Quick thinking vs. Blitz thinking - Google vs. Tencent - Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs. Hunyuan Turbo S - in the race for intuitive artificial intelligence

The future of AI intelligence: fast thinking as a new standard?

In the global arena of artificial intelligence (AI), a remarkable new chapter unfolds: Both the technologie Google and the Chinese internet giant Tencent invest massively in the development of AI models, which are characterized by extraordinary speed and intuition. These models are designed to provide decisions and answers in a fraction of the time that require conventional, more AI systems geared towards deliberative processes. This development marks a significant paradigm shift in AI research and development, which could have profound effects in the way we interact with technology and how AI will be integrated into our lives in the future.

The inspiration for this new approach comes from cognitive psychology and in particular from the work of the Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman. His groundbreaking theory of “fast and slow thinking” has revolutionized the basis for the understanding of human decision-making processes and now serves as a blueprint for the next generation of AI systems. While Google and Tencent are both inspired by these concepts, they pursue different strategies and technical implementations to realize “quick thinking” in AI. This report illuminates the fascinating similarities and differences between Google's “lightning thinking” with Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Tencents “quick-thinking” approach with Hunyuan Turbo S. We will examine the underlying principles, the technical architectures, the strategic goals and the potential implications of these innovative AI models, a comprehensive image of the future of the intuitive artificial To draw intelligence.

The cognitive psychological basis: the dual system of thinking

The foundation for the development of intuitive AI systems, as already mentioned, is Daniel Kahneman's pioneering work "quick thinking, slow thinking". In this book, Kahneman designs a convincing model of the human mind that is based on the distinction between two fundamental thinking systems: System 1 and System 2.

System 1, the “quick thinking”, operates automatically, unconsciously and with minimal effort. It is responsible for intuitive, emotional and stereotypical reactions. This system enables us to make decisions at lightning speed and react to stimuli in our area without consciously thinking about it. Think of the immediate recognition of an angry facial expression or the automatic dodging before an obstacle that suddenly appears - System 1 is at work here. It is resource -efficient and enables us to survive in complex and fast -moving environments.

System 2, the “slow thinking”, on the other hand, is aware of it, analytically and requires effort. It is responsible for logical thinking, complex problem solving and the critical questioning of the intuitive impulses of System 1. System 2 becomes active when we have to focus on difficult tasks, such as solving a mathematical problem, writing a report or weighing up different options in the event of an important decision. It is more slower and more energy -intensive than System 1, but enables us to penetrate complex facts and to fake well -founded judgments.

Kahneman's theory says that most of our life is dominated by System 1. It is estimated that around 90 to 95 percent of our daily decisions are based on intuitive, fast processing. This is not necessarily a disadvantage. On the contrary: System 1 is extremely efficient in many everyday situations and enables us to keep pace with the flood of information around us. It enables us to recognize patterns, to make predictions and to act quickly without being overwhelmed by endless analyzes.

However, System 1 is also susceptible to errors and distortions. Since it is based on heuristics and rule of thumb, it can lead to rapid and false conclusions in complex or unusual situations. The already mentioned example of the racket and ball illustrates this perfectly. The intuitive answer of 10 cents for the ball is wrong, since System 1 makes a simple but incorrect calculation. The correct solution of 5 cents requires the intervention of System 2, which concerns the task analytically and takes a closer look at the mathematical relationship between the racket and ball.

The knowledge from Kahneman's work has significantly influenced AI research and inspired the development of models that reflect both the strengths and the limits of human thinking. Google and Tencent are two of the leading companies that face this challenge and try to develop AI systems that are both quickly and intuitively and reliably and understandable.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: Google's focus on transparency and comprehensibility

With Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental, Google has presented a AI model that is characterized by a remarkable approach: it is trained to disclose its own thinking process. This expansion of the Gemini model family introduced in early 2025 aims not only to solve complex problems, but also to make the path transparent and understandable. In essence, Google is about opening the “Black Box” of many AI systems and to give users an insight into the internal considerations and decisions of the AI.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking not only generates answers, but also presents the train of thought that led to this answer. It makes the internal processing process visible by lagging the individual steps, evaluating alternative solutions, making assumptions explicitly and represents its argument in a structured and understandable form. Google itself describes the model as capable of “stronger argumentation skills” compared to the basic model Gemini 2.0 Flash. This transparency is crucial to strengthen the trust of users in AI systems and to promote acceptance in critical areas of application. If users can understand the thinking process of a AI, they can better assess the quality of the answers, recognize potential mistakes in the thinking process and better understand the AI ​​decisions as a whole.

