EU Commission approves five billion euro funding package for German industry

Industrial transformation is the order of the day

The European Union, and Germany in particular, faces one of the greatest challenges in its economic history: the profound transformation of its industrial landscape towards climate neutrality. The industrial sector, traditionally the backbone of the German economy and a guarantor of prosperity and jobs, is simultaneously one of the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions. The need to drastically reduce these emissions arises not only from the pressing environmental demands of climate change, but increasingly also from economic constraints. Global markets, investors, and consumers are demanding ever more vehemently sustainable products and production methods. At the same time, regulatory frameworks are becoming increasingly stringent worldwide.

Against this backdrop, the European Commission has given the green light to a significant financing instrument: a €5 billion funding pool specifically designed to support German industry in decarbonizing its energy-intensive processes. This decision is more than just a financial allocation; it is a clear political signal and a building block in the comprehensive strategy to future-proof the European economy. The program is specifically aimed at companies whose emissions are regulated by the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and is intended to help them manage the often immense investment costs of switching to climate-friendly technologies. The key lever for this is so-called "carbon contracts," also known as Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfDs).

This initiative promises not only significant contributions to achieving ambitious climate goals – Germany aims for climate neutrality by 2045, the EU by 2050 – but also aims to secure the long-term competitiveness of German industry. In a global economy that is inexorably moving towards sustainability, the ability to produce with low carbon emissions is a crucial factor for business location. Those who fall behind in this area risk losing market share and technological leadership.

However, such an ambitious program is not without potential hurdles and criticisms. Questions about the actual efficiency of the resources deployed, the possible focus on certain, perhaps risky, technologies, the dependence on global supply chains, and fair coordination within the European single market accompany the initiative. This analysis will illuminate the various facets of the funding program, from the official framework and the functioning of climate agreements to the expected impacts and the associated debates.

Suitable for:

• Climate neutrality: A comprehensive guide for companies – Whitepaper Notes & Analysis

Industrial emissions, climate targets and the EU ETS

The industrial emissions burden

The industrial sector is responsible for a significant share of greenhouse gas emissions in Germany and the EU. Industries such as steel and cement production, the chemical industry, and refineries are inherently energy-intensive and release large quantities of CO2 during their conventional processes. Without a fundamental shift in these processes, national and European climate targets are unattainable. The urgency is underscored by the increasingly noticeable consequences of climate change and growing societal pressure. The transition to a climate-neutral industry is therefore no longer an option, but a necessity.

The EU Green Deal as a guiding principle

With its "European Green Deal," the European Union has presented a comprehensive roadmap to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. This package includes a wide range of measures, from promoting renewable energies and the circular economy to sustainable mobility. A key component is the transformation of industry. Initiatives such as the "Fit for 55" package, which aims to reduce EU emissions by at least 55 percent by 2030 compared to 1990, significantly tighten the requirements for the industrial sector. The now-approved German funding program fits seamlessly into this overarching strategy and represents a concrete national implementation of European goals.

The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS): Both engine and brake

Since its introduction in 2005, the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) has been the EU's central climate protection instrument for industry and the energy sector. It operates on a cap-and-trade principle: A cap sets the maximum permissible total amount of emissions for the covered installations. This cap decreases over time. Companies need an emissions allowance for every ton of CO2 emitted. Some of these allowances are allocated free of charge (primarily to protect international competitiveness and prevent carbon leakage), while others are auctioned. Companies can sell surplus allowances or must purchase additional allowances if they emit more than they received free of charge. This trading creates a market price for CO2 emissions.
The ETS has undoubtedly contributed to emissions reductions by providing a financial incentive to avoid CO2. However, it has become clear that the CO2 price alone, particularly when subject to strong fluctuations or perceived as too low, is often insufficient to stimulate the extremely capital-intensive investments in entirely new technologies necessary for profound decarbonization. This is where the so-called "investment gaps" arise. The new German funding program addresses precisely this issue: it aims to close this gap by providing targeted financial support to companies covered by the ETS that are prepared to introduce innovative, but not yet competitive, climate-friendly production processes. It thus complements the price signal of the ETS through direct project funding.

