Logistics Retrofit instead of Stagnation: How hidden early indicators reveal the perfect time for modernization

Retrofit as a strategic lever: How to precisely determine the optimal modernization time

In the highly dynamic world of intralogistics, those responsible face a classic dilemma: Modernizing an existing system too early means wasting valuable remaining service life and tying up capital unnecessarily. However, waiting too long risks production downtime, skyrocketing maintenance costs, and a massive loss of competitiveness. The question is therefore no longer *whether* a retrofit is necessary, but *when* the mathematically and strategically optimal time for it has arrived.

Many companies still rely on the obvious failure of components when making this decision. But once the plant is down, it's already too late for cost-effective action. The key to successful inventory optimization lies instead in recognizing "hidden early warning signs"—subtle warning signals that appear long before a critical failure.

This article explores how a structured analysis of technical obsolescence—using the discontinued Siemens S7-300 series as an example—and an assessment of gradual process efficiency losses can secure the future viability of your warehouse. We demonstrate why a maintenance cost increase of more than 15 percent is an unmistakable warning sign, how rising energy consumption figures indicate mechanical wear, and why your employees' improvised workarounds often reveal more about the state of your IT infrastructure than any official report. Learn how to transition from a reactive crisis manager to a proactive strategist and leverage a logistics retrofit not only to maintain the status quo but also to unlock new potential for throughput and efficiency.

Why is the right timing for a logistics retrofit so crucial?

Choosing the right time for modernization is one of the most critical decisions logistics managers can make. Retrofitting too early squanders the untapped potential of existing equipment and ties up capital that could be better used elsewhere. Retrofitting too late, on the other hand, leads to production downtime, skyrocketing maintenance costs, and jeopardizes the competitiveness of the entire company. The central question, therefore, is no longer whether modernization is necessary, but rather how much longer companies can afford to postpone it.

The answer lies in a systematic early warning system that sends out warning signals long before the critical point. Companies that recognize and correctly interpret these hidden indicators gain an enormous strategic advantage: They can plan their logistics equipment, reserve budgets, and choose the optimal time for modernization without entering crisis mode. They avoid costly emergency measures and strategically use retrofit projects to improve performance, not to control damage.

Which classic technical indicators point to a need for modernization?

Many logistics managers are familiar with the classic technical indicators, but they are often taken seriously too late. The first critical threshold is the age of the system components. Experts recommend that warehouse software and technology should be no more than five years old to be considered modern. However, this five-year mark is only a rough guideline. Actual technical obsolescence is more decisive.

A prime example of technological obsolescence is the widely used Siemens SIMATIC S7-300 system family. The manufacturer has announced the product discontinuation for October 2025. From that point on, components will only be available as spare parts, often at significantly inflated prices. Supply will cease entirely in the 2030s. Companies whose control systems are based on this platform are sitting on a technological time bomb and must adjust their retrofit planning accordingly.

A second classic indicator is the plant's availability rate. As a rule of thumb, a plant with an availability of at least 95 percent is still considered modern. If this rate falls sustainably below 95 percent, it indicates increasing wear and tear problems. However, caution is advised here as well: An availability of 94 percent may not seem dramatic, but in a three-shift operation with 7,500 operating hours per year, it corresponds to a downtime of approximately 375 hours per year.

Availability is significantly impacted by recurring disruptions. Even minor, repeated outages indicate that the system is nearing the end of its lifespan. They typically occur in clusters and signal systemic problems, not isolated random errors. A single outage is an event; multiple consecutive outages are symptoms.

How does the increase in maintenance costs act as a hidden early indicator?

Maintenance costs are one of the most telling hidden early indicators, but they are often overlooked or misinterpreted by many companies. Industry data clearly shows that for a modern system, the increase in maintenance and support costs over a two-year period should be significantly below 15 percent. Exceeding this threshold signals a turning point in the system's life cycle.

This point can be understood mathematically. A system follows a characteristic bathtub curve in terms of failure rates. After the initial start-up phase with occasional teething problems, the failure rate drops to a stable plateau that can last for years. At some point, however, the failure rate begins to rise again, initially imperceptibly, then exponentially. It is precisely in this phase that maintenance specialists see the first warning signs: The cost per repair remains the same, but the frequency increases.

