Between manual, semi-automated and fully automated high-bay warehouses – When does an automated high-bay warehouse really pay off?

The promise of automation – or the most expensive mistake companies make

When decision-makers in logistics and supply chain management evaluate the modernization of their warehouse systems today, they are often confronted with a seemingly simple narrative: automation equals efficiency, cost savings, and competitive advantage. However, the reality is considerably more complex. The question of whether a company should operate its high-bay warehouses manually, semi-automatically, or fully automatically is not a technological one, but rather a fundamentally economic decision that must be based on specific operational parameters, capital availability, and long-term strategic orientation. A detailed analysis of the three operating modes reveals differences that are often overlooked and lead to costly misinvestments.

The traditional manual high-bay warehouse: Flexibility as a strategic advantage

For many medium-sized businesses and specialized warehouse operators, manual high-bay warehouses still represent the more economically viable solution, especially when flexibility and adaptability are paramount. These systems are operated by specially trained personnel using forklifts or specialized high-bay warehouse vehicles. The key advantage lies in the minimal initial investment – ​​a company does not have to invest several million euros in highly complex automation systems before commencing operations or significantly expanding its facilities.

From a capital management perspective, this means that companies with limited capital budgets can quickly become operational. Variable costs, on the other hand, are transparent and directly controllable – if a company wants to increase output, it hires more skilled workers; if it wants to reduce it, shifts are cut. This flexibility is particularly valuable for companies with volatile demand patterns. A manual system can react much more easily to seasonal fluctuations, order peaks, and unexpected market swings than a fully automated system, which must be designed for constant capacity utilization.

However, closer examination reveals significant structural weaknesses. Personnel costs significantly dominate the cost structure of some high-bay warehouse operations. Studies show that order picking alone accounts for up to 55 percent of operational warehouse costs. In markets with continuously rising wages and a structural shortage of skilled workers—such as in Central Europe, where the demand for labor in logistics increased by 25 percent in 2022—these cost components are becoming increasingly difficult to control. Furthermore, manual warehouse management inevitably leads to higher error rates. Without additional quality control measures, error rates in manual warehouses typically range from ten to twelve percent, resulting in costly returns, complaints, and customer dissatisfaction.

Space efficiency is also a critical disadvantage. Manual high-bay warehouses can be operated economically up to a height of approximately 10 to 12 meters, as personnel deployment becomes increasingly inefficient with increasing height. This leads to a significantly higher footprint. For companies in metropolitan areas, where warehouse space is expensive or scarce, this disadvantage can necessitate relocation to the outskirts – with all the associated logistical and strategic consequences.

Partial automation: The underestimated middle ground of logistics rationality

Between fully manual and highly automated warehouses, a broader spectrum of solutions exists that appears to be underrepresented by many practitioners and strategic decision-makers. Semi-automated systems selectively combine human labor with automated processes to leverage the strengths of both approaches and minimize their weaknesses.

A common model combines stacker cranes with manual order picking processes in the upstream area. The high-bay warehouse itself is fully automated – stacker cranes handle storage and retrieval, controlled by a warehouse management system – while order picking and packing are done by employees. This already enables significant space savings and productivity increases, while the investment costs are considerably lower than those for fully automated systems. A medium-sized, semi-automated high-bay warehouse can be implemented for as little as one million euros – a fraction of the 5 to 20 million euros required for fully automated systems.

Another successful model is the application of pick-by-light or pick-by-voice systems in manual or semi-automated environments. These order picking systems use electronic shelf displays or voice-guided instructions to direct warehouse staff to the correct locations and indicate the quantities to be picked. The effectiveness is impressive: pick-by-light systems achieve up to 350 picks per hour, increasing performance by 40 percent compared to traditional methods. At the same time, picking errors are reduced by 15 percent, and with optional sensors, the overall quality improvement can reach 25 percent. These systems cost an average of €100 per storage location—significantly less than the cost of fully automated storage and retrieval systems—and can be integrated into existing warehouse structures.

A third model utilizes shuttle systems as a hybrid solution. Shuttle vehicles move automatically within aisles and position pallets or containers without the constant need for a dedicated storage and retrieval machine. This enables high throughput (aisle rates exceeding 150 double cycles per hour are common) with lower investment costs than complete storage and retrieval machine systems. Industry reports indicate that approximately 20 percent of automated warehouse projects utilize shuttle solutions, often in combination with traditional storage and retrieval machines for different storage areas.