Another important aspect of Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is its multimodality. The model is able to process both text and images as input. This ability predestines it for complex tasks that require both linguistic and visual information, such as the analysis of diagrams, infographics or multimedia content. Although it accepts multimodal entries, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking currently generates only text -based editions, which underlines the focus on the verbal presentation of the thinking process. With an impressive context window of one million tokens, the model can process very long texts and extensive conversations. This ability is particularly valuable for deep analyzes, complex problem -solving tasks and scenarios in which the context plays a crucial role.

In terms of performance, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking achieved impressive results in various benchmarks. According to Google published by Google, the model shows significant improvements in mathematical and scientific tasks that typically require analytical and logical thinking. For example, in the demanding mathematics test AIME2024 it achieved a success rate of 73.3%, compared to 35.5% in the standard model Gemini 2.0 Flash. A significant increase in performance from 58.6% to 74.2% could also be recorded in scientific tasks (GPQA Diamond). In the case of multimodal argumentation tasks (MMMU), the success rate improved from 70.7% to 75.4%. These results indicate that Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is able to solve complex problems more effectively and to develop more convincing arguments than previous models.

Google positions Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking clearly in response to competing Reasoning models such as Deepseek's R-Series and Openais O series, which also aim to improve argumentative skills. The broad availability of the model via Google Ai Studio, the Gemini Api, Vertex AI and the Gemini app underlines Google's commitment to make this innovative technology accessible to a broad audience of developers, researchers and end users.

Suitable for:

• Flash thinking with artificial intelligence – This is what Google calls its latest AI model: Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental

Hunyuan Turbo S: Tencent's focus on speed and immediate responsiveness

While Google focuses on transparency and traceability with Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, Tencent with its latest AI model Hunyuan Turbo s follows a complementary but fundamentally different approach. Hunyuan Turbo S, which was presented at the end of February 2025, prioritize speed and direct answers. The model is designed to react immediately without recognizable “thinking” and to provide users lightning -fast answers. Tencent's vision is a AI that feels as natural and reaction quickly as a human interlocutor.

Tencent refers to this approach as a “quick thinker” or “intuitive AI” and deliberately distinguishes it from “slowly thinking” models such as Deepseek R1, which go through a complex internal thinking process before the answer generation. Hunyuan Turbo S is able to answer inquiries in less than a second, which doubles the output speed compared to previous Hunyuan models and the latency was reduced by an impressive 44% until the first word output. This increase in speed is not only an advantage for the user experience, but also for applications in which real-time reactions are crucial, such as in customer service chatbots or interactive voice assistants.

Hunyuan Turbo S's remarkable speed increase is made possible by an innovative hybrid mamba transformer architecture. This architecture combines the strengths of the traditional transformer models with the efficiency advantages of the Mamba architecture. Transformer models, which form the backbone of most modern large Language models (LLMS), are extremely powerful, but also compensation-intensive and memory hungry. The Mamba architecture, on the other hand, is known for its efficiency in the processing of long sequences and significantly reduces compensation complexity. Through the hybridization of both architectures, Hunyuan Turbo S can maintain the ability of transformers to record complex contexts and at the same time benefit from the efficiency and speed of the Mamba architecture. Tencent emphasizes that it is the first successful industrial application of the Mamba architecture in ultra-boss MOE models (Mixture of Experts) without having to accept loss of performance. MOE models are particularly complex and powerful because they consist of several “experts” models that are activated depending on the request.

Despite the prioritization of speed, Tencent emphasizes that Hunyuan Turbo S can compete in various benchmarks with leading models such as Deepseek V3, GPT-4O and Claude. In internal tests carried out by Tencent against these competitors in areas such as knowledge, argument, mathematics and programming, Hunyuan Turbo S is said to have been the fastest model in 10 out of 17 tested subcategories. This claim underlines that Tencent aims not only at speed, but also to a high level of performance.