A practical example illustrates the economic implications. If annual maintenance costs suddenly rise from €50,000 to €60,000, it seems like a moderate 20 percent increase. But if this trend continues, the next 12 months will already cost €72,000, then €86,000. Within three to four years, the costs will double or triple. At this point, retrofitting is no longer optional; it's unavoidable. However, those who react after the first 15 percent increase could potentially save several hundred thousand euros.

Maintenance costs often contain hidden warning signs. A particularly critical indicator is when manufacturer support and spare parts supply become increasingly difficult. A retrofit becomes essential when manufacturer support and updates for the system components and operating system are no longer available. At this point, a downward spiral begins: the lack of support increases repair times, which drives up costs. It's like driving a car for which no manufacturer supplies spare parts anymore. You have to improvise, which becomes expensive and dangerous.

Which energy performance indicators signal that a modernization will be profitable?

Energy consumption is one of the most subtle yet powerful early indicators of the need for a retrofit. A system that requires significantly more energy with unchanged or only slightly increased output shows structural inefficiency. This is not normal and should be investigated immediately.

The typical scenario looks like this: A plant processes the same number of orders in 2024 as in 2023, but energy consumption has increased by 8, 10, or even 15 percent. This indicates mechanical wear and tear. Worn bearing and conveyor systems operate less efficiently. Drives have to compensate with higher force, friction losses increase, and acceleration takes longer.

Energy consumption becomes a particularly critical indicator when combined with a lack of energy tracking features. Modern systems have automatic standby modes, load balancing functions, and adaptive controls that reduce energy consumption during periods of low demand. Older systems often run at full load, regardless of whether they are operating at 50 or 95 percent capacity. If a ten-year-old system continuously operates at maximum energy consumption, while a comparable modern system consumes significantly less energy at the same capacity, this is a clear indication that retrofitting is necessary.

The increased energy prices further exacerbate the economic challenges. Especially in the current climate, even small efficiency gains can lead to significant cost savings. A retrofit with modern energy management can reduce operating costs by 10 to 30 percent. For a system with annual energy costs of €50,000, a 20 percent saving equates to €10,000 per year. A retrofit that pays for itself in four to five years is often recouped through energy savings alone in just two to three years.

A particularly important metric is energy consumption per processed unit (kWh per picking operation, per shelf position, or per ton moved). A decrease in performance with constant or increasing energy consumption sends a clear signal. Modern retrofit technologies with adaptive controls, regenerative systems, and optimized motion sequences can reduce specific energy consumption by 15 to 35 percent.

How can you identify hidden process failures and workarounds as warning signs?

One of the most subtle yet revealing indicators is the gradual emergence of workarounds. These are informal workarounds that employees develop to deal with the system's weaknesses. They are hidden because they don't appear in official bug reports, but they are extremely telling.

A classic example: The automated warehouse management system regularly reports errors in shelf allocation. The optimal process involves the system automatically identifying available spaces and storing goods. Instead, employees are partially doing this manually, bypassing the system. What does this mean? The system is no longer reliable enough to depend on. It has entered the phase where manual intervention is necessary. This is a serious warning sign because it indicates that the system's automation logic is damaged or outdated.

Other workarounds arise when configurations are only possible through custom programming. This indicates that the user interface or the logical structure of the system no longer meets current requirements. Any custom programming is a sign that the system is no longer flexible enough. Users have to hack the standard features to perform their daily tasks.

This exponentially increases operational risk. With each workaround, the system becomes less traceable, less maintainable, and more prone to unexpected errors. Furthermore, companies rely on specialists who understand these workarounds. If these specialists leave the company, their expertise goes with them.

What role do outsider signals such as skills shortages and documentation losses play?

An exceptionally important, but often overlooked, indicator is knowledge about the plant itself. If documentation is missing, construction plans have been lost, or the responsible specialists have left the company, this is a strategic warning sign.

