devices. Here, Android XR offers a major advantage: It's an open system and not limited to a single device. Other manufacturers like Xreal and Lynx have already expressed interest in building their own headsets with Android XR. Therefore, more, sometimes specialized, XR glasses will follow in the coming years. These could be offered at lower prices, thus increasing the likelihood of a broader user base and more diverse content. Specialized devices for gaming, XR fitness, or virtual cinema are conceivable. The role of smart glasses, a significantly more compact device category, is particularly important. Google and Samsung have already announced smart glasses, and AR glasses specialist Magic Leap has unveiled a waveguide collaboration with Google. These smart glasses will also run on Android XR, significantly expanding the ecosystem. Google's platform strategy is therefore stronger in the long run than Samsung's hardware strategy.

Suitable for:

• Samsung Galaxy XR – Revolution in the mixed reality market: This headset is supposed to outshine the Apple Vision Pro

What challenges arise from the openness of Android XR?

Android XR's openness is both a blessing and a curse. An open ecosystem enables hardware diversity and faster innovation, but it's also prone to fragmentation. This is a well-known Android problem in the smartphone market: different hardware from various manufacturers, inconsistent user interfaces, and disjointed app experiences. Despite this, Android has prevailed in the smartphone sector because the differences between devices are relatively minor. In spatial computing, however, the differences are greater. A gaming headset has different requirements than productivity glasses or smart glasses. This could lead to Android XR feeling very different across different hardware platforms. Developers might have to optimize apps for different form factors, increasing complexity. A fragmented user experience could undermine trust in the platform. Google must therefore proceed very carefully to maintain consistency while simultaneously enabling hardware innovation. Too loose a control leads to chaos, while too tight a control would negate the benefits of openness.

How does the Galaxy XR position itself in the context of long-term market development?

The Galaxy XR isn't meant to be a game-changer, but rather the starting point of a long-term strategy. Google and Samsung plan to gradually expand the ecosystem and introduce further device categories. This includes lighter AI glasses and specialized XR headsets for various use cases. Until then, the Galaxy XR remains a well-equipped device with limited immediate relevance. Users who already own a MetaQuest 3 or Apple Vision Pro don't need a Galaxy XR. The rest of the potential target audience still needs to be convinced why an XR headset is worth $1,800. That's no easy task, and Samsung is aware of it. The cautious launch and conservative sales forecasts suggest that Samsung is running a marathon, not a sprint. The company is investing in a platform strategy, not a quick consumer hit. This is realistic when considering the history of the XR market.

What are the success factors for Android XR and the Galaxy XR?

The long-term success of Android XR and the Galaxy XR depends on three critical factors: developer interest, device diversity, and practical application benefits. Developers need sufficient financial incentive to develop native XR applications. This requires a sufficiently large user base. Currently, this base is still small, so Google and Samsung need to invest heavily in developer relations. Device diversity is necessary to cover different usage scenarios and make the platform attractive to various customer segments. The announcements from Xreal, Lynx, and other manufacturers are promising but need to be translated into real products. Practical application benefits are perhaps most important. The Gemini integration with Gaussian splatting for spatial mapping is a start, but much more is needed. Productivity tools, education, entertainment, and gaming all need to be served with genuine added value, not just as windowed Android apps. As is so often the case in the XR market, the promise is still greater than the reality. However, anyone who remembers the early days of Android on smartphones knows: patience can pay off. The first version of Android was primitive by today's standards, but Google and the industry have continuously improved the platform. It's realistic to expect Android XR to develop similarly. However, one shouldn't be surprised if the first version doesn't quite live up to the marketing promises.

What lessons has Samsung learned from previous XR mishaps?

Samsung's earlier attempt with Gear VR didn't fail because the hardware was bad, but because the strategic vision was unclear. Gear VR relied on Samsung smartphones as its processing unit, which limited the platform. Google's Daydream suffered from similar problems and a lack of developer support. The Galaxy XR shows that Samsung has understood these mistakes. The device is completely standalone, not dependent on smartphones. It has its own operating system instead of relying on external platforms. Samsung is partnering with Google and Qualcomm instead of going it alone. These strategic changes indicate that Samsung is thinking long-term and won't disappear from the market again anytime soon. However, there are also areas where Samsung seems to be learning from its mistakes. The lack of a gaming focus and the rigid head strap solution are areas where more differentiation would have been possible. Apparently, Samsung prioritizes a faster time-to-market over absolute hardware perfection. This is a conscious decision that can make sense in a rapidly evolving market, but it also leaves opportunities on the table.

How might the XR market develop in the coming years?

