Can a SAP KI be Europe's answer? What the EU has to do in the global race for artificial intelligence

SAP and KI: Investment plans in the focus of the regulatory debate

The announcement of SAP to invest up to 40 billion euros in European AI projects, if the regulatory framework is optimized and fit, is a clear signal for the enormous potential of Europe in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). However, many companies are still hesitating, especially because of the strict regulations that are perceived as inhibitory. Compared to the USA and China, the EU faces the challenge of aligning its AI strategy in such a way that it presents both ethical standards and promotes investments and innovations.

This article analyzes the current hurdles, highlights international approaches and gives concrete recommendations for action on how the EU can strengthen its competitiveness in the global AI race.

The "Ai Act": Europe's answer to the challenges of AI

Europe has a strong research landscape and well-developed digital infrastructure, but the regulatory framework plays a crucial role in the future of AI development. The "AI Act" is the world's first comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence in the EU. His goal is to promote innovations without endangering the security and protection of citizens.

The "AI Act" divides AI systems into four risk categories:

• Minimal or no risk: these AI systems are not subject to any special regulations. These include video games or spam filters.
• Limited risk: AI systems in this category, such as chatbots, must be transparent so that users can recognize that they interact with AI.
• High risk: This includes applications in sensitive areas such as medicine, traffic or law enforcement. Strict requirements regarding safety, transparency and reliability apply here.
• Inacceptable risk: AI systems that are used for behavioral manipulation or social assessment are prohibited in the EU.

While the "AI Act" is an important step for responsible AI use, there is also criticism. Many companies fear that the strict regulations will slow down the progress and competitiveness of Europe compared to other markets.

Suitable for:

• Europe's AI future: How an EU AI can keep up in the global race for artificial intelligence

USA and China: The pioneers in AI development

Both the USA and China have developed ambitious AI strategies and invest massively in research and development. They follow different approaches:

USA: innovation drives and market -oriented

The United States is relying on a flexible, market economy approach to promote AI innovations. Instead of uniform federal legislation, there are various federal and state initiatives:

• The Colorado AI Act obliges companies to avoid algorithmic discrimination and to ensure transparency.
• The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) regulates the use of automated decision systems and gives consumers the right to object to the use of these systems.
• The US patent and trademark office has issued guidelines for patentability of AI-based inventions. These say that the human contribution must be clearly recognizable in order to be patentable.

This comparatively liberal approach enables companies to quickly launch new AI technologies. But there are also challenges: the lack of central regulation can lead to companies facing inconsistent requirements in various states.

China: centrally controlled with ambitious goals

China pursues a strongly state-controlled AI strategy with the aim of increasing the world's leading AI nation by 2030.

• The "preliminary measures for generative AI" determine strict rules for data protection, content control and ethical standards. AI generated content must be clearly marked.
• The Chinese government is investing massively in national AI infrastructures and promotes strategically relevant technologies.
• Developers and operators of AI systems are responsible for the content of their AI in China and must ensure that no socially or politically unwanted content is generated.

This strict control enables fast and coordinated development, but also places high demands on companies, especially in terms of censorship and political influence.

Recommendations for action for the EU

In order for Europe not to remain in the global AI competition, targeted measures are required:

1. Bureaucracy reduction and faster approval procedures: Companies should have fewer regulatory hurdles to bring AI innovations to the market faster.
2. Promotion of research and development: With increased investments in AI research, Europe can increase its competitiveness.
3. Adjustment of the "AI Act": A more flexible regulation that supports start-ups and SMEs would be crucial.
4. Expansion of the digital infrastructure: A powerful IT infrastructure is essential for AI development and applications.
5. Promotion of AI training: More training programs for AI specialists and attractive labor markets could alleviate the shortage of skilled workers.
6. International cooperation: closer cooperation with the USA and China could help to establish globally uniform AI standards.

Europe has the potential to play a leading role in the field of artificial intelligence. However, in order to be able to survive against the USA and China, the EU must optimize its framework conditions. A wisely balanced regulatory approach that does not inhibit innovations but promotes is crucial. The coming years will show whether Europe will adapt its AI strategy accordingly and establish itself as a strong player in the global AI competition.

From local to global: SMEs conquer the global market with clever strategies - Image: Xpert.Digital

At a time when a company's digital presence determines its success, the challenge is how to make this presence authentic, individual and far-reaching. Xpert.Digital offers an innovative solution that positions itself as an intersection between an industry hub, a blog and a brand ambassador. It combines the advantages of communication and sales channels in a single platform and enables publication in 18 different languages. The cooperation with partner portals and the possibility of publishing articles on Google News and a press distribution list with around 8,000 journalists and readers maximize the reach and visibility of the content. This represents an essential factor in external sales & marketing (SMarketing).

