Meta is doing it like X: 'Community Notes' replace the 'fact check' – but there's a catch

Meta introduces "Community Notes" – A new era of content moderation with limitations

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, plans to introduce a new content moderation system called "Community Notes." This feature, strongly reminiscent of the model already implemented on Elon Musk's X platform (formerly Twitter), aims to involve users more in content moderation and combat the spread of misinformation. However, there's a crucial catch: "Community Notes" will apply exclusively to organic content—paid ads are excluded.

The most important changes and restrictions

1. Scope: The "Community Notes" apply only to organic posts, i.e., content for which Meta does not use advertising budgets. Paid ads are explicitly excluded from this feature.
2. Timeline: The rollout will be phased and will begin in the USA. Full implementation will be spread over several months and is expected to be further optimized throughout 2025.
3. Platforms: The three major meta-platforms are affected: Facebook, Instagram and Threads.

This model marks a turning point in Meta's approach to content moderation. While previously the focus was on a central fact-checking program, with "Community Notes" Meta aims to transfer responsibility for the accuracy of information to the community.

How do the "Community Notes" work?

The "Community Notes" system is based on active user participation and promotes decentralized moderation. The goal is to expose or supplement misinformation through comments and additional context.

Basic principle

• Users can add short comments to posts they consider misleading or in need of context.
• These comments are reviewed by other community members and only published if they are deemed "helpful".

participation

• Any user who meets certain criteria (e.g., a minimum age for the account and no rule violations) can register as a contributor.
• Notes must be precise and well-documented. They must be no longer than 280 characters and should be based on reliable sources.

Evaluation and publication

• Other contributors review the comments and rate them as "helpful" or "not helpful".
• A special algorithm ensures that only comments supported by users with different perspectives are published.
• The aim is to achieve the broadest possible consensus.

Why does Meta rely on "Community Notes"?

Meta is pursuing several goals with this initiative:

1. Promoting freedom of expression: The focus is on returning to the "roots of free speech". Instead of conducting centralized fact-checking, Meta wants to distribute the responsibility to its users.
2. Combating misinformation: By giving users the opportunity to flag and comment on misleading posts, misinformation should be identified more effectively and quickly.
3. Increased transparency: Involving the community makes the moderation process more transparent. Furthermore, the anonymity of participants should minimize potential bias.
4. An alternative to previous programs: Meta is replacing its central fact-checking program in the US with "Community Notes." This represents a significant shift in its strategic direction.

Criticism and challenges

Although the introduction of "Community Notes" is considered an innovative step, there is also criticism and potential problems:

Limitations in application

• Paid advertisements, which often have a significant influence on public opinion, are excluded from the feature. Critics see this as a weakness, as misinformation in advertisements could remain unfiltered.
• It remains unclear how organic contributions from brands, influencers, or political actors should be treated.

Risk of manipulation

• Since moderation depends on the community, there is a risk that well-organized groups will exploit the system to deliberately influence content.

Quality and objectivity

• Not all users possess the necessary media literacy to objectively evaluate information.
• There is a risk that personal biases will influence the decisions of those involved.

Complexity of consensus building

• The algorithmic approach to consensus building could lead to important comments not being published if they do not receive sufficient support.

Advantages of "Community Notes" over traditional fact checks

Despite the challenges, the new system offers some remarkable advantages:

1. Decentralization and diversity

• The involvement of numerous users ensures a greater diversity of perspectives.
• This reduces the risk of bias that can occur in central fact-checking organizations.

2. Faster response times

• Community Notes can be created in real time, allowing for a faster response to new trends or viral misinformation.

3. Promoting media literacy

• Users are encouraged to actively research and critically question sources.

4. Transparency and trust

• Since the process is publicly visible, community notes could strengthen users' trust in the platform.

5. Collaborative Assessment

• The consensus principle ensures that comments from users with different perspectives are evaluated and accepted.

The introduction of "Community Notes" marks a fundamental shift in Meta's content moderation strategy. While the model shows potential to combat misinformation more effectively and engage users more, its long-term effectiveness remains uncertain.

Potential further developments

• Expansion of the function to international markets
• Integration of AI-powered tools to support the community in moderation
• Improvements to the consensus-building algorithm

Implications for the advertising industry

The decision to exclude paid ads from "Community Notes" could have far-reaching consequences for the advertising industry. Brands and advertisers may need to adapt their strategies to meet the growing need for transparency and credibility.