Partially automated systems also offer an important psychological and operational prerequisite for successful implementation. They can be rolled out gradually, reducing the risk of costly implementation errors, and they allow companies to learn and optimize their processes before investing in full automation. The payback period for partial automation solutions is typically two to three years, which is already significantly shorter than that of manual systems, and the capital requirements are manageable for medium-sized businesses.

LTW Intralogistics – Engineers of Flow - Image: LTW Intralogistics GmbH

LTW offers its customers not individual components, but integrated complete solutions. Consulting, planning, mechanical and electrotechnical components, control and automation technology, as well as software and service – everything is networked and precisely coordinated.

In-house production of key components is particularly advantageous. This allows for optimal control of quality, supply chains, and interfaces.

LTW stands for reliability, transparency, and collaborative partnership. Loyalty and honesty are firmly anchored in the company's philosophy – a handshake still means something here.

Suitable for:

• LTW Solutions

Full automation: High performance at premium prices and under specific conditions

Fully automated high-bay warehouses represent the cutting edge of modern warehousing technology and offer unparalleled performance characteristics under the right conditions. Such a system is operated entirely with automated storage and retrieval machines, intelligent conveyor systems, warehouse management software, and, in many cases, additional robotics for order picking or packing. No human intervention is required in the core warehouse area.

The technical performance characteristics are spectacular. Fully automated high-bay warehouses can reach heights of up to 50 meters, resulting in a capacity increase of up to 85 percent compared to manual warehouses, while maintaining the same footprint. This is transformative for companies in metropolitan areas or with space-constrained locations. Throughput is also outstanding: Automated systems operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, without fatigue or loss of focus. They achieve productivity increases of 25 to 70 percent compared to manual systems, depending on the application and warehouse size.

Error rates are negligible. While manual systems, even with quality control, still exhibit an error rate of around one percent, fully automated systems can achieve inventory accuracy of over 99 percent. This has cascading effects on the entire supply chain: Fewer returns mean less packaging material, lower storage costs for returns management, and higher customer satisfaction. The investment in such a system is justified by these quality gains, even from an insurance perspective.

Operating cost calculations paint a more nuanced picture. While a fully automated system requires significantly higher initial investments – €5 to €20 million for medium-sized systems, over €30 million for large European distribution centers – the amortization period is typically 18 to 24 months. This is remarkably short. In scenarios with high throughput (over 1,000 picks per day), amortization periods can drop to 12 to 18 months. According to Deloitte, companies in such cases achieve an average return on investment of 18 to 24 months, which corresponds to an annual return of approximately 50 to 100 percent.

However, these figures mask important assumptions. Fully automated systems only function optimally under conditions of high and constant utilization. They must be designed for the expected peak volume, which means that significant overcapacity exists during off-peak periods. The system's fixed costs—energy consumption, maintenance, insurance—are completely independent of the actual utilization. This can lead to problematic scenarios in seasonal industries, where an expensive automated system might be operating at 40 percent capacity in January.

Furthermore, fully automated systems require a high degree of complexity in their integration with upstream and downstream processes. If goods receipt is not automated, a bottleneck arises. If packaging or shipping is done manually, the benefits of warehouse automation cannot be fully realized. Incomplete automation across the entire value chain can lead to frustration and cause the actual ROI to fall significantly short of theoretical calculations.

The economic decision logic: thresholds and critical parameters

The choice between manual, semi-automated, and fully automated systems should not be based on technological trends, but rather on concrete cost models. The critical thresholds are known and should be evaluated using standardized methods.

For manual systems, this solution is typically worthwhile with daily throughput of less than 500 picks, a limited product range, and a regional cost environment with relatively low labor costs. In markets like Germany or Switzerland, where skilled warehouse workers cost 15 to 20 euros per hour, this threshold is quickly exceeded.

Semi-automated systems are economically viable for daily throughputs between 500 and 2,000 picks, medium-sized product ranges, and when space constraints are not critical but there is significant potential for cost reduction or efficiency gains. Implementation risks are considerably lower in these cases, as they often involve proven technologies, and the payback periods are attractive even for risk-averse investors.

Fully automated systems become cost-effective with a daily throughput of 1,000 to 2,000 picks or more, especially when space is limited or costs are high. They are also advantageous when the product range is very large (over 2,000 different SKUs) and manual locating and selection is no longer efficient.

Another critical factor is the stability and predictability of business volumes. Companies with high volatility—such as mail-order businesses with strong seasonal fluctuations—must weigh the high fixed costs of an automated system against the flexibility of a manual system. A frequently overlooked reality is that automated systems require 60 to 80 percent of their full capacity to be more cost-efficient than manual systems. If throughput is lower, manual or semi-automated systems can be more profitable.