More about it here:

• Authentic. Individually. Global: The Xpert.Digital strategy for your company

The "Ai Act": a regulatory milestone and its challenges

Europe is a haven of talent and ideas in the field of AI research and development. In order to fully exploit this potential, however, the EU has to cultivate an environment that inspires investments and innovations. A crucial step in this direction is the "AI Act", the first comprehensive legal work for artificial intelligence in the EU. The primary goal of this law is to promote the development and use of AI and at the same time ensure that these systems are safe, trustworthy and ethical. A balance is to be found between the protection of citizens and the promotion of technological progress.

The "AI Act" follows a risk -based approach. It categorizes AI systems according to their potential risk and determines corresponding requirements:

Risk category Description Requirements Examples

• Minimal or no risk of AI systems that pose no or just a minimal risk for users. No specific requirements. Video games, spam filter, simple recommendation systems
• Limited risk of AI systems that have a limited risk of security or fundamental rights of users. Transparency requirements: Users must be informed that they interact with a AI system. Disclosure of the functioning of the algorithms. Chatbots, AI-based text generators, simple image editing software
• High risk of AI systems that are used in sensitive areas and recover a high risk of the security or fundamental rights of the users. Strict requirements for security, reliability, transparency and traceability of the AI ​​systems. Monitoring the systems throughout their life cycle. AI systems in medicine (diagnosis, treatment), in traffic (autonomous driving), law enforcement (facial recognition), in education (automatic evaluation)
• Unacceptable risk of AI systems that represent an unacceptable risk of the security or fundamental rights of the users. Forbidden in the EU. Systems for manipulating human behavior (e.g. subliminal advertising), systems for social evaluation (social scoring)

The "AI Act" is a crucial step to promote responsible AI development and to protect citizens from the potential risks of this technology. However, there is also criticism. Some voices warn that the strict regulation inhibit innovations and that in Europe could endanger Europe's competitiveness in the global AI race. It is a balancing act between the protection of civil rights and the promotion of technological progress.

Global AI locations: USA and China in comparison

While Europe is trying to create a consistent regulatory framework, the USA and China pursue different, but equally ambitious strategies in the field of AI. Both countries have already taken concrete measures to promote the development and application of AI. The United States relies on a market -oriented approach, while China pursues a more centralized strategy.

USA: a mosaic of innovation and competition

In the United States there is no uniform federal law to regulate AI. The US government has opted for a more flexible approach to promote innovations and competition. This approach is based on the assumption that the competition is the best driver for technological progress. However, the individual states have increasingly started initiatives to regulate AI.

Some states, such as Colorado, have enacted laws that put the transparency and protection against discrimination against AI systems. The "Colorado Ai Act", for example, obliges developers and operators of high-risk AI systems to prevent algorithmic discrimination and to report discrimination against the Attorney General. With the "California Consumer Privacy Act" (CCPA), California has also created regulations for the use of automated decision systems and granted consumers the right to contradict the use of such technologies by companies.

In addition to the regulatory efforts at the state level, the US Patent and Trademark Office has published a guideline for inventions that are supported by artificial intelligence. This guideline states that AI-supported inventions are not generally not patentable, but an essential contribution from the human inventor must be recognizable, since patents serve to reward human creativity.

This mixture of federal regulation and an overall more flexible approach at federal level enables the United States to promote innovations and at the same time react to concerns about the ethical use of AI.

China: centralized control and national ambitions

China follows another model. The country has set itself the goal of being the world in the area of ​​AI until 2030 and massively investing in building a national AI infrastructure. The Chinese government promotes the development and application of AI in all economic sectors and social areas. This strategic orientation is anchored in national development plans.

China has already issued a number of laws and guidelines to regulate AI development. The "preliminary measures for the management of generative artificial intelligence" set strict rules for data protection, content control and the ethical use of AI. A central aspect is the labeling obligation for AI-generated content, for example through watermark. In addition, content is prohibited that could be considered harmful, misleading or annoying for the social order. This also includes politically sensitive topics.

The Chinese regulations attach great importance to avoiding bias in AI algorithms and ensure that AI generated content does not discriminate on any individuals or groups. AI developers and operators are responsible for the results of their systems in China and must ensure that they do not produce any harmful or illegal content. They are also obliged to protect rights to intellectual property and business ethics.

China's regulatory approach is an example of a centralized control of AI development with the aim of promoting a responsible and ethical AI ecosystem and strengthening the trust of the public in AI technologies. This strategy could also be a precedent for global AI government.

Comparative analysis: EU, USA and China in the race for AI

The various EU, the USA and China in the field of AI regulation reflect their different priorities and economic models. While the EU has created a comprehensive legal framework with the "AI Act" that focuses on risk minimization and ethical standards, the United States is relying on a more flexible and more market -oriented strategy with regulations at state level. China pursues a centralized approach with strict regulations that aim to promote AI development and application under state control.

