Twelve minutes over foreign territory – emergency takeoff over the Baltic Sea: Italian F-35s chase Russian jets out of NATO airspace

Red line crossed? What the Russian provocation means for European security

On Friday morning, September 19, 2025, a serious incident occurred over the Gulf of Finland, further escalating tensions between Russia and NATO. Three Russian MiG-31 Foxhound fighter jets entered Estonian airspace without authorization and remained there for an exceptionally long twelve minutes. The incident occurred near the Baltic Sea island of Vaindloo over the Gulf of Finland, a strategically important sea area between Estonia and Finland.

The Russian fighter jets violated all international aviation regulations: They had not submitted flight plans to Estonian air traffic control, their electronic identifiers were deactivated, and they did not maintain radio contact with Estonian air traffic control. This behavior violates fundamental norms of international civil aviation and is considered a clear provocation.

Suitable for:

• Growing tensions on NATO's eastern flank: After drone attack in Poland, now the Russian exercise Sapad 2025

Immediate NATO response by Italian F-35 jets

NATO responded immediately to the airspace violation. Italian F-35 fighter jets from Task Force Air – 32nd Wing, operating from Ämari Air Base in Estonia as part of the Baltic Air Policing mission since August 2025, immediately launched an interception maneuver. These F-35 Lightning II jets, on NATO Quick Reaction Alert duty, intercepted the Russian aircraft and escorted them out of Estonian airspace.

The Italian Air Force had only taken over responsibility for Baltic air policing from the Portuguese Air Force on August 1, 2025. Operation Baltic Eagle III marked Italy's fourth participation in the Baltic Air Policing Mission and the second with F-35 fighter jets. The Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania do not have their own combat aircraft, so NATO allies alternate protecting their airspace in four-month rotations.

Estonian outrage and diplomatic consequences

The Estonian government reacted with strong condemnation of the Russian incursion. Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna described the incident as unprecedentedly brazen and emphasized the particular gravity of the provocation. Russia had already violated Estonian airspace four times this year – on May 13, June 22, September 7, and now on September 19 – but the current violation involving three combat aircraft over such a long period represented a new level of escalation.

The Estonian Foreign Ministry immediately summoned the highest-ranking Russian diplomat in the country and presented a formal note of protest. Tsahkna called for a rapid increase in political and economic pressure on Russia in response to its increasing border crossings and growing aggression. Prime Minister Kristen Michal condemned the airspace violation as absolutely unacceptable and announced far-reaching consequences.

Activation of NATO Article 4

In direct response to the Russian provocation, Estonia activated Article 4 of the NATO Treaty on Friday and requested formal consultations with all allies. This article provides for consultations among NATO member states if one of them perceives a threat to its territorial integrity, political independence, or national security.

Article 4 is a rare and significant instrument in NATO history. Since the Alliance's founding in 1949, it has been invoked only eight times. The most recent activation was on February 24, 2022, when eight Eastern European NATO states requested consultations following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The NATO North Atlantic Council announced that consultations on the Estonian incident will take place in Brussels early next week.

International reactions and solidarity

The international community responded with broad support for Estonia and strong condemnation of Russia. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte stated that the Alliance had responded swiftly and decisively to the Russian airspace violation. NATO spokeswoman Allison Hart described the incident as another example of Russia's reckless behavior, but at the same time emphasized NATO's ability to respond appropriately.

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul condemned the violation of Estonian airspace as unacceptable and assured the government in Tallinn of Germany's full solidarity. EU High Representative Kaja Kallas, herself an Estonian, spoke of an extremely dangerous provocation and warned that Putin was testing the West's resolve. She emphasized that the EU must not show any weakness and pledged the European Union's full support to her homeland.

EU Council President Antonio Costa announced that heads of state and government will discuss a collective response to Russia's violation of European airspace at their meeting in Copenhagen on October 1. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen commented that as the threats escalate, so will the pressure on Russia.