Why? Without documentation, a retrofit is impossible or becomes significantly more expensive. On the other hand, a warehouse without precise technical documentation is fragile even during normal operation. If an expert is suddenly unavailable and no one understands how the control system was configured, repairs become a guessing game. This leads to costly emergency repair services and an increased risk of misconfigurations.

The shortage of skilled workers exacerbates this effect. When specialized maintenance technicians are hard to find or only available through expensive external service providers, the pressure to modernize increases. Retrofitting to modern, standardized systems with a large pool of skilled workers reduces this dependency.

A more subtle sign is when manufacturer training is no longer available. This means the manufacturer considers the product obsolete and no longer expects new installations. At this stage, spare parts are often still available, but at high prices, and technical support is minimal.

How are performance and throughput indicators correctly interpreted?

Classic performance indicators such as throughput time and throughput are critical, but must be interpreted in the correct context. A system whose throughput time stagnates or even slowly increases is a warning sign. Throughput time is the average time an order spends in the warehouse from goods receipt until it is ready for shipment. It is determined by process effectiveness.

An increasing throughput time can have several causes. The most likely cause in older systems is that the system no longer scales. If the number of orders per day increases, but the throughput time does not decrease proportionally, this indicates that the system is operating at its limit. A modern system would be proportionally faster. An outdated system begins to stagnate.

An even more critical signal is when the throughput time increases while the order volume remains the same. This is unmistakable: the system is becoming less efficient. This can indicate wear and tear, software bugs, or a combination of both.

The throughput, meaning the number of orders processed per unit of time, should remain stable with well-maintained equipment or increase after system optimizations. A decrease in maximum throughput is critical. A conveyor system that previously processed 500 orders per hour suddenly only manages 460 is a sign of material fatigue or control problems.

This combination is particularly telling: decreasing throughput plus increasing lead time means that the system is structurally overloaded. A retrofit will not only be profitable, it will be necessary to eliminate capacity bottlenecks.

What role do customer expectations and market changes play as external leading indicators?

An often overlooked category of leading indicators is external market changes beyond the company's control. Customer expectations regarding delivery speed have fundamentally changed. While a one-week delivery time was acceptable ten years ago, customers today expect next-day or even same-day delivery. This shift is not a temporary trend, but a structural market change.

This means that older warehouse systems may have been optimally designed for the requirements of 2015, but will be undersized or too slow for the requirements of 2025. A warehouse with lead times of 24 to 48 hours was competitive in 2015, but will no longer be so in 2025 when the market expects same-day delivery.

Another external indicator is the change in the product mix. If the company previously stocked 50 different products and now stocks 5,000, the old system wasn't designed for such diversity. The warehouse management software may need to be extended with features like batch tracking and serial number management. If the old system lacks these features and requires cumbersome workarounds, that's a sign that a retrofit is needed.

Regulatory requirements must also be considered. With the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), companies are increasingly required to document their sustainability efforts. An outdated warehouse system with high energy consumption and poor transparency becomes a compliance risk. A retrofit with energy management and data collection not only reduces operational costs but also regulatory risks.

LTW Intralogistics – Engineers of Flow - Image: LTW Intralogistics GmbH

LTW offers its customers not individual components, but integrated complete solutions. Consulting, planning, mechanical and electrotechnical components, control and automation technology, as well as software and service – everything is networked and precisely coordinated.

In-house production of key components is particularly advantageous. This allows for optimal control of quality, supply chains, and interfaces.

LTW stands for reliability, transparency, and collaborative partnership. Loyalty and honesty are firmly anchored in the company's philosophy – a handshake still means something here.

Suitable for:

• LTW Solutions

How does a structured current state analysis work for the early detection of modernization needs?

A professional current state analysis follows a structured process that systematically uncovers hidden indicators. The first step is the inventory. This includes detailed documentation of all components: Which control systems are installed? When were they installed? Which software versions are running? What manufacturer lifecycle data exists?

The second step is to examine availability and reliability. This involves analyzing specific data: How many unplanned outages occurred last year? How long did they last on average? Which components were affected? The mean time between failures (MTBF) and the mean time to repair (MTTR) are key metrics here.