Staff availability is a greatly underestimated factor. In regions with a shortage of skilled workers – almost everywhere in Central Europe – automation is increasingly no longer optional, but necessary to remain competitive. If a company cannot achieve the required storage capacity with its available staff without automation, the investment in automated systems quickly pays for itself, regardless of cost calculations.

Implementation risks and loss of touch with reality

An often overlooked dimension is the implementation risk. Fully automated systems are highly complex machine-software hybrids. A faulty implementation can lead to months of downtime. Semi-automated systems, especially pick-by-light solutions, are significantly less prone to errors and can be introduced gradually.

Moreover, the reality of cost calculations is often harsh. Many full automation projects exceed their budgets by 15 to 30 percent, and implementation takes longer than planned. Hidden costs for software integration, consulting, training, and contingency support almost always arise. A budget of 5 million euros quickly becomes 7 million euros. This significantly extends the amortization period.

The operational risk is also real. An automated system is only as good as its warehouse management system. Weak data management, inconsistent input, or outdated SKU master data can cause even a state-of-the-art system to make mistakes or operate inefficiently.

Sustainability as a new decision criterion

A modern decision criterion that has received too little attention so far is energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. Fully automated systems consume more energy than manual systems due to their constant operational readiness. However, this disadvantage can be reversed in cold storage facilities: Automated high-bay warehouses with smaller storage areas require less cooling capacity, which can reduce electricity consumption by 10 to 15 percent. This saving can lead to significant environmental and financial benefits over the life cycle costs.

For companies with sustainability ambitions and corporate social responsibility obligations, automation can therefore also represent added value from an efficiency point of view.

Contextualized rationality over technological obsession

Despite these claims, the reality of modern warehousing is that there is no universally correct answer to the question of whether a company should operate its high-bay warehouse manually, semi-automatically, or fully automatically. The choice depends on a number of factors – cost environment, demand volatility, availability of skilled workers, available space, capital resources, product range complexity, and anticipated future developments.

For many medium-sized and specialized warehouse operators, partial automation – particularly through pick-by-light systems, shuttle solutions, or stacker cranes in hybrid configurations – represents the optimal solution. It offers significant efficiency gains and cost reductions with considerably lower capital expenditure and implementation risk than full automation.

Fully automated systems pay off under conditions of consistently high utilization, large product variety, and substantial space costs. They are not always the best solution, even if technology providers might claim otherwise.

Manual systems, on the other hand, will in most cases be outdated in the Central European context of 2025 – they are too labor-intensive, too prone to errors, and require too much space. However, there are niches where they remain economically viable.

The key recommendation for decision-makers: Banish the obsession with technology and conduct an objective, data-driven cost analysis. Utilize total cost of ownership calculations over a multi-year horizon. Seriously evaluate partial automation as a viable alternative, not just a transitional phase. And ensure that the implementation not only optimizes individual warehouse processes but also considers the entire value chain. Within this framework, you will find the most profitable and future-proof solution for your operations.

☑️ Our business language is English or German

☑️ NEW: Correspondence in your national language!

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve you and my team as a personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) . My email address is: wolfenstein ∂ xpert.digital

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development / Marketing / PR / Trade Fairs

Benefit from Xpert.Digital's extensive, fivefold expertise in a comprehensive service package | R&D, XR, PR & Digital Visibility Optimization - Image: Xpert.Digital

Xpert.Digital has in-depth knowledge of various industries. This allows us to develop tailor-made strategies that are tailored precisely to the requirements and challenges of your specific market segment. By continually analyzing market trends and following industry developments, we can act with foresight and offer innovative solutions. Through the combination of experience and knowledge, we generate added value and give our customers a decisive competitive advantage.

More about it here:

• Use the 5x expertise of Xpert.Digital in one package - starting at just €500/month

Our global industry and business expertise in business development, sales and marketing - Image: Xpert.Digital

Industry focus: B2B, digitalization (from AI to XR), mechanical engineering, logistics, renewable energies and industry

More about it here:

• Xpert Business Hub

A topic hub with insights and expertise:

• Knowledge platform on the global and regional economy, innovation and industry-specific trends
• Collection of analyses, impulses and background information from our focus areas
• A place for expertise and information on current developments in business and technology
• Topic hub for companies that want to learn about markets, digitalization and industry innovations