A major difference is the degree of regulation. With the "AI Act", the EU is pursuing a comparatively strict approach that could inhibit innovations. The United States rely on deregulation and competition as a means of promoting innovation. China combines state control with targeted promotion of innovation. The ethical aspects of AI development are weighted differently. The EU attaches great importance to protecting fundamental rights and avoiding discrimination. In the United States, ethical questions are increasingly being treated at the state level. China emphasizes compliance with "public order and morality" and avoiding bias in AI algorithms.

Suitable for:

• Deepseek and Stargate competitor from Europe? SAP is planning European AI offensive with 40 billion euros-with reservation
• Aleph Alpha is doing it right: Out of the Red Ocean of artificial intelligence and into the Blue Ocean of specialization and unique selling points

Recommendations for action for the EU: Pave the way to the Ki top

In order to keep up in the global AI race, the EU must adapt its framework conditions and create an environment that favors investments and innovations. The following recommendations for action can help pave this way:

Bureaucratic reduction and accelerated approval process

The EU should reduce bureaucratic hurdles and accelerate approval procedures for AI projects. This would encourage companies to invest in AI and to launch innovative products and services faster. A slimmer set of rules can increase the competitiveness of European companies.

Promoting research and development

The EU should promote research and development in the field of AI. This could be done through targeted support programs, the expansion of research infrastructures and the support of cooperation between science and business. An ecosystem should be created that promotes knowledge exchange and cooperation.

Adaptation of the "Ai Act"

The "AI Act" should be adjusted in such a way that it does not hinder innovations, but promotes. The specific needs of start-ups and small and medium-sized companies (SMEs) should be taken into account. A comparison with the Britain's approach, which deliberately does not establish a new regulatory authority in order not to hinder innovations, can provide valuable knowledge. It is important that regulation is flexible and can adapt to the rapid developments in the AI ​​area.

Strengthening the digital infrastructure

The EU should advance the expansion of the digital infrastructure to support the development and application of AI. This includes the expansion of high-speed networks, the promotion of cloud computing and the provision of data infrastructures. A robust and reliable digital infrastructure is the basis for successful AI development.

Initial and continuing education

The EU should invest in the training and further education of AI specialists. This includes promoting AI courses, supporting further training measures and creating incentives for the training of AI talents. It is important that Europe has enough specialists to promote AI development.

Ethical guidelines and standards

The EU should drive the development of ethical guidelines and standards for AI development and application. This would help to use AI systems responsibly and in accordance with European values. Compliance with ethical standards is crucial for the trust of the public in AI technologies.

International cooperation

The EU should promote international cooperation in the field of AI and to harmonize AI standards at a global level. The different regulatory approaches of the EU, the USA and China should be taken into account and synergies are used. Global cooperation is important to create a uniform and transparent set of rules for AI.

Promotion of "Ki Made in Europe"

The EU should create targeted funding programs that benefit from European AI companies in particular. This can be done in the form of direct grants, risk capital or tax incentives. The promotion of European AI champions is crucial for strengthening the European AI landscape.

Data sovereignty

The EU must strengthen control over the data of its citizens. This means that European data should be saved and processed in Europe and that European companies have the opportunity to access this data. The protection of data and the protection of data sovereignty are decisive factors for the digital independence of the EU.

Public awareness

The EU should promote a public debate about the opportunities and risks of AI. It is important that citizens are informed about the effects of the AI ​​and can participate in the design of the future of this technology. A comprehensive education of the public can help to reduce fears and create acceptance for AI.

Europe's strategic course for AI future

The EU has the potential to play a leading role in the global AI race. In order to implement this potential, however, it must create the right framework. Through targeted promotion of research and development, flexible regulation, strengthening the digital infrastructure and investing in education, the EU can create an attractive environment for AI investments and innovations.

The different approaches of the EU, the USA and China in the field of AI regulation illustrate the challenges of global AI government. The EU should learn from the experiences of other countries and continuously develop its own approach in order to promote innovations and at the same time maintain ethical standards. It is of crucial importance that the EU is now acting to actively secure its competitiveness in the global AI race and actively shape the future of artificial intelligence in Europe. The European Union is on the crossroads to play a crucial role in the design of the AI ​​future and thus to secure its position in the global economy. The path is demanding, but with clear goals and determined action, the EU can become a pioneer in AI development.

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form below or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) .

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

Xpert.Digital is a hub for industry with a focus on digitalization, mechanical engineering, logistics/intralogistics and photovoltaics.

With our 360° business development solution, we support well-known companies from new business to after sales.

Market intelligence, smarketing, marketing automation, content development, PR, mail campaigns, personalized social media and lead nurturing are part of our digital tools.

You can find out more at: www.xpert.digital - www.xpert.solar - www.xpert.plus