The third step addresses performance effectiveness. Here, throughput rates, lead times, picking costs per unit, and energy consumption per action are measured. Modern warehouse management systems already provide this data, but older systems may require manual data collection.

The fourth step evaluates future viability. Can the system be integrated with modern technologies such as Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs), cloud systems, or AI solutions? Or is the architecture so rigid that integrations are impossible? This indicates that the system is not only technically outdated but is also beginning to close down strategically.

This structured analysis then produces concrete priorities for action. Not all problems require a complete retrofit. Perhaps a focused control system upgrade will suffice. Or a connectivity upgrade. Or a hybrid approach with new software on top of existing hardware.

What does the 15 percent maintenance cost threshold really mean economically?

The 15 percent maintenance cost threshold deserves closer examination because, while it appears deceptively simple as a mere percentage, it actually reflects complex technical and economic dynamics. It is not arbitrarily chosen, but rather based on decades of practical operational experience.

A maintenance cost increase of less than 15 percent over a two-year period is consistent with normal wear and tear when maintenance is adequate. Inflation contributes to this, as do moderate price increases from manufacturers. If maintenance costs rise by 10 percent every two years, this is economically sustainable.

Once the 15 percent threshold is exceeded, it indicates something else: The failure rate begins to rise. It's not just about higher costs per repair, but also about more repairs. This is the sign of the inflection point in the bathtub curve. The system begins to experience accelerated wear.

At this point, a comprehensive economic analysis must be performed. A retrofit typically costs 30 to 50 percent less than a new build. A typical payback period is between two and three years. This means that if maintenance costs increase by 20 or 25 percent annually, a retrofit becomes economically worthwhile as soon as the total costs (maintenance plus downtime risk) exceed the retrofit costs.

How are obsolescence risks identified and assessed early on?

Obsolescence is the risk that spare parts, components, or entire systems will no longer be available. There are several levels of obsolescence, and professional logistics managers need to be familiar with them all.

The first stage is the product discontinuation announcement. The manufacturer announces that a product will be phased out. This is a clear warning signal. From this moment on, a retrofit process should begin, even if the system is still functioning. The case of the Siemens S7-300 illustrates the practical significance: After the discontinuation announcement in 2025, components will initially still be available as spare parts, but at inflated prices. In just a few years, they will no longer be available at all.

The second stage is the availability problem. A manufacturer discontinues production of a system but still has spare parts in stock. This is an unstable phase because availability is uncertain. An order might be fulfilled today, but not tomorrow.

The third stage is complete unavailability. This point should be avoided if the retrofit process is managed correctly. But if it does occur, emergency management is necessary: ​​re-engineering components, restoring used parts, or complete, expensive emergency reinstallations.

A systematic obsolescence management plan addresses these scenarios. Companies with critical warehouse systems should conduct regular checks: Are the installed control systems still on the manufacturer's roadmaps? Are software updates still offered? Can components still be purchased on the market?

What costs arise from longer delivery times and throughput problems?

One of the most underestimated early indicators is the economic impact of delivery delays. When a warehouse retrofit becomes necessary, the most pressing problem is often not the failure rate, but the extended lead times.

A practical example: An e-commerce company processes 10,000 orders per day. The warehouse originally had a throughput time of 12 hours (from receipt of goods to dispatch). Due to wear and tear and inefficiencies, the throughput time has increased to 24 hours. This means that orders received in the morning are not shipped until the following day. For a same-day delivery service, this is a disaster. Customers become dissatisfied, and the company suffers reputational damage.

The economic costs of this delay are considerable. A customer who doesn't receive same-day delivery may switch to a competitor. The average lost order value per delayed order often ranges between €30 and €100. With 10,000 orders daily and just 5 percent customer churn due to the extended delivery time, that equates to 500 lost transactions daily, or €150,000 to €500,000 in lost revenue per month.

A retrofit that reduces the throughput time back to 12 hours may pay for itself not only through operational cost savings, but primarily through revenue retention. This is a critical economic indicator that goes beyond mere cost savings.

Which KPIs should be constantly monitored to identify the optimal time for a retrofit?

