Artificial intelligence in the German economy: The turning point has been reached.

113 minutes of time saved per day: These figures show the true power of AI in the workplace

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming from a technological experiment into a strategic necessity that will determine future competitiveness. Current figures demonstrate an accelerated development – ​​while only around 12 percent of companies used AI in 2022, this figure is expected to reach between 20 and 27 percent by 2024. However, this dynamic reveals a growing gap: while almost half of large companies have already implemented AI, medium-sized businesses lag significantly behind with adoption rates of only 17 to 28 percent.

At the same time, strategic perceptions have fundamentally changed. For 91 percent of companies, generative AI is now crucial to their business model, and the willingness to invest is increasing dramatically. Initial empirical data demonstrate impressive productivity gains averaging 13 percent in companies using AI, and daily time savings of up to 113 minutes per employee. However, despite this potential, significant obstacles such as a lack of expertise, legal uncertainties due to the new EU AI regulation, and an acute shortage of skilled workers are hindering widespread transformation. Germany is at a critical juncture in global competition, where the course for technological advancement or falling behind will be determined.

Suitable for:

• Decision-making and decision-making processes for AI in companies: From strategic impetus to practical implementation

When digital experiments become a strategic necessity

The German economic landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation that goes far beyond mere digitalization. Artificial intelligence is evolving from an experimental technology into a decisive factor for economic competitiveness. Current data paints a complex picture: Germany is at a turning point where the gap between leaders and laggards is widening dramatically. While some are already realizing measurable productivity gains, others risk falling behind.

The figures speak for themselves. According to the Federal Statistical Office, around 20 percent of German companies will be using artificial intelligence (AI) in 2024, although different surveys yield slightly varying results depending on the methodology used. The ifo Institute even reported a figure of 27 percent in July 2024. More crucial than the exact number, however, is the pace of adoption: While only 11 percent of companies used AI in 2021 and around 12 percent in 2022, adoption is now accelerating. By the end of 2025, another 25 percent of companies plan to start or intensify their use of AI. This development marks the transition from the pilot phase to widespread implementation across companies.

The discrepancy between company size and implementation rate is striking. While nearly half of all large companies with 250 or more employees now rely on AI technologies, the rate for medium-sized businesses with 50 to 249 employees is only 28 percent. Small businesses with 10 to 49 employees reach a mere 17 percent. These figures reveal a worrying divide within the German economy. Large corporations possess the resources, expertise, and willingness to take risks to systematically advance AI projects. Medium-sized and small businesses, on the other hand, face structural barriers: limited budgets, a lack of skilled personnel, and uncertainty regarding regulatory requirements.

From technological toy to strategic imperative

The strategic perception of artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed. A study by the auditing firm KPMG impressively documents this paradigm shift: 91 percent of the German companies surveyed now see generative AI as crucial for their business model and future value creation. In 2024, this figure was only 55 percent. This doubling within a single year signals more than mere enthusiasm for the technology. It marks the realization that AI is becoming a fundamental prerequisite for economic success.

In parallel, strategic maturity has improved significantly. Nearly seven out of ten companies now have an explicit strategy for generative AI, compared to only 31 percent in 2024. A further 28 percent are actively working on developing such a strategy. These figures demonstrate that AI is no longer viewed as an isolated IT project, but rather as a company-wide transformation requiring strategic management. Companies are increasingly recognizing that the successful use of AI extends beyond technological implementation and requires organizational adjustments, cultural change, and new skill sets.

Investment readiness follows this strategic reassessment. 82 percent of companies plan to increase their AI budgets in the next twelve months. More than half of these, 51 percent, even intend to increase their budgets by at least 40 percent. Last year, these figures were 53 and 28 percent, respectively. This massive increase in investment readiness reflects not only increased confidence in the technology but also the recognition that substantial resources are needed to successfully scale AI. The era of small pilot projects with limited budgets is giving way to large-scale strategic investments.