Official approval and core elements of the program

In March 2025 (based on the dates in the original text), the European Commission announced that it had approved the German funding program amounting to five billion euros under EU state aid rules. This approval is a necessary step, as state subsidies can potentially distort competition in the EU single market. The Commission therefore examines whether such funding is necessary, appropriate, and proportionate, and whether its positive effects (e.g., for environmental protection) outweigh any potential distortions of competition.

In its justification, the Commission emphasized that the program makes an important contribution to achieving Germany's and the EU's ambitious climate and energy targets. It aims to support energy-intensive companies subject to the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) in transitioning to decarbonized production processes. The Commission's Executive Vice-President for Competition Policy and the Green Transition (referred to in the original text as Teresa Ribera, whose specific role may vary at the hypothetical time, but the function is relevant) underscored the importance of the measure. From the Commission's perspective, the funding will enable ambitious projects that lead to a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and simultaneously contribute to achieving climate neutrality by 2050. At the same time, it is ensured that any potential distortions of competition are kept to a minimum.

The supported technological pathways are deliberately diverse to meet the different needs of various industries. These include:

electrification

Replacing fossil fuels with electricity from renewable sources wherever this makes technical and economic sense (e.g. in certain chemical processes or through the use of electrode boilers).

hydrogen

The use of green (produced from renewable energy sources) or blue (produced from natural gas with CO2 capture) hydrogen as an energy carrier or raw material, especially in areas that are difficult to electrify (e.g. steel production via direct reduction, high-temperature processes).

Carbon capture and storage (CCS)

The capture of CO2 directly at the emission source (e.g. cement plant, waste incineration plant) and the subsequent permanent geological storage.

Carbon capture and utilization (CCU)

The capture of CO2 and its subsequent use as a raw material for other products (e.g. chemicals, synthetic fuels).

Energy efficiency

Measures to significantly reduce energy consumption in production processes, going beyond the usual standards.

Although the original text contained no direct quotes from the German government regarding the specific approval of this five-billion-euro fund, Berlin's position can be inferred. The German government, particularly the Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action, has repeatedly emphasized the necessity of such instruments and promoted climate agreements as a key tool for industrial decarbonization. Similar EU approvals for large-scale projects, such as in the semiconductor sector, have been positively received by government representatives like Economics Minister Robert Habeck. It can therefore be assumed that the German government views the approval of this program as a significant success in achieving national climate targets and strengthening Germany's position as an industrial hub in the global competition for green technologies.

Suitable for:

• Climate neutrality for companies? How do I get started? – Corporate responsibility, sustainability goals and climate targets

How it works and the conditions: Who gets money and for what?

The core of the program is not a blanket distribution of funds, but a sophisticated system aimed at efficiency and effectiveness.

Ambitious emission reduction targets

To be eligible for funding, projects must demonstrate strict and binding emission reduction targets. Within just three years of project launch, emissions must be reduced by at least 60 percent. By the project's completion (typically after the 15-year contract period), a reduction of 90 percent must be achieved. The emission levels of a reference system based on the conventional EU ETS standards serve as the benchmark. These stringent requirements are designed to ensure that only truly transformative projects that make a substantial contribution to decarbonization are funded, and not mere superficial solutions or minor optimizations.

Broad sector coverage

The program is generally open to companies from all sectors covered by the EU Emissions Trading System. This includes key industries such as chemicals, steel, cement, lime, non-ferrous metals, glass, ceramics, paper, and, to some extent, food processing. These sectors often face similar challenges: high process temperatures, complex chemical reactions, and a heavy reliance on fossil fuels or raw materials. This broad scope makes it possible to promote decarbonization solutions where they are most urgently needed and where the greatest reduction potential exists. Examples of eligible projects could include switching from coal to hydrogen in steel production (direct reduction plants), using green electricity and biomass instead of natural gas in basic chemical production, or deploying CCS technology in cement plants.

competitive tendering procedure

Funding is not allocated indiscriminately, but through a transparent and competitive tendering process. Companies submit their project proposals, specifying the amount of funding they require per ton of CO2 avoided to cover the additional costs of their climate-friendly technology compared to conventional production. The projects are then ranked according to this criterion – the lowest requested funding per ton of CO2 avoided. The projects with the best cost-benefit ratio are awarded funding until the budget available for the respective tendering round is exhausted. This mechanism aims to maximize cost efficiency and ensure that every euro invested achieves the greatest possible climate impact. It also incentivizes companies to develop and offer the most innovative and cost-effective decarbonization solutions possible.