With "Community Notes," Meta is taking a step into a new era of content moderation. Whether this approach will have the desired effect depends on how effectively the community is involved and whether Meta succeeds in addressing the system's weaknesses. The experiment could not only transform Meta's platforms but also redefine how misinformation is handled on social media as a whole.

From local to global: SMEs conquer the global market with clever strategies - Image: Xpert.Digital

At a time when a company's digital presence determines its success, the challenge is how to make this presence authentic, individual and far-reaching. Xpert.Digital offers an innovative solution that positions itself as an intersection between an industry hub, a blog and a brand ambassador. It combines the advantages of communication and sales channels in a single platform and enables publication in 18 different languages. The cooperation with partner portals and the possibility of publishing articles on Google News and a press distribution list with around 8,000 journalists and readers maximize the reach and visibility of the content. This represents an essential factor in external sales & marketing (SMarketing).

More about it here:

• Authentic. Individually. Global: The Xpert.Digital strategy for your company

Competition for X? Meta relies on user-based moderation – with one crucial difference

In a remarkable strategic realignment that inevitably draws comparisons to Elon Musk's X platform (formerly Twitter), Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, is introducing a new system of "Community Notes." This user-based moderation tool is intended to replace the existing, often criticized fact-checking programs. A key difference from X's model, however, is that Meta's "Community Notes" will not initially apply to paid advertisements. This feature, which aims to enrich organic content with additional context or corrections, is limited to posts for which Meta has not received direct financial support. Organic content thus includes all posts, images, videos, and text contributions created and shared by users and pages without paid promotion from Meta.

The cornerstones of the new system

The introduction of “Community Notes” marks a significant step in Meta’s approach to content moderation and combating misinformation. The key aspects of this new feature can be summarized as follows:

Scope

A key point is the restriction of "Community Notes" to organic content. Paid advertising remains unaffected by this system for the time being. This decision raises questions about responsibility for the accuracy of advertising messages and could lead to a division of the information landscape within the meta-platforms.

Definition of organic content

Organic content encompasses all posts that don't achieve greater reach through paid advertising. This includes everyday user posts, posts from friends and family, and also communication from brands and influencers, provided it isn't explicitly promoted. The gray area between organic and paid content, particularly in the field of influencer marketing, remains a point of discussion.

Timeframe of the introduction

Meta plans a phased rollout of "Community Notes." The United States will be the first to receive the feature, which is expected to be rolled out there in the coming months. It is anticipated that Meta will use the experience gained in the US to optimize the system before making it available in other regions and countries.

Affected platforms

The “Community Notes” feature is being rolled out across Meta’s entire ecosystem, including Facebook, Instagram, and the text-based platform Threads. This comprehensive implementation underscores the importance Meta places on this new approach.

Implications and open questions

The introduction of “Community Notes” has a number of implications and raises important questions, the answers to which will significantly influence the future use and acceptance of the system:

Treatment of brand communication

One of the key uncertainties concerns the handling of organic posts by brands and influencers. Are these posts treated the same as those from private individuals? What criteria are used to decide whether a comment is appropriate? The answer to these questions is crucial for companies' advertising and marketing strategies on meta-platforms. It remains to be seen whether brands will actively try to avoid "community notes" on their posts, or whether they might even use this system strategically to reinforce their messages.

Impact on the advertising industry

Meta's decision not to apply "Community Notes" to paid advertising is sparking lively discussions within the advertising industry. Advertisers now have to consider how to address the potential discrepancy between the possibility of labeling organic posts and the lack thereof for paid ads. This could lead to a shift in advertising budgets or the development of new strategies to increase the credibility of advertising messages.

Dealing with political content

The introduction of “Community Notes” is part of a broader restructuring of Meta’s handling of political content. The company has faced repeated criticism in the past regarding its role in spreading political misinformation. Shifting moderation responsibility to the community could be interpreted as an attempt to counter this criticism while simultaneously emphasizing freedom of expression. However, this approach also carries the risk that political factions might try to exploit the system for their own purposes.

Meta itself emphasizes that the details of the program are still under development and subject to change. This statement underscores the experimental nature of the new system and allows for adjustments based on user experiences and challenges that arise over time. Internally, the introduction of "Community Notes" is also interpreted as a return to the "roots of free speech" within the company, which critics, however, see as a pretext for reducing its own responsibility for content moderation.