The industry-specific distribution is particularly revealing. In Germany, as expected, information and communication technology shows the highest AI adoption at 42 percent. Legal and tax consulting, as well as auditing, follow at 36 percent, driven primarily by the automation of document processing and creation. Research and development also stands at 36 percent, as AI is particularly used in data analysis and modeling. Banking accounts for 34 percent, while management consulting is at 27 percent. The broadcasting and telecommunications sectors, as well as media, each reach 26 percent.

Measurable productivity gains overcome skepticism

The long-standing debate about whether artificial intelligence actually leads to measurable productivity gains is increasingly finding an empirical answer. Data from various studies are converging on impressive figures. A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis found that the use of generative artificial intelligence increases employee productivity by 33 percent for every hour they use AI. This is not a theoretical projection, but is based on the analysis of actual work processes. In Germany, 82 percent of companies using generative AI are already reporting productivity increases. On average, these amount to 13 percent per year.

The time savings are clearly evident in everyday work life. According to a global survey by the Adecco Group, German employees save an average of 64 minutes per day through the use of AI. Another study even arrives at a figure of 113 minutes of daily time savings. The Boston Consulting Group found in its research that 58 percent of AI users gain at least five working hours per week. This saved time is by no means used for inactivity. 41 percent use it to complete more tasks, 39 percent dedicate themselves to new tasks, another 39 percent experiment with AI tools, and 38 percent focus on strategic activities. The time savings therefore do not lead to job losses, but rather to a shift from repetitive to value-adding activities.

The macroeconomic projections are remarkable. According to estimates, the use of generative AI could save 3.9 billion working hours in Germany by 2030. This corresponds exactly to the demographic gap of 4.2 billion working hours created by the shortage of skilled workers. Artificial intelligence is thus becoming not only a productivity factor, but also a potential solution to one of the most pressing structural challenges facing the German economy. The German Economic Institute (IW) predicts that annual macroeconomic productivity growth could increase from the current 0.4 percent to an average of 0.9 percent between 2025 and 2030, and to 1.2 percent between 2030 and 2040, solely due to AI.

These figures, however, need to be viewed with nuance. The hoped-for increase in productivity doesn't happen automatically. Several studies indicate that saving time is not synonymous with increased productivity. One study shows that a third of employees continue to spend the time saved on the same tasks as before. For time savings to translate into higher productivity, employers must define clear expectations and specify which new tasks employees will be expected to perform. Simply implementing technology isn't enough. Accompanying organizational adjustments, process optimizations, and change management measures are essential.

Industry-specific application areas demonstrate concrete added value.

The practical application of artificial intelligence is unfolding along the entire business value chain. In the automotive industry, a traditional core area of ​​German industrial strength, AI is revolutionizing both production and product development. At BMW plants, AI-supported image processing systems are reducing inspection processes from 40 to 24 seconds while simultaneously improving defect detection by 40 percent. Siemens and Audi are using digital twins to virtually map entire production lines, thereby reducing planning times by 35 percent. Predictive maintenance systems detect machine faults before they lead to breakdowns and significantly reduce unplanned downtime.

However, the automotive industry, in particular, is investing cautiously in AI computing power, teams, and budgets compared to other sectors. While the maturity level of AI adoption in the automotive industry has increased from 4.4 to 5.4 over the past five years, it still lags slightly behind the overall industry average. This reveals a paradox: While the industry has recognized the potential and is developing some impressive applications, widespread adoption is often lacking. Many applications are still in the pilot phase. According to a Capgemini survey, 44 percent of automotive companies use generative AI in customer service, but only 18 percent are conducting pilot projects in ideation and content creation.