Professional logistics management establishes an early warning indicator dashboard that is regularly monitored. The most important KPIs are:

Availability is the first line of defense. It should be recorded monthly. 98 percent availability is good; below 95 percent is critical.

The MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) shows the average time between two failures. A healthy system should have MTBF values ​​in months, not weeks. A decrease in MTBF is a clear warning sign.

The MTTR (Mean Time To Repair) indicates how long repairs take. An increase in MTTR suggests that repairs are becoming more complex, which points to system deterioration.

Maintenance costs, expressed as a percentage of the asset's value, should be continuously monitored. An increase exceeding 15 percent over a two-year period is a sign that a retrofit is needed.

The specific energy consumption per unit processed should be recorded monthly. An increase of more than 3 to 5 percent annually indicates efficiency problems.

The throughput time should be measured daily. Trends over weeks and months will show whether the system is becoming more or less efficient.

Picking accuracy is an indirect indicator. An increase in the error rate can point to control problems or user error in circumventing the system.

How is the critical moment identified at which a retrofit becomes economically unavoidable?

The critical moment is reached when several indicators turn negative simultaneously. A single negative signal could be a measurement error or a temporary problem. But when availability decreases, maintenance costs increase, lead times lengthen, and energy consumption rises, it's time to act.

A practical decision-making model works as follows: The costs of a total system failure are calculated. If the system fails, how many days will the recovery take? How much revenue will be lost? For a large warehouse, this could amount to millions of euros. This figure forms the risk budget. If the retrofit costs are significantly lower than this risk budget, the retrofit is economically justified.

Example: A system costs €3 million. A total outage would last a week and cause €500,000 in lost revenue. A retrofit costs €1.5 million and pays for itself in three years. Even if only three outages are avoided in the next five years, the retrofit will be worthwhile. That's a sound business calculation.

An additional decision criterion is the potential for disruption. When critical spare parts are running low and will no longer be available in a few months, time is of the essence. A retrofit should be completed beforehand; otherwise, an emergency retrofit under time pressure and with additional costs is likely.

What is the optimal retrofit strategy based on leading indicators?

Not all retrofits are the same. A strategic approach differentiates between various upgrade scenarios.

The first scenario is the minimal retrofit: only the control electronics and software are renewed, while the mechanical components (racks, conveyors) are retained. This is the most cost-effective option and works well if the mechanics are still in good condition. This is typical for regularly maintained machines such as high-bay racking systems or stacker cranes, where wear parts were replaced early.

The second scenario is modular retrofit: Old components are replaced modularly. A conveyor system is expanded, a control system is renewed, and autonomous mobile robots are added as a supplement. This works well if the plant has structural problems in specific areas, but not a system-wide problem.

The third scenario is a complete retrofit: controls, electrical systems, drives, and some mechanical components are renewed, while the building structure and fundamental design are retained. This is the standard option and typically pays for itself within two to three years.

The choice of scenario depends on the early warning signs. A minimal retrofit makes sense if the control technology is the only legacy issue. A modular retrofit is appropriate if specific components are weak. A complete retrofit is necessary if the entire system is nearing the end of its service life.

What hidden opportunities arise from a retrofit project?

A retrofit is not just about cost reduction, but a strategic investment in future viability. An important hidden benefit is the ability to integrate new technologies that were not possible with the old system.

With updated controls and software, autonomous mobile robots can be integrated to handle peak loads or reduce manual travel. They can be easily integrated into existing control systems and expand capacity without major building extensions.

Modern sensors and cloud connectivity enable a data acquisition system that facilitates AI optimization. Predictive models can forecast material flows, optimize inventory, and automatically adjust throughput.

A modernized IT infrastructure enables direct integration with contemporary warehouse management systems and higher-level ERP systems such as SAP or Microsoft Dynamics. This translates to end-to-end transparency, greater planning reliability, and improved customer communication.

A retrofit often presents an opportunity to re-evaluate the plant design. Based on current and future business requirements, processes can be reconfigured to achieve maximum business continuity and performance.

What role do external consultation and expertise play in early detection?

A classic mistake is making optimization decisions solely internally. External experts offer several advantages.