How “Community Notes” works in detail

The core principle of “Community Notes” is to leverage the collective intelligence of the user base to contextualize or correct posts. The following explains how the system works in more detail:

User contributions

If a user sees a post they believe is misleading, false, or needs context, they can add a comment. This comment should be concise and ideally reference trustworthy sources to support the claim.

Community evaluation process

The comments you create are not immediately publicly visible, but undergo a review process. Other users who have registered as "Community Notes" contributors can rate these comments, indicating whether they find the comment helpful and informative or not.

Consensus building as a key

An intelligent algorithm analyzes the ratings of various users. Ratings from users who have previously expressed differing perspectives but nevertheless agree in their assessments are given particular weight. This consensus-building principle aims to ensure that only comments with broad acceptance within the community are published, and not those dominated by individual interest groups.

Visibility of annotations

Only comments that receive a sufficient number of positive ratings and demonstrate a consensus across different perspectives will be visible under the original post. This is intended to ensure the quality and relevance of the displayed information.

Objectives and the replacement of the fact-checking program

With the introduction of “Community Notes,” Meta is pursuing several strategic goals. A key objective is to reduce the spread of misinformation on its platforms. By giving users the opportunity to contextualize or correct posts themselves, a faster and more direct response to false information is to be enabled. Internally, this approach is also interpreted as a return to the “roots of free speech” within the company.

At the same time, the introduction of “Community Notes” marks the end of the previous fact-checking program in the US. Meta had previously collaborated with external fact-checking organizations to review controversial content. However, this program was repeatedly criticized, both by users who felt their freedom of expression was being restricted and by fact-checkers themselves who found working with Meta difficult. “Community Notes” thus represent an internal solution that is potentially more cost-effective and shifts greater responsibility for information quality to the user community.

Challenges and criticism of the new system

Despite its promising approaches, the “Community Notes” system also presents a number of challenges and criticisms:

Shifting responsibility

Greater community involvement in content moderation also means a shift in responsibility for the quality and accuracy of information to the users. Whether the community can fully live up to this responsibility remains to be seen. There is a risk that users may lack the necessary skills to correctly assess complex issues.

Loss of control over brand messaging

For companies and brands, the introduction of "Community Notes" represents a potential loss of control over their organic messaging. There is a risk that critical comments on their posts could negatively impact brand perception. The question is, how will brands deal with this new form of public discourse?.

Potential for errors and manipulation

A system that relies on the participation of a large number of users is potentially vulnerable to manipulation. Organized groups could attempt to influence the evaluation process to promote certain narratives or suppress unwelcome opinions. It is crucial that Meta implements mechanisms to detect and prevent such attempts.

Fears of an increased spread of misinformation

Critics fear that abolishing the established fact-checking program and simultaneously introducing an untested community-based system could even encourage the spread of misinformation, especially in the initial phase of implementation.

The parallel to X (formerly Twitter)

The comparison to the “Community Notes” system already implemented on X (also known there as “Community Notes”) is obvious. X also relies on the collective intelligence of its users to enrich posts with contextual information. However, there are also differences. For example, on X, paid ads are also tagged with “Community Notes.” Nevertheless, the introduction of this system on Meta marks a significant shift in content management strategy and is expected to significantly influence how users interact with information on these platforms. It remains to be seen whether Meta can learn from X's experiences and avoid its weaknesses.

Detailed explanation: The functionality of “Community Notes” in detail

To fully understand how “Community Notes” works, a closer look at the individual steps of the process is essential:

The basic principle of participatory moderation

At its core, “Community Notes” is based on the idea of ​​participatory moderation. Instead of Meta itself deciding on the accuracy of information as a central authority, this task is placed in the hands of the user community.

Participation and the writing of comments

Not every user can automatically write "Community Notes." Meta has established specific criteria that potential contributors must meet. These include, for example, a minimum account age and the absence of recent violations of the Community Standards. Users who meet these criteria can write comments on posts they consider misleading or inaccurate, or that require additional context. These comments are limited in length (similar to microblogging services) and should ideally be supported by credible sources to substantiate their claims. It's important to emphasize that these sources are not directly visible in the post but serve as a basis for discussion and evaluation by other users.

The multifaceted evaluation process

Once a note is posted, it undergoes a complex evaluation process. Other Community Notes contributors have the opportunity to rate this note, indicating whether they find it helpful or unhelpful. This evaluation process is not purely quantitative, however. An algorithm analyzes the ratings, taking a variety of factors into account.