The use of AI is particularly diverse in marketing, sales, and customer service. AI-powered systems analyze customer behavior, create personalized offers, and automate routine tasks. Lead scoring algorithms evaluate potential customers based on their interactions and prioritize sales activities on the most promising contacts. Chatbots and voicebots handle repetitive customer service inquiries, with companies reporting reductions of over 40 percent. Customer service representatives can then use the freed-up capacity for complex problem-solving and consultation-intensive interactions.

Predictive selling uses AI to forecast optimal customer offers. Graph neural networks analyze complex relationships between products, customer interactions, and sales. One B2B company was able to increase its conversion rates by 40 percent using these technologies. In e-commerce, AI-driven recommendation systems improve click-through rates by more than 25 percent while simultaneously reducing advertising costs. Hyper-personalization makes it possible to tailor products and services precisely to individual customer needs.

In the financial sector, AI systems analyze complex data patterns and support risk assessments. Deutsche Bank uses a 275-petaflop GPU grid that accelerates trading surveillance by more than a third and reduces false alarms by 41 percent. In the chemical and pharmaceutical industries, AI optimizes complex processes and accelerates product development by identifying the most promising compounds from thousands of possible formulations. The logistics industry uses reinforcement learning to adjust routes in real time and speed up deliveries. DHL has achieved significant efficiency gains through this technology.

Structural obstacles are slowing down the transformation.

Despite its obvious potential and measurable successes, significant barriers stand in the way of widespread AI adoption. The biggest hurdle is a lack of knowledge about the technology. 71 percent of companies that do not yet use AI cite a lack of know-how as the main reason. This knowledge gap is multifaceted: it encompasses a lack of technical understanding of how AI systems function and their capabilities, a lack of strategic knowledge about meaningful use cases within their own company, and uncertainty about implementation processes and success measurement.

Legal uncertainties and data protection concerns constitute the second major barrier. 58 percent of companies are worried about legal implications, and 53 percent have data protection concerns. This problem is initially exacerbated by the EU AI Regulation, which has been gradually coming into force since February 2025. The law categorizes AI systems into four risk classes and defines corresponding requirements. High-risk AI systems, such as those used in human resources or for loan approval decisions, are subject to comprehensive documentation, monitoring, and quality requirements. Non-compliance can be punished with fines of up to €35 million or seven percent of global annual turnover.

Many companies are overwhelmed by the question of which of their AI applications should be classified as high-risk and which specific compliance requirements must be met. The AI ​​Regulation applies in addition to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and both sets of rules must be considered together. Existing data protection processes can be used as a foundation for AI compliance, but they must be expanded to include specific aspects such as fairness, protection of fundamental rights, and the traceability of decisions. Companies need transparent audit trails and must clearly define responsibilities: Who monitors? Who documents? Who intervenes if something goes wrong?

The shortage of skilled workers is exacerbating the situation. Between 35 and 41 percent of German companies consider the lack of technical talent a significant obstacle to AI projects. The number of job postings for AI developers rose from 23,000 to 37,000 per quarter between 2019 and 2024. Despite this growing demand, the skills shortage persists. Germany is competing internationally for AI talent with countries that advertise more aggressively and often offer better conditions. Although, according to a LinkedIn analysis, Germany is 1.7 times more likely than the OECD average to report being proficient with AI tools and applications, ranking second worldwide behind the USA, this is still insufficient to meet the demand.

Interestingly, some companies are using AI themselves as a solution to the IT skills shortage. According to a Bitkom survey, five percent of companies are using AI to bridge staffing gaps. Among large companies with more than 250 employees, this figure rises to 21 percent. AI takes over routine tasks in software development and IT administration, allowing existing specialists to focus on more complex activities. This alleviates the skills shortage, but does not fundamentally solve it.

The gap between pilot project and productive use

One of the biggest challenges in AI transformation is the so-called pilot-to-production gap. Many companies develop successful AI prototypes in controlled testing environments but fail to transfer them into production. 23 percent of German companies have transferred more than half of their generative AI experiments into production, which is significantly higher than the global average of 16 percent. However, this also means that 77 percent of German companies use less than half of their AI experiments in production.