First, they have comparative data. They have modernized dozens or hundreds of similar facilities and know which indicators are critical and which are still within the normal range. A warehouse manager with fifteen years of experience in one company has fewer external benchmarks than a retrofit specialist with experience in twenty different industries.

Secondly, external experts bring objectivity. An investment manager might be emotionally attached to an older, but "proven" investment. An external consultant sees only the facts and can provide an independent analysis.

Thirdly, retrofit specialists possess methodological expertise. They conduct systematic as-is analyses, use standardized audit checklists, and can identify early indicators that an internal manager might overlook. They document the status in technical profiles for each piece of equipment.

External analysis is not a luxury, but a matter of sound economic practice. A retrofit consultation costing €50,000 can prevent a €500,000 costly mistake or enable optimal retrofit planning, thus avoiding expensive emergency responses.

How can an optimal retrofit be carried out without interrupting operations?

A major advantage of retrofitting is that it can take place during ongoing operations. This is made possible by phased plans in which the modernizations are implemented step by step.

The first phase is the planning phase. A detailed analysis of the current state records the condition of the mechanics, electronics, software, and material flow. Each device is assigned a technical profile. Based on this, modernization measures are prioritized and divided into phases.

The second phase addresses quick wins. Simple, fast improvements with high benefits are implemented first. This could include optimizing the control system or installing energy-saving sensors.

The subsequent phases address more complex changes. A new control platform is installed while the old one is still running. The migration is carried out gradually, first on non-critical components, later on critical systems.

The final phase is stabilization. The new infrastructure is tested and optimized, and employees are trained.

The paradigm is: minimal operational disruption, continuous productivity. Affected areas only pause during clearly defined time windows to avoid bottlenecks. This is possible because modern retrofit techniques utilize predictive engineering: the entire plant is modernized piece by piece, with meticulous attention to detail.

How is the success of a retrofit measured and controlled?

After a retrofit, its success must be scientifically proven. Modern warehouse control systems provide precise data on throughput times, energy consumption, and system availability. This transparency makes it possible to continuously monitor the return on investment and identify optimization potential early on.

The proven KPIs after retrofit completion typically include a reduction in unplanned downtime of 10 to 20 percent. An increase in order picking performance of up to 25 percent is realistic. A reduction in energy costs through intelligent load management is also to be expected. Companies that systematically track these metrics typically achieve payback periods of between two and three years.

An additional indicator of success is scalability. After the retrofit, the system can be easily expanded, new technologies can be integrated, and process changes can be quickly adapted. An old system has become rigid; a modern system is flexible.

Regular monitoring of the new KPIs ensures that the retrofit achieves its objectives and that the modernization cycle starts again from scratch. The next survey of leading indicators should take place in three to five years, not sooner. This is the typical rhythm for sustainable logistics infrastructure development.

☑️ Our business language is English or German

☑️ NEW: Correspondence in your national language!

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve you and my team as a personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) . My email address is: wolfenstein ∂ xpert.digital

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development / Marketing / PR / Trade Fairs

Benefit from Xpert.Digital's extensive, fivefold expertise in a comprehensive service package | R&D, XR, PR & Digital Visibility Optimization - Image: Xpert.Digital

Xpert.Digital has in-depth knowledge of various industries. This allows us to develop tailor-made strategies that are tailored precisely to the requirements and challenges of your specific market segment. By continually analyzing market trends and following industry developments, we can act with foresight and offer innovative solutions. Through the combination of experience and knowledge, we generate added value and give our customers a decisive competitive advantage.

More about it here:

• Use the 5x expertise of Xpert.Digital in one package - starting at just €500/month

Our global industry and business expertise in business development, sales and marketing - Image: Xpert.Digital

Industry focus: B2B, digitalization (from AI to XR), mechanical engineering, logistics, renewable energies and industry

More about it here:

• Xpert Business Hub

A topic hub with insights and expertise:

• Knowledge platform on the global and regional economy, innovation and industry-specific trends
• Collection of analyses, impulses and background information from our focus areas
• A place for expertise and information on current developments in business and technology
• Topic hub for companies that want to learn about markets, digitalization and industry innovations