Another strategic advantage of Hunyuan Turbo S is his aggressive pricing. Tencent offers the model at a very competitive price of 0.8 yuan per million tokens for input and 2 yuan per million tokens for the output. This represents a significant reduction in price compared to previous Hunyuan models and many competitive offers. This aggressive price strategy aims to make KI technology accessible to a wide range of users, especially in China, and the usage threshold for AI applications in various industries and areas. It is a clear attempt by Tencent to accelerate the mass acceptance of AI technology.

Suitable for:

• AI model Hunyuan Turbo S from Tencent (Wechat/Weixin): “Intuitive AI”-new milestone in the global AI race

Technical comparison: divergent architectures for similar goals

The technical differences between Google and Tencent approaches are fundamental and reflect their different philosophies and priorities. While both companies pursue the goal of implementing “quick thinking” in AI, they choose fundamentally different architectural paths.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking from Google is based on the established transformer architecture, which, as already mentioned, forms the backbone of most current Large Language Models (LLMS). However, Google has modified and expanded this basic structure in order to generate and present not only the end results, but also the thinking process itself. This requires sophisticated training methods in which the model learns to externalize its internal considerations and to present them in a form that is understandable for humans. The exact details of these training methods are proprietary, but it can be assumed that Google uses techniques such as Reinforcement Learning and special architectural extensions to promote the transparency of the thinking process.

With Hunyuan Turbo S, Tencent, on the other hand, relies on a hybrid architecture that combines mamba elements with transformer components. The Mamba architecture, which is relatively new in AI research, is characterized by its efficiency in the processing of long sequences and its low compensation. In contrast to transformers that are based on attention mechanisms that scalate square with the sequence length, Mamba uses a selective state space modeling that scalates linearly with the sequence length. This makes Mamba particularly efficient for processing very long texts or time series. Through the combination with transformer components, Hunyuan Turbo S retains the strengths of transformers when recording complex contexts and semantic relationships, while it also benefits from the speed and efficiency of the Mamba architecture. This hybridization is a clever move by Tencent to overcome the limits of pure transformer architecture and to develop a model that is both quick and efficient.

These different architectural approaches lead to different strengths and weaknesses of the two models:

1. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Offers the clear advantage of greater transparency and traceability of the thinking process. Users can understand how the AI ​​has reached their answers, which can promote trust and acceptance. However, the generation and presentation of the thinking process may need more arithmetic resources, which can potentially affect the reply speed and costs.

2. Hunyuan Turbo S

Shines through exceptional speed and efficiency. The hybrid mamba transformer architecture enables lightning-fast answers and lower resource consumption. The disadvantage is that the explicit representation of the way of thinking is missing, which can limit the traceability of the decisions. However, Hunyuan Turbo S may be the more attractive option for applications in which speed and costs are decisive.

The technical difference between the two models also reflects different market positioning and strategic focus. With its transparent approach, Google emphasizes the trustworthiness, explanation and pedagogical applicability of the AI. With its efficient and fast model, Tencent, on the other hand, puts practical applicability, cost efficiency and mass suitability.

Strategic implications: the global race for AI dominance and the reaction to Deepseek

The development of fast, intuitive AI models by Google and Tencent is not to be seen in isolation, but as part of a more comprehensive geopolitical and economic competition for dominance in the field of artificial intelligence. Both companies react to the growing success and the innovative strength of new actors such as Deepseek, who have caused a stir with their high-performance and efficient models in the AI ​​community.

Google, as an established technology and pioneer in the area of ​​AI, is faced with the challenge of defending its leading position in a fast -developing field. Tencent, as a Chinese company with global ambitions, strives for international recognition and market shares in the AI ​​sector. The different approaches of Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Hunyuan Turbo S also reflect the different market conditions, regulatory environments and user expectations in the respective core markets - the USA and the west for Google, and China and Asia for Tencent.

Hunyuan Turbo S is introduced in a context of intensive competition among Chinese technology companies in the AI ​​area. The remarkable success of Deepseek's models, in particular the R1 model, which caused a sensation worldwide in January 2025, has noticeably increased competitive pressure on larger competitors in China. Deepseek, a relatively young company with comparatively lower resources as Tencent, had achieved performance that is equal to western competing models such as GPT-4 or Claude or even exceeds them in certain areas. This has caused Tencent and other Chinese tech giants to intensify their AI development efforts and to launch new, innovative models.