The reasons for this gap are manifold. Technically, scaling often fails because pilot projects use shortcuts: models run on local machines with manual process steps that are unsuitable for production. The transition requires a robust, scalable infrastructure with automated workflows for data extraction, model training, validation, deployment, and continuous monitoring. MLOps pipelines must be established that cover the entire lifecycle of AI models and enable a reliable transfer from the pilot phase to production environments.

Organizationally, the link between technical feasibility and business benefit is often missing. Pilot projects are conducted in isolation within IT departments or innovation labs, without early involvement of the business units that will later work with the systems. There is a lack of clear success criteria and quantifiable key performance indicators (KPIs), which should be defined before the project begins. Without such metrics, it remains unclear whether a pilot project was successful and justifies scaling.

Successfully scaling AI projects requires a systematic approach. First, pilot projects must be linked to business goals and KPIs from the outset. Instead of technology-driven experiments, companies should identify concrete business problems for which AI can offer solutions. Second, building scalable infrastructure is essential. Cloud platforms, automated data pipelines, and MLOps processes must be established early on. Third, robust data governance must ensure that data is clean, available, and compliant. Fourth, expertise must be developed or acquired, not only for development but also for production operations. Fifth, an incremental rollout with feedback loops is recommended so that systems can be improved step by step.

Our EU and Germany expertise in business development, sales and marketing - Image: Xpert.Digital

Industry focus: B2B, digitalization (from AI to XR), mechanical engineering, logistics, renewable energies and industry

More about it here:

• Xpert Business Hub

A topic hub with insights and expertise:

• Knowledge platform on the global and regional economy, innovation and industry-specific trends
• Collection of analyses, impulses and background information from our focus areas
• A place for expertise and information on current developments in business and technology
• Topic hub for companies that want to learn about markets, digitalization and industry innovations

Return on Investment as a critical success factor

Measuring the return on investment (ROI) of AI projects presents companies with unique challenges. Unlike traditional IT investments, the effects are often not directly quantifiable. Nevertheless, an ROI analysis is crucial for strategic decisions and justifying further investments. Studies show that 48 percent of German companies that actually use AI report that the benefits outweigh the costs. At the same time, 63 percent of companies are hesitant to use AI more extensively because they find it difficult to assess its benefits.

The ROI calculation for AI investments generally follows the formula: ROI equals revenue minus investment costs, divided by investment costs, multiplied by 100. The challenge lies in accurately capturing revenues and costs. Quantifiable revenues include cost savings through the automation of repetitive tasks, time savings for employees, reduced error rates, increased sales through improved personalization, and faster time-to-market for new products. Qualitative benefits, such as improved decision-making quality thanks to data-driven insights or increased employee satisfaction through the elimination of undesirable routine tasks, are more difficult to quantify but no less important.

A business validation report shows that integrating AI into CX and ERP systems can achieve a conservative ROI of 214 percent over five years. In the best-case scenario, the ROI can even reach 761 percent. This integration can lead to an increase in average transaction sizes of 10 to 30 percent, thus directly boosting revenue. For example, a company investing €50,000 in an AI-powered chatbot system saves 1,200 hours of manual customer support annually, equivalent to €75,000 in personnel costs. The ROI is therefore 50 percent in the first year alone.

Investment costs include not only obvious items such as software licenses, hardware, and development, but also frequently underestimated factors: integration into existing systems, employee training, change management, ongoing maintenance and support, as well as compliance and data protection costs. Hidden costs arise from project management efforts, temporary productivity losses during the transition, and necessary process adjustments.

Successful companies define specific KPIs for measuring ROI that are aligned with their business objectives. These include cost per unit before and after AI implementation, time savings through automated processes (monetarily valued), reduction of error rates and improvement in quality, user acceptance and its impact on productivity, and customer satisfaction scores. Continuous monitoring of these metrics enables targeted corrective action if AI projects do not deliver the expected results.