The core mechanism: Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfDs)

The actual financial support is handled through so-called Climate Change Contracts (CCfDs). This instrument is relatively new in climate policy, but is considered promising for closing the investment gap in green technologies.

Bridging the cost gap

The basic idea behind CCfDs is to offset the difference between the (often higher) costs of production using a new, climate-friendly technology and the costs of conventional, emissions-intensive production (or alternatively, the revenue that would be generated from the sale of ETS allowances). For example, a company that produces green steel using hydrogen initially has significantly higher production costs than a competitor that uses the conventional blast furnace process. The climate agreement compensates for this difference and makes the investment in green technology economically viable.

Long-term planning security

The contracts have a term of 15 years. This long duration is crucial, as it provides companies with the necessary planning and investment security to undertake the often multi-billion-euro modernizations of their plants. They know that the additional costs are covered over a long period, regardless of short-term fluctuations in energy or CO2 prices.

Double-sided mechanism

A special feature of the CCfDs provided for in the German program is their "two-sided" nature. This means:

As long as climate-friendly production is more expensive than conventional production (or the CO2 price is too low to offset the difference), the state (the German government) pays the company the agreed difference as a subsidy. The amount of this subsidy is based on the company's initial bid in the tender process but is adjusted to reflect actual market developments (e.g., ETS certificate prices, energy prices).

However, should climate-friendly technology unexpectedly become cheaper than conventional production over the course of 15 years (e.g., due to technological advancements, economies of scale, or very high CO2 prices), the payment flow will reverse. In that case, the company will have to repay the "excess profits" to the state.

This two-sided mechanism has two key advantages: It protects companies from unforeseen losses, but it also protects taxpayers from excessive subsidies if green technologies gain market acceptance faster than expected. It ensures that public funds are used efficiently and are not permanently paid for technologies that are already profitable. In the long term, CCfDs are intended to help the supported technologies reach market maturity and become competitive without government assistance.

From local to global: SMEs conquer the global market with clever strategies - Image: Xpert.Digital

At a time when a company's digital presence determines its success, the challenge is how to make this presence authentic, individual and far-reaching. Xpert.Digital offers an innovative solution that positions itself as an intersection between an industry hub, a blog and a brand ambassador. It combines the advantages of communication and sales channels in a single platform and enables publication in 18 different languages. The cooperation with partner portals and the possibility of publishing articles on Google News and a press distribution list with around 8,000 journalists and readers maximize the reach and visibility of the content. This represents an essential factor in external sales & marketing (SMarketing).

More about it here:

• Authentic. Individually. Global: The Xpert.Digital strategy for your company

Goals and expected impacts: More than just emissions reduction

The goals of the five-billion-euro program go beyond mere CO2 reduction and touch upon key aspects of German economic and industrial policy.

Decarbonization as the main goal

The primary focus is on significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions in energy-intensive industrial sectors. Each funded project must demonstrate substantial reductions (60% or 90%). Overall, the program aims to make a measurable contribution to achieving Germany's climate targets (climate neutrality by 2045) and European requirements (Green Deal, Fit for 55). It represents a clear commitment to implementing the climate pledges made in core industrial sectors.

Strengthening industrial competitiveness

Equally important is the goal of securing the future viability of Germany as an industrial location. The funding is intended to help companies not only to cope with technological change, but also to actively shape it and assume a pioneering role. This has several dimensions:
First-mover advantages: Companies that switch to climate-friendly processes early on can secure know-how and technological leadership and tap into new markets for "green products," for which global demand is increasing.

Avoiding carbon leakage and CBAM costs: By decarbonizing production in Germany, the risk of companies relocating their production to countries with laxer environmental regulations (carbon leakage) is reduced. Furthermore, companies that demonstrably produce cleanly can avoid potential costs from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), which aims to increase the cost of imports from countries with lower CO2 prices.

Independence from fossil fuels: The transition to electricity from renewable sources and green hydrogen reduces dependence on volatile global fossil fuel markets and increases energy security.
Innovation and efficiency: The need to fundamentally rethink production processes can trigger innovation and lead to efficiency gains that go beyond mere emissions reduction.