Google's reaction with Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can also be seen as a strategic move in order to maintain the lead in the western market and at the same time react to the growing competition from China and other regions. The broad availability of Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking via various Google platforms and services as well as deep integration with existing Google services such as YouTube, Search and Maps underline Google's striving to establish a comprehensive and user-friendly AI ecosystem that is attractive for both developers and for end users.

Tencent and Google's different price strategies are also characteristic of their respective strategic goals. Tencents aggressive pricing policy with Hunyuan Turbo S aims to drastically lower the entry hurdle for AI use and to promote broad adoption in various industries and with a large number of users. In contrast, Google pursues a more differentiated access model with various options, including free usage contingents via Google AI Studio for developers and researchers as well as paid options via Gemini API and Vertex AI for commercial applications. This differentiated price structure enables Google to address various market segments and at the same time generate income from commercial applications.

The coexistence of fast and slow thinking models: a multi-layered AI ecosystem

An important and often overlooked aspect of current development in the field of AI is that neither Google nor Tencent rely on “quick thinking”. Both companies recognize the importance of a multi-layered AI ecosystem and develop in parallel models that are optimized for profound, analytical thinking and more complex tasks.

In addition to Hunyuan Turbo S, Tencent has also developed the inference model T1 with profound thinking skills that was integrated into the AI ​​search engine Tencent Yuanbao. In Yuanbao, users even have the option of explicitly choosing whether they want to use the faster Deepseek R1 model or the more profound Tencent Hunyuan T1 model for their inquiries. This choice underlines Tencent's understanding that different tasks require different thinking processes and AI models.

In addition to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, Google also offers other variants of the Gemini model family, such as Gemini 2.0 Pro, which are optimized for more complex tasks in which precision and profound analysis are more important than pure reply speed. This diversification of the model offer shows that both Google and Tencent recognize the need to offer a range of AI models that meet different requirements and applications.

The coexistence of fast and slow thinking models in AI development reflects the basic knowledge that both approaches have their justification and strengths-just like in human brain. In his work, Daniel Kahneman himself emphasizes that people need both systems to work effectively in the world. System 1 processes huge amounts of information in a matter of seconds and enables fast, intuitive reactions, while system solves 2 complex problems, critically questioned and checked and corrected the frequently rapid suggestions from System 1.

This knowledge leads to a more nuanced understanding of AI systems, which goes beyond the simplified dichotomy of “fast versus slowly”. The actual challenge and the key to success in future AI development is to use the right models for the right tasks and ideally even to switch between different models or thinking modes-similar to the human brain, depending on the context and task, switches flexibly between system 1 and system 2.

Practical applications: When is quick thinking in the AI ​​advantageous?

The different strengths of rapid thinking and slowly thinking AI models suggest that they are optimized for different applications and scenarios. Fast -thinking models such as Tencents Hunyuan Turbo S are particularly suitable for applications in which speed, efficiency and immediate reaction are of crucial importance:

1. Customer service applications

In chatbots and virtual assistants in customer service, quick response times are decisive for a positive user experience and customer satisfaction. Hunyuan Turbo S can offer a significant advantage here thanks to its lightning -fast answers.

2. Real-time chatbots and interactive systems

The low latency of Hunyuan Turbo S is ideal for chatbots that have to interact with users in real time, or for interactive voice assistants who are supposed to react to voice commands immediately.

3. Mobile applications with limited resources

In mobile applications that run on smartphones or other devices with limited computing power and battery capacity, the efficiency of Hunyuan Turbo S is an advantage because it consumes fewer resources and protects the battery life.

4. Assistance systems for time -critical decisions

In certain situations, such as in emergency medicine or financial trade, quick decisions and reactions are of crucial importance. Fast-thinking AI models can provide valuable support here by analyzing information in real time and giving recommendations for action.

5. Mass data processing and real -time analysis

For the processing of large amounts of data or the real -time analysis of data streams, such as on social media or on the Internet of Things (IoT), the efficiency of Hunyuan Turbo S is an advantage because it can quickly process and analyze large amounts of data.