Suitable for:

• AI added value? Before you invest in AI: Identify the 4 silent killers of successful projects

Change management as an underestimated success factor

The introduction of artificial intelligence is primarily not a technological transformation, but an organizational and cultural one. Technical implementation alone does not guarantee success. A profound cultural shift within the company is required, which can only be ensured through effective change management. Most failed AI projects fail not because of the technology itself, but because of a lack of acceptance, insufficient organizational preparation, and a lack of management commitment.

The first step towards cultural change is awareness and education. Employees and managers need to understand why AI is relevant to the company and how it contributes to achieving strategic goals. Workshops, training sessions, and information events are effective means of imparting knowledge and addressing concerns. Many employees have vague fears of job loss or being overwhelmed by new technologies. Open communication about realistic impacts and opportunities reduces resistance.

Promoting AI skills goes beyond technical expertise. While data scientists and AI developers need in-depth technical know-how, business departments also need to develop a fundamental understanding to identify meaningful use cases and utilize AI systems effectively. Tailored training programs and collaboration with external experts can be invaluable in this regard. Crucially, training should be viewed not as a one-off event, but as an ongoing process.

Adapting structures and processes is often necessary. Traditional hierarchical decision-making processes and rigid ways of working are incompatible with agile AI development and its iterative improvement cycles. Companies should be prepared to question traditional ways of working and pursue new, more agile approaches. This can include introducing new communication channels, adapting decision-making processes, or redesigning workflows. Cross-functional teams that combine subject matter expertise with technical skills have proven particularly effective.

The cultural integration of AI requires an open and innovative mindset that recognizes the value of data and the potential of data-driven decision-making. AI should not be viewed as an external element, but rather as an integral part of the corporate culture. Fostering a culture of experimentation and lifelong learning is essential. Employees must be encouraged to try out new technologies, accept mistakes, and learn from them.

Leaders play a key role in the cultural transformation process. They must not only define the vision and strategy but also act as role models and embody the values ​​of an AI-oriented culture. Leadership development programs can help raise the necessary awareness and skills. Without visible commitment from top management, AI projects lack the necessary momentum. Medium-sized manufacturing companies that significantly increased acceptance through comprehensive change management approaches, including information sessions, targeted training, and employee involvement in the implementation process, demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.

Germany's position in global competition

In international comparisons of AI development, Germany occupies an ambivalent position. According to the Global AI Index, the Federal Republic ranks seventh overall: a solid result, but still behind leading nations such as the USA, China, Singapore, and several European countries. This ranking reflects both the strengths and weaknesses of the German AI ecosystem. Germany is among the world leaders in AI research. Universities, institutes, and competence centers are conducting important foundational work, from machine learning to ethical issues. Germany ranks third worldwide in the training of IT professionals.

However, a gap exists between research and practical application. Germany struggles to translate scientific findings into real-world applications. There is a significant need to catch up in terms of AI infrastructure: In the Global AI Index, Germany ranks only 13th in this area. The main issues are computing power and data availability. The capacity of high-performance data centers for AI applications must triple by 2030, from the current 1.6 gigawatts to 4.8 gigawatts. Currently, however, only 0.7 gigawatts are under construction and another 1.3 gigawatts are in development. To close this 1.4-gigawatt capacity gap, up to 60 billion euros must be invested by 2030.

Germany's share of global data center capacity has fallen by around a third since 2015. Investments in AI lag far behind players like the US, the UK, France, other EU countries, and China. From the perspective of German companies, the US and China currently lead the field of generative AI. 36 percent see the US and 32 percent China as the frontrunners. Only one percent of German companies attribute a leading position to Germany. This assessment highlights the need for action facing German policymakers and businesses. 71 percent of companies are calling for stronger support for German AI providers and increased investment in data centers.