Russian denials and counterarguments

Russia immediately denied the allegations of airspace violations. According to the state news agency TASS, the Russian Defense Ministry stated that the flight was conducted in strict compliance with international airspace rules and did not violate the borders of other countries. The MiG-31s ​​did not deviate from the agreed flight route and did not violate Estonian airspace.

According to the Russian account, the route led over neutral waters more than three kilometers north of the Estonian Baltic Sea island of Vaindloo. The ministry claimed that the aircraft flew from Karelia to the Kaliningrad region, and this was confirmed by objective surveillance. However, this account directly contradicts the statements of the Estonian authorities and NATO, which confirmed the incident beyond doubt.

Technical details of the MiG-31 fighter jets

The MiG-31 fighter jets involved in the airspace violation are among the most powerful and fastest interceptors in the world. The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-31, NATO reporting name Foxhound, reaches a top speed of 3,000 kilometers per hour and can reach altitudes of up to 24,400 meters. With a maximum takeoff weight of 46,200 kilograms and two Solovyov D-30-F6 turbofan engines, it is twice as heavy as a Eurofighter.

The interceptor has been in service since 1981 and was specifically developed for engaging long-range targets. The powerful Zaslon radar allows the modernized MiG-31BM version to track up to 24 air targets and engage six of them simultaneously. Its radar range is 320 kilometers, and the R-37M missile can engage enemy aircraft at a distance of more than 280 kilometers.

Of particular concern is the MiG-31K variant's ability to carry Kinzhal hypersonic missiles. This development has significantly increased the threat potential of these already dangerous interceptors, making them a vital component in Russia's military arsenal.

Hub for security and defense - Image: Xpert.digital

The hub for security and defense offers well-founded advice and current information in order to effectively support companies and organizations in strengthening their role in European security and defense policy. In close connection to the SME Connect working group, he promotes small and medium -sized companies (SMEs) in particular that want to further expand their innovative strength and competitiveness in the field of defense. As a central point of contact, the hub creates a decisive bridge between SME and European defense strategy.

Suitable for:

• The Working Group Defense of the SME Connect - Strengthening SMEs in European defense

Further provocations and escalation

The incident over Estonia was not isolated, but part of a series of Russian provocations in the Baltic Sea region. Just hours after the airspace violation over Estonia, Poland reported another incident. Two Russian fighter jets approached a Polish drilling platform in the Baltic Sea at low altitude, violating the Petrobaltic platform's security zone. The jets flew at an altitude of just 150 meters over the facility, which is located about 70 kilometers north of Jastarnia in the Polish economic zone of the Baltic Sea.

These actions followed a wave of drone incidents in recent weeks. Just ten days earlier, around 20 Russian drones entered Polish airspace during a Russian airstrike on Ukraine. Poland and other NATO allies shot down some of these drones for the first time, marking a new escalation in Russian-Western tensions. Romania also reported similar incidents involving Russian drones in its airspace.

Suitable for:

• NATO on alert – Nighttime drone attack: Poland shoots down Russian drones for the first time after airspace violation

Strategic importance and expert analysis

Security experts interpret these incidents as a deliberate Russian strategy to test NATO's limits and responses. Military expert Fabian Hoffmann of the University of Oslo assessed the situation as extremely serious and warned that Russia continues to test its limits. NATO must react sooner or later, or the alliance will lose its credibility.

The provocations come at a strategically significant time. They are taking place in parallel with the Russian military exercise Sapad 2025, which translates as "West," and is clearly aimed at making an impression on NATO's eastern flank. Although Russia claims to have involved 100,000 troops in the exercise, British intelligence estimates the actual numbers are significantly lower.

The airspace violations serve several strategic purposes: They test NATO's response time and capabilities, demonstrate Russian presence in the Baltic Sea region, and are intended to sow uncertainty and division within the Western alliance. At the same time, Russia is gathering valuable intelligence on NATO defense systems and procedures.

Historical context of airspace violations

Airspace violations by Russia are not a new phenomenon, but have increased significantly since the beginning of the war in Ukraine. Estonia recorded four confirmed violations of its airspace by Russian aircraft in 2025. On May 13, a Sukhoi Su-35 entered Estonian airspace over the Juminda Peninsula, but remained there for less than a minute. Further incidents followed on June 22 and September 7, with the September incident involving a Russian Mi-8 helicopter.