The European Commission emphasized in its approval that the initiative is in line with the EU's overarching goals of promoting sustainable prosperity and maintaining the competitiveness of European industry. Investment in future technologies is seen as key to securing jobs and value creation in Europe in the long term.

Minimizing distortions of competition:

Since this involves state aid, the European Commission's review was crucial. It concluded that while the measure selectively supports companies, its impact on competition and trade within the EU is limited and justified. In particular, the open, competitive tendering process was viewed positively, as it ensures that funding is allocated efficiently and that individual companies are not unfairly favored. The dual nature of CCfDs also helps to avoid overcompensation. The benefits for climate protection and industrial transformation were thus deemed to outweigh the potential negative effects on the internal market.

Suitable for:

• What impact will the carbon tax have on companies in the next few years if they do not reduce carbon emissions?

Potential criticisms, concerns and challenges

Despite its positive objectives and well-thought-out design, the funding program is not without controversy and faces various challenges.

Efficiency of subsidies

There is ongoing debate about whether direct subsidies are the most efficient way to achieve climate goals. Critics argue that such programs can be bureaucratic and may not always promote the most cost-effective solutions. Furthermore, there are concerns that while subsidies may reduce production costs, they do not automatically generate sufficient demand for the more expensive green products. If end consumers or processing industries are unwilling to pay a "green premium," subsidized companies could be left with unsold products despite receiving the subsidy. A successful transformation therefore often also requires demand-side measures (e.g., green public procurement, product standards).

Manufacturing capacities and supply chain dependencies

A key obstacle to the rapid implementation of industrial transformation in Europe is its dependence on imports of key technologies and raw materials. There is a particularly strong reliance on China for components for renewable energy (solar cells, wind turbines), batteries, electrolyzers for hydrogen production, and critical raw materials (such as rare earth elements). European manufacturing capacities in these areas are often still insufficient. Even if funding is available, supply chain bottlenecks or geopolitical tensions could slow down or increase the cost of ramping up green technologies. The effectiveness of the funding program therefore also depends on Europe's ability to strengthen its own technological sovereignty.

Focus on carbon capture and storage (CCS/CCU)

The explicit inclusion of CCS and CCU as eligible technologies has drawn criticism from some environmental organizations and scientists. They argue that CCS/CCU does not represent genuine emissions reduction, but merely a downstream approach to treating symptoms. The technology is energy-intensive and expensive, and the long-term safety of geological CO2 storage has not yet been conclusively proven. Furthermore, significant logistical challenges exist in transporting and storing the enormous quantities of CO2. There are concerns that the availability of CCS as an option could reduce the pressure on companies to fundamentally convert their processes to emission-free alternatives (such as hydrogen or electrification) ("moral hazard"). Some critics therefore describe programs with a strong focus on CCS as more "industry-friendly than truly climate-friendly." Proponents, on the other hand, consider CCS/CCU indispensable for controlling emissions in certain "hard-to-avoid" sectors such as the cement industry or waste incineration.

Industry perspective (e.g. BDI)

The Federation of German Industries (BDI) generally supports the goal of decarbonization, but simultaneously calls for improved framework conditions to avoid jeopardizing the global competitiveness of companies. In addition to subsidies, the federation demands, above all, competitive energy prices (especially for electricity), a significant reduction in bureaucracy in planning and approval processes, and the rapid expansion of the necessary infrastructure (electricity grids, hydrogen pipelines, charging infrastructure). The BDI emphasizes the need for an "intelligent combination of growth and climate protection" that ensures the transformation does not lead to deindustrialization. Industry often finds itself confronted with a conflict of objectives between ambitious climate targets and the pressures of international markets.

Risk of unequal competitive conditions in the EU

One concern, voiced particularly in smaller or economically weaker EU member states, relates to state aid rules. In recent years, these rules have been made more flexible, partly in response to crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine (e.g., through the Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework – TCTF). This allows member states, under certain conditions, to subsidize their industries more heavily. Critics fear that wealthier countries like Germany could exploit these loopholes more effectively than poorer countries, potentially leading to a subsidy race and fragmentation of the single market. While the European Commission is careful to minimize distortions of competition when approving the German program, concerns about a potential imbalance within the EU persist.

More challenges

In addition, there are other aspects such as the enormous need for skilled workers for the planning, construction and operation of the new plants, the administrative effort for companies in the application and reporting process, as well as the risk of relying on technologies that later prove to be non-scalable or uneconomical (technology trap).