In the field of machine learning, Germany ranks fourth internationally with five known models. The US, however, dominates with 61 models, followed by China with 15. The gap is even more pronounced when it comes to investment: In 2023, around €67 billion of private capital flowed into AI technologies in the US, almost nine times more than in China. While investments in the US are steadily increasing, the EU has seen a decline of 44.2 percent since 2022. Germany has the potential to triple its computing capacity within five years, but this requires decisive action.

The global AI race between the US and China has gained new momentum through developments like China's DeepSeek model. While the US has traditionally been a leader in large-scale language models, Chinese companies are rapidly catching up. Top executives from Microsoft to OpenAI warned in May 2025 that the US lead in AI had shrunk to just a few months. Since 2017, China has pursued the stated strategy of becoming the leading AI nation by 2030. According to Gartner, 47 percent of the world's top AI researchers are from China, compared to only 18 percent from the US. China is scaling its infrastructure and applications far faster than the US.

A bipolar technological landscape is emerging for Germany and Europe. One bloc is forming around US technology like Nvidia and ARM with Western data standards, while the other revolves around China's ecosystem with Huawei Ascend and RISC-V. Neutrality is becoming increasingly impossible for countries like Germany. The question is no longer whether Germany can catch up, but rather in which technological ecosystem it positions itself and how it can maintain its own sovereignty in the process.

The strategic course setting for German companies

Germany is facing a strategic turning point. The AI ​​market in Germany is estimated to reach over nine billion euros by 2025 and is projected to grow to 37 billion euros by 2031, representing an annual growth rate of over 25 percent. However, this growth will not be evenly distributed. Companies that invest in AI now, build expertise, and transform their organizations will gain a decisive competitive advantage. Those that hesitate risk being left behind. The gap between leaders and laggards is widening rapidly.

Successful AI transformation requires more than just technological implementation. It demands a holistic strategy comprised of several pillars: First, strategic alignment with a clear vision, defined goals, and prioritized use cases. Without strategic anchoring at the top management level, AI initiatives remain isolated solutions without sustainable impact. Second, operational implementation with AI Centers of Excellence as hubs of expertise and consulting, standardized project management methods, reusable AI components, and proactive knowledge management. Third, risk and compliance with clear governance structures, risk classification according to the EU AI Regulation, data protection compliance, and ethical guidelines.

The fourth pillar comprises the technology infrastructure, including scalable cloud platforms, robust data pipelines, MLOps processes, and continuous monitoring. The fifth pillar encompasses people and culture, with systematic skills development, change management, fostering a culture of experimentation, and leadership commitment. AI transformation can only succeed when all five pillars work together.

Companies should start with manageable pilot projects that promise tangible benefits but are not business-critical. A phased approach reduces risks and fosters acceptance. Successful pilot projects build trust and momentum for further initiatives. Crucially, pilot projects must be designed with scalability in mind from the outset. The technical architecture, data processes, and organizational integration must be ready for production. AI implementation is not a one-off project, but an ongoing optimization process with continuous learning and adaptation.

The regulatory framework, including the EU AI Regulation and the GDPR, may initially seem like a burden, but it also offers opportunities. Those who invest now in transparency, documented processes, and proactive risk management are laying the foundation for trustworthy and competitive AI applications. The connection between data protection and AI risk assessment demonstrates that clear processes and defined responsibilities not only allow innovation to be controlled but also strategically shaped. Companies that view compliance as a competitive advantage rather than an obstacle position themselves as trusted partners.

Realistic future prospects beyond the hype

The transformation of the German economy through artificial intelligence has only just begun. The next five years will be crucial. Forecasts predict that between 2026 and 2030, up to 40 percent of medium-sized businesses will have integrated AI tools into their daily operations, particularly in sales, finance, and human resources. The proportion of companies that have fully integrated AI will rise significantly from the current nine percent. AI trends for the coming years include generative AI for automated content creation, AI customer service with 24/7 support, predictive analytics for sales forecasting, AI marketing with hyper-personalization, automated accounting, AI recruiting, and smart manufacturing with intelligent factories.