In contrast, transparent models such as Google's Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking are particularly advantageous in situations in which traceability, trust, explanability and pedagogical aspects are in the foreground:

1. Educational applications

In learning platforms and e-learning systems, the transparency of Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can help support and improve learning processes. By disclosing your train of thought, learners can better understand how the AI ​​has its answers or solutions and learn from it.

2. Scientific analyzes and research

In scientific research and analysis, traceability and reproducibility of results is of crucial importance. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can be used in these areas to make scientific conclusions understandable and to support the research process.

3. Medical diagnostic support and healthcare

In medical diagnostic support or in the development of AI-based health systems, transparency and traceability of decisions is essential in order to gain the trust of doctors and patients. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can help here to document and explain the decision -making way of AI in medical diagnostics or therapy recommendation.

4. Financial analyzes and risk management

In the financial industry, especially with complex financial analyzes or in risk management, the traceability of recommendations and decisions is of great importance. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can be used in these areas to provide verifiable and comprehensible analyzes and recommendations.

5. Legal applications and compliance

In legal applications, such as the contract examination or compliance monitoring, transparency and traceability of decision-making is of crucial importance in order to meet legal requirements and to ensure responsibility. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can help here to make the decision -making process of the AI ​​transparent in legal contexts.

The practical implementation of these models is already evident in the integration strategies of both companies. Google has embedded Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking in its diverse platforms and services and enables use via Google Ai Studio, Gemini API, Vertex AI and the Gemini app. Tencent gradually integrates Hunyuan Turbo S into its existing products and services, starting with Tencent Yuanbao, where users can already choose between different models.

It is also remarkable to Tencent's parallel integration of the Deepseek-R1 model into its Weixin app (the Chinese version of Wechat) since mid-February 2025. This strategic partnership enables tencent to provide its users in China access to another high-performance AI model and at the same time actively shape the competitive landscape in the Chinese AI market. The integration of deepseek-r1 in Weixin is via a new “AI search” option in the search bar of the app, but is currently limited to the Chinese Weixin app and is not yet available in the international Wechat version.

The future of quick thinking in artificial intelligence and the convergence of the approaches

The development of rapidly thinking AI models by Google and Tencent marks an important milestone in the evolution of artificial intelligence. These models are increasingly approaching human intuition and have the potential to be integrated even more powerful, versatile and more into our everyday life in the future.

Neurophysiological research has already given interesting insights into the limits of information processing in the human brain. Scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Cognitive and Neurosciences in Leipzig, for example, discovered a “speed limit of thoughts”-a maximum speed for information processing that depends on the density of the neural interconnections in the brain. This research indicates that artificial neuronal networks could theoretically similar restrictions, depending on their architecture and complexity. Future progress in AI research could therefore concentrate on overcoming these potential restrictions and developing even more efficient and faster architectures.

Several exciting trends are foreseeable for the future of AI development, which could continue to advance the evolution of “quick thinking”:

1. Integration of fast and slow thinking in hybrid models

The next generation of AI systems could increasingly have hybrid architectures that integrate both elements of fast and slow thinking. Such models could switch between different thinking modes, depending on the type of task, the context and the user needs.

2. Improved self -monitoring and metacognition

Future, fast -thinking models could be equipped with improved self -monitoring mechanisms and metacognitive skills. This would enable you to recognize independently when your intuitive answers may be incorrect or insufficient, and then automatically switch to slower, analytical thinking in order to check and correct your results.

3. Personalization of the memorial pace and the styles of thinking

In the future, AI systems could be able to adapt their memorial pace and their style of thinking to individual user preferences, tasks and contexts. This could mean that users are able to determine preferences for speed versus thoroughness or that the AI ​​automatically selects the optimal mode of thought based on the type of request and the previous user behavior.

4. Optimization of energy efficiency for EDGE computing and mobile applications

With the increasing spread of AI in mobile devices and EDGE computing scenarios, the energy efficiency of AI models is becoming increasingly important. Future, fast -thinking models will probably rely on energy -efficient architectures and algorithms to minimize energy consumption and enable use to use resource -limited devices. This could pave the way for more ubiquitous and personalized AI applications.