Suitable for:

• Green Deal? We now also need an Industrial Deal – to expand our innovation lead and maintain our competitiveness

Timeline and implementation: A multi-stage process

The implementation of the five billion euro program will not happen all at once, but in several steps via rounds of tenders.

Tender rounds

The current program builds on a similar, earlier initiative that was approved in February 2024. A first round of calls for proposals for climate protection contracts took place in 2024 and generated significant interest from companies, underscoring the need for such funding instruments. A second funding round has already been launched, with a deadline of May 15, 2025, for submitting project applications. The German government plans to open the actual auction (competitive bidding) for this second round later in 2025. Further rounds are likely to distribute the total budget of five billion euros gradually.

Payout mechanism

Once a company has been awarded a contract in a tender round and the climate protection agreement has been signed, funding begins. However, the funds are not disbursed as a single payment, but rather over the entire 15-year term of the contract. As described, the annual subsidies are based on the company's initial bid and the current market prices for energy and CO2 certificates. Crucially, the disbursement is linked to actual performance, i.e., to the proven reduction in emissions. This ensures accountability and guarantees that taxpayers' money is only used for climate protection measures that have actually been achieved.

Political framework

The continuation of the program over several years and potential further rounds of tenders could be influenced by the political priorities of future federal governments. The original text indicates that, for example, the conservative CDU has been critical of climate protection agreements in the past. Political changes could therefore have an impact on the long-term design and volume of funding, creating a degree of uncertainty for long-term industrial planning.

Key conditions of the 5 billion euro funding program

The key conditions of the €5 billion funding program include ambitious emissions reduction targets of 60% within three years and 90% by the end of the project, compared to ETS benchmarks. Various industries are eligible for funding, including the chemical industry, the metal industry (steel, non-ferrous metals), the building materials industry (cement, lime), glass, ceramics, and paper, provided they are covered by the EU ETS. Supported technologies include electrification, green and blue hydrogen, CCS (carbon capture and storage), CCU (carbon capture and utilization), and energy efficiency measures. The selection process is a competitive tender procedure, with the ranking determined by the lowest funding requested per tonne of CO2 avoided. Funding is provided through 15-year bilateral carbon contracts (Carbon Contracts for Difference). The total budget of the program is €5 billion.

An important building block with open questions

The European Commission's approval of the five billion euro funding program for the decarbonization of German industry is undoubtedly a significant step. It underscores the seriousness with which Germany and the EU are tackling the transformation of industry towards climate neutrality. With its Climate Change Contracts for Development (CCfDs), the program specifically addresses the key challenge of high initial investments and the lack of economic viability of new, climate-friendly technologies. The competitive tendering mechanism and the bilateral nature of the contracts are intelligent design elements aimed at cost efficiency and taxpayer protection.

The potential benefits are considerable: significant emission reductions in sectors that are difficult to decarbonize, strengthening the innovative capacity and long-term competitiveness of German industry, securing jobs and added value in the course of the green transition, and reducing dependence on fossil fuels.

At the same time, the challenges and risks must not be underestimated. The dependence on global supply chains, the technological uncertainties surrounding processes like CCS, the immense need for supporting infrastructure (energy and hydrogen networks, CO2 transport and storage), the necessity of competitive energy prices and fast permitting processes, as well as ensuring fair competition within the EU, are critical success factors. The question of public acceptance, particularly for CCS projects or infrastructure development, will also play a significant role.

The program's success will ultimately depend on its effective implementation, whether the funded projects achieve their ambitious goals, and whether the necessary framework for a successful industrial transformation can be established. It is an important piece of the puzzle in a complex overall picture, but not a panacea. The coming years will show whether this approach can truly lead German industry onto a sustainable and competitive path toward a climate-neutral future.

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form below or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) .

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

Xpert.Digital is a hub for industry with a focus on digitalization, mechanical engineering, logistics/intralogistics and photovoltaics.

With our 360° business development solution, we support well-known companies from new business to after sales.

Market intelligence, smarketing, marketing automation, content development, PR, mail campaigns, personalized social media and lead nurturing are part of our digital tools.

You can find out more at: www.xpert.digital - www.xpert.solar - www.xpert.plus