The impact on the labor market will be varied. According to the McKinsey Global Institute, around 30 percent of current working hours could be automated by technology, including generative AI, by 2030. However, this does not mean mass job losses, but rather a transformation of job profiles. Routine tasks will disappear, while the demand for higher-value, more creative, and more strategic work will increase. Already, 13 percent of employees in Germany report having lost their jobs due to AI, which is in line with the global average. At the same time, new job profiles and qualification requirements are emerging.

The overall economic productivity effects will be noticeable, but they won't work miracles. Annual productivity growth could rise from 0.4 to 0.9 percent between 2025 and 2030 and to 1.2 percent between 2030 and 2040. This would be a significant improvement that strengthens Germany's competitiveness and helps to mitigate the effects of demographic change. However, a productivity miracle, as some had hoped, will not materialize. AI is an important, but not the only, driver of economic growth. Accompanying investments in education, infrastructure, and innovation capacity are essential.

The geopolitical dimension of AI development will gain in importance. Technological competition between the US and China is forcing Germany and Europe to adopt strategic positions. The question of technological sovereignty is becoming more pressing: Can Europe develop its own AI models, infrastructures, and standards, or will it remain dependent on American or Chinese technologies? Programs such as Digital Europe and EuroHPC aim to provide European AI projects with access to high-performance computing. The success of these initiatives will determine Germany's and Europe's ability to act in the global AI competition.

The coming years will show whether Germany can translate its strengths in research and education into economic competitive advantages. The course is being set now. Companies that understand AI as a strategic issue, address it systematically, and transform their organizations will secure their future viability. Those who hesitate or dismiss AI as a passing fad will pay the price. The transformation from the pilot phase to productive use is well underway. Germany stands at the turning point between technological integration and falling behind. The decision rests with the corporate boards, management teams, and medium-sized businesses that are setting the course for tomorrow today.

A new dimension of digital transformation with 'Managed AI' (Artificial Intelligence) – Platform & B2B Solution | Xpert Consulting - Image: Xpert.Digital

Here you will learn how your company can implement customized AI solutions quickly, securely, and without high entry barriers.

A Managed AI Platform is your all-round, worry-free package for artificial intelligence. Instead of dealing with complex technology, expensive infrastructure, and lengthy development processes, you receive a turnkey solution tailored to your needs from a specialized partner – often within a few days.

The key benefits at a glance:

⚡ Fast implementation: From idea to operational application in days, not months. We deliver practical solutions that create immediate value.

🔒 Maximum data security: Your sensitive data remains with you. We guarantee secure and compliant processing without sharing data with third parties.

💸 No financial risk: You only pay for results. High upfront investments in hardware, software, or personnel are completely eliminated.

🎯 Focus on your core business: Concentrate on what you do best. We handle the entire technical implementation, operation, and maintenance of your AI solution.

📈 Future-proof & Scalable: Your AI grows with you. We ensure ongoing optimization and scalability, and flexibly adapt the models to new requirements.

More about it here:

• The Managed AI Solution - Industrial AI Services: The key to competitiveness in the services, industrial and mechanical engineering sectors

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

contact me under Wolfenstein ∂ Xpert.digital

call me under +49 89 674 804 (Munich)

LinkedIn
 

Our global industry and business expertise in business development, sales and marketing - Image: Xpert.Digital

Industry focus: B2B, digitalization (from AI to XR), mechanical engineering, logistics, renewable energies and industry

More about it here:

• Xpert Business Hub

A topic hub with insights and expertise:

• Knowledge platform on the global and regional economy, innovation and industry-specific trends
• Collection of analyses, impulses and background information from our focus areas
• A place for expertise and information on current developments in business and technology
• Topic hub for companies that want to learn about markets, digitalization and industry innovations