The XR market is at a critical juncture. Apple signaled with the Vision Pro that premium XR devices can be an existing market segment. Meta proved with the Quest series that mass-market XR is possible if the price is low enough. Samsung and Google are now positioning themselves with a middle-ground strategy: premium hardware priced between the Quest and Vision Pro, with an open platform. Several scenarios are likely to occur in the coming years. Optimistic scenario: Android XR becomes the leading open XR platform, much like Android became the leading smartphone operating system. A variety of hardware manufacturers bring specialized devices to market. Applications flourish, and XR becomes commonplace. Pessimistic scenario: Android XR fragments, much like classic Android. The user experience is inconsistent. Apple and Meta continue to dominate their respective market segments. Samsung and Android XR remain a niche product. Realistic scenario: Android XR establishes itself as a strong alternative, especially in the B2B sector and for enterprise applications. Consumer adoption remains limited. The Galaxy XR has found a stable target group among early adopters and professional users. Specialized devices based on Android XR are emerging, but they haven't achieved mass-market acceptance. This would still be a success for Google and Samsung, but it wouldn't lead to the mass-market breakthrough that many in the industry had hoped for.

What does the Galaxy XR mean for the industry as a whole?

The Galaxy XR and Android XR aren't primarily important for Samsung or Google themselves, but for the entire XR industry. The announcement shows that the industry continues to believe in XR and isn't ready to write off the technology. This is a strong signal given the high investments and the slow market development so far. Android XR could establish itself as a major alternative to Apple's visionOS and Meta's HorizonOS. A three-way shared platform landscape is healthier than a duopoly-like situation. Android XR offers new choices for developers, manufacturers, and users. For small and specialized manufacturers, Android XR could be the only economically viable operating system. At the same time, Android XR presents challenges for Apple and Meta. They need to rethink their ecosystems and pricing strategies if they want to compete against an open, extensible system. In the long term, this could lead to innovation and better products for users. In the short to medium term, however, the XR market won't change dramatically. Hardware costs will decrease, applications will become more diverse, but mass-market adoption remains a matter of five to ten years.

Where does the technology industry stand with regard to spatial computing?

The industry is at a turning point. After years of promises and dashed expectations, we're finally seeing genuine hardware innovation. The Vision Pro proved that premium XR devices are possible. The Galaxy XR demonstrates that alternatives to the Apple and Meta monopoly are emerging. Announcements of smart glasses and specialized devices suggest that the industry is finally embracing diverse use cases. There won't be one XR device for everyone, but rather different devices for different purposes. Some may be skeptical that XR is truly the future. Considering the investments of Apple, Meta, Google, Samsung, Microsoft, and many others, it's hard to imagine that all these companies are wrong. It's more likely that the technology will be transformative in the long run, but not in the rapid timeframe many had hoped for. This is a common pattern with disruptive technologies: they are overestimated in the short term but underestimated in the long term.

What should you expect from the Galaxy XR?

The Galaxy XR shouldn't be seen as an immediate game-changer, but rather as an important building block in a long-term strategy. It's a technically impressive device that brings Android XR and Google's ecosystem to the XR space. The immediate impact will be limited: users with existing XR devices won't see a compelling reason to switch. Mass adoption won't happen overnight. Instead, the Galaxy XR will play a role for early adopters, developers, B2B users, and XR enthusiasts. Its real significance lies in Android XR as a platform. If Google and its partners successfully expand the platform, attract diverse manufacturers with different hardware, and build genuine, valuable applications, then Android XR could be a transformative force in the long run. But this will take years. Those expecting quick wins will be disappointed. Those willing to wait and understand the long-term vision could witness the emergence of a new computing paradigm. The Galaxy XR is the beginning of this journey, not the end. And as with many technological beginnings, the first version won't deliver on all the marketing promises. But if you are patient, it might be worthwhile to follow the further course of this story.

☑️ Our business language is English or German

☑️ NEW: Correspondence in your national language!

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve you and my team as a personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) . My email address is: wolfenstein ∂ xpert.digital

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development / Marketing / PR / Trade Fairs

Benefit from Xpert.Digital's extensive, fivefold expertise in a comprehensive service package | R&D, XR, PR & Digital Visibility Optimization - Image: Xpert.Digital

Xpert.Digital has in-depth knowledge of various industries. This allows us to develop tailor-made strategies that are tailored precisely to the requirements and challenges of your specific market segment. By continually analyzing market trends and following industry developments, we can act with foresight and offer innovative solutions. Through the combination of experience and knowledge, we generate added value and give our customers a decisive competitive advantage.

More about it here:

• Use the 5x expertise of Xpert.Digital in one package - starting at just €500/month