This cluster of incidents demonstrates a systematic pattern of Russian provocations along NATO's entire eastern flank. Similar incidents have also occurred over other Baltic states and Poland in recent months. The international community is observing a worrying intensification of these activities, which are aimed at testing NATO solidarity and identifying potential vulnerabilities within the Alliance.

Technical aspects of airspace surveillance

The Baltic Air Policing Mission is one of NATO's most important operations on the Eastern Flank. Since the Baltic states do not have their own combat aircraft, various NATO member states rotate in this responsibility every four months. The mission operates from two main bases: Ämari Air Base in Estonia and Šiauliai Air Base in Lithuania.

The Italian F-35 jets currently conducting air surveillance represent cutting-edge fighter technology. This fifth-generation aircraft boasts advanced stealth capabilities, sophisticated sensors, and the ability to network with other NATO systems. Their presence sends a clear signal of the Alliance's technological superiority and resolve.

Political and economic reactions

In direct response to the increasing Russian provocations, the European Union announced a tightening of its sanctions. The EU Commission presented the 19th sanctions package, which, among other things, provides for an early ban on the import of Russian liquefied natural gas starting in January 2027. In addition, 118 additional vessels from the so-called Russian shadow fleet were added to the sanctions list, which is intended to further limit Russia's ability to circumvent existing sanctions.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy used the incident to call for a tougher international response to Russian aggression. He warned that Russia's destabilizing actions would spread to new countries if there were no decisive response. His Foreign Minister, Andriy Sybiha, spoke of a direct threat to transatlantic security and demanded a truly forceful response.

Military-strategic implications

Russian airspace violations have far-reaching military-strategic consequences for NATO and the regional security architecture. They require the Alliance to maintain a constant state of readiness and commit significant military resources to air defense. At the same time, they serve as a test run for potential military scenarios and allow Russia to study NATO's response times and patterns.

The incidents also underscore the strategic importance of the Baltic Sea region as a potential theater of conflict. The region combines important sea routes, critical infrastructure, and NATO's particularly exposed eastern flank. Russia's systematic provocations are aimed at testing the region's defense capabilities and potentially identifying vulnerabilities for future operations.

International legal situation and international law

Russia's airspace violations constitute clear violations of international aviation law and the sovereignty of the states concerned. The 1944 Chicago Convention, which forms the basis of international civil aviation law, establishes the principle of complete and exclusive sovereignty of states over their airspace. Military aircraft may only fly over foreign territories with express authorization.

Russia's systematic violation of these principles undermines the international legal order and sets dangerous precedents. The NATO states concerned have the right of self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter and can take legitimate measures to safeguard their sovereignty, including the use of combat aircraft to deter and escort intruding aircraft.

Future developments and forecasts

The increasing frequency of Russian provocations suggests a further escalation of tensions in the Baltic Sea region. Experts anticipate an intensification of NATO air defense and possibly stricter rules of engagement for dealing with airspace violations. The planned NATO Article 4 consultations could lead to increased defensive measures on the eastern flank, including an increase in air defense systems and an increased presence of combat aircraft.

At the same time, a vicious cycle of provocation and reaction threatens to increasingly destabilize the region. The international community faces the challenge of responding decisively to Russian aggression while avoiding an uncontrolled escalation that could lead to a larger conflict.

The coming weeks will show how successful the NATO consultations are and what concrete measures will be adopted to strengthen regional security. The solidarity of the Alliance and the unity of the international response will be decisive in determining whether Russia's strategy of provocation and destabilization can be successfully countered or whether it will lead to a permanent deterioration of the security situation in Europe.

Markus Becker

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

Head of Business Development

Chairman SME Connect Defense Working Group

LinkedIn

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

contact me under Wolfenstein ∂ Xpert.digital

call me under +49 89 674 804 (Munich)

LinkedIn