The role of consensus building

A key element of the review process is consensus building. Comments rated as helpful by users with diverse perspectives and opinions are significantly more likely to be published. The system thus attempts to find a consensus on the accuracy or necessary context of a post that transcends partisan or ideological divides. This approach aims to ensure that the displayed comments enjoy broad acceptance and are not the result of manipulation by individual interest groups.

Publication and visibility for users

If a comment receives a sufficiently high number of positive ratings and there is broad consensus that it is helpful, it is published below the original post and is visible to all users. Interestingly, users who have previously interacted with a post that was later marked with a "Community Note" may also be notified. This is to ensure that the correction or additional context reaches those who have already seen the original post.

Anonymity and transparency in the system

To reduce potential bias and promote freedom of expression within the review process, "Community Notes" are published anonymously. The author's identity is not visible to other users. At the same time, Meta emphasizes transparency within the system itself. The fundamental principles of the review process and the criteria for participation as a contributor are publicly accessible.

Continuous improvement and gamification elements

The “Community Notes” system is not static but is continuously developed and improved. Meta analyzes user feedback and adjusts the algorithms and processes accordingly. To encourage active participation and the quality of contributions, gamification elements are also incorporated. Users who regularly write helpful notes can collect points and achieve “Top Writer” status, which may grant them additional rights or features within the system.

The advantages and disadvantages of “Community Notes” compared to traditional fact checks

The shift from traditional fact-checking to a community-based system like “Community Notes” brings with it specific advantages and disadvantages:

Advantages of decentralization and diversity

A key advantage of “Community Notes” lies in their decentralized nature. Unlike centralized fact-checking organizations, which may be subject to bias, “Community Notes” are created and reviewed by a wide range of users with diverse backgrounds and perspectives. This can lead to greater diversity of viewpoints and higher acceptance of the results, as the notes are perceived as more balanced and less dominated by a single authority.

Scalability and response speed

Another advantage is the system's potential scalability and responsiveness. By involving a large number of users, "Community Notes" can potentially review a much larger volume of content and react more quickly to new trends and emerging misinformation than would be possible with a limited team of fact-checkers. Raising awareness of misleading information in real time is a crucial factor in combating the spread of fake news.

Promoting the media literacy of users

“Community Notes” can also have a positive impact on users’ media literacy. By actively involving them in the information verification process, users are encouraged to conduct their own research, critically evaluate sources, and develop a deeper understanding of the complexity of information.

Independence and transparency

Ideally, “Community Notes” are more independent from government or corporate interests than professional fact-checkers, whose funding and orientation can sometimes raise questions. The transparent evaluation process of “Community Notes” can also strengthen user trust in the system. Since the selection process is publicly accessible, its traceability is increased.

Collaborative assessment as a quality criterion

The evaluation process, based on the consensus of various users, is another quality feature of “Community Notes”. The fact that a note has been rated as helpful by people with different perspectives increases its credibility.

Nevertheless, the disadvantages should not be ignored

There is a risk of manipulation by organized groups who might try to influence the evaluation process in their favor. The response time for flagging viral disinformation could be slower than with professional fact-checkers who have dedicated resources. And the reach of "Community Notes" may be limited, as not all users actively participate in the evaluation process. Therefore, "Community Notes" is not a panacea, but rather a complementary method for combating misinformation, with its own strengths and weaknesses.

A promising approach with open questions

Meta's introduction of "Community Notes" is a bold move with the potential to fundamentally change content moderation on social media. Shifting responsibility to the community offers opportunities for greater diversity and faster responses to misinformation. At the same time, the challenges and risks should not be underestimated. It remains to be seen how the system will perform in practice, whether it will succeed in preventing manipulation, and whether it will gain user trust. The coming months will show whether Meta's new approach truly provides a more effective way to manage the flood of information and disinformation on its platforms.

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form below or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) .

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

Xpert.Digital is a hub for industry with a focus on digitalization, mechanical engineering, logistics/intralogistics and photovoltaics.

With our 360° business development solution, we support well-known companies from new business to after sales.

Market intelligence, smarketing, marketing automation, content development, PR, mail campaigns, personalized social media and lead nurturing are part of our digital tools.

You can find out more at: www.xpert.digital - www.xpert.solar - www.xpert.plus