5. Development of improved metrics to evaluate intuitive AI

The evaluation of the quality of intuitive AI answers is a special challenge. Traditional metrics that focus on precision and correctness may fall short of intuitive answers. Future research will have to deal with the development of better metrics that also take aspects such as creativity, originality, relevance and user satisfaction into account when evaluating intuitive AI answers. This is crucial to make progress measuring in this area and to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches.

The way to hybrid AI approaches: speed meets trustworthiness

The different approaches from Google and Tencent - transparency versus speed - will probably not mutually exclude each other in the future, but rather converge. Both companies will learn from each other, develop their models further and possibly pursue hybrid approaches that combine the advantages of both worlds. The next generation of AI systems could ideally be both quick and transparent, similar to people are able to subsequently reflect, explain and justify their intuitive decisions. This convergence could lead to AI systems that are not only efficient and reaction quickly, but also trustworthy, understandable and able to solve complex problems in one way that imitates human thinking better and better.

Complementary innovations in the global AI competition and the way to hybrid thinking models

The intensive competition between Google and Tencent in the area of ​​fast thinking and lightning thinks impressively illustrates the variety of innovation paths that take a Ki developer worldwide in order to reproduce human-like thinking processes in artificial systems. While Google with Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking places a clear focus on transparency, traceability and explanability and wants to make the thinking process of the AI ​​visible, Tencent prioritizes with Hunyuan Turbo's speed, efficiency and immediate reaction to create a AI that feels as natural and intuitive as possible.

It is important to emphasize that these different approaches should not be considered opposite or competing, but rather as complementary and in addition. They reflect the duality of human thinking in a fascinating way - our unique ability to think quickly, intuitively and unconsciously as well as slowly, analytically and consciously, depending on the context, task and situation. The actual challenge for AI developers now is to design and develop systems that can imitate this remarkable flexibility and adaptability of the human mind and translate into artificial intelligence.

The global competition between technologies such as Google and Tencent, but also with aspiring and innovative companies such as Deepseek, drives innovation in the field of artificial intelligence unexpectedly and accelerates technological progress at a rapid pace. Both companies react to the growing success of newcomers, recognize the changing requirements of the market and try to establish their own unique, unique approaches and strengths in the global AI ecosystem.

Ultimately, users and society as a whole benefit from this variety of research approaches, development strategies and technological innovations. We have access to an ever wider range of AI models and applications, from fast, efficient and cost -effective models for everyday tasks and mass applications to transparent, comprehensible and explainable systems for more complex problems, critical decisions and sensitive areas of application. The coexistence of these different AI paradigms-exemplarily represents divergent but ultimately complementary approaches-enriches the entire AI ecosystem and extends the possibilities for future applications in almost all areas of life.

With a view to the future, there is a lot of indication that we will experience increasing convergence and hybridization of these different approaches. The next generation of AI systems will probably try to combine the strengths of fast and slow thinking and integrate into hybrid architectures. This could lead to increasingly efficient, more flexible and human-like AI systems that are not only able to solve complex problems and make intelligent decisions transparent, to explain their results and to interact with us in a way that is intuitive, natural and trustworthy. The future of artificial intelligence is therefore not in the simple choice between fast or slow thinking, but in the harmonious integration and intelligent balance of both ways of thinking - just as in the complex and fascinating human brain.

AI & XR 3D Rendering Machine: Fivefold expertise from Xpert.Digital in a comprehensive service package, R&D XR, PR & SEM - Image: Xpert.Digital

Xpert.Digital has in-depth knowledge of various industries. This allows us to develop tailor-made strategies that are tailored precisely to the requirements and challenges of your specific market segment. By continually analyzing market trends and following industry developments, we can act with foresight and offer innovative solutions. Through the combination of experience and knowledge, we generate added value and give our customers a decisive competitive advantage.

More about it here:

• Use the 5x expertise of Xpert.Digital in one package - starting at just €500/month

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form below or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) .

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

Xpert.Digital is a hub for industry with a focus on digitalization, mechanical engineering, logistics/intralogistics and photovoltaics.

With our 360° business development solution, we support well-known companies from new business to after sales.

Market intelligence, smarketing, marketing automation, content development, PR, mail campaigns, personalized social media and lead nurturing are part of our digital tools.

You can find out more at: www.xpert.digital - www.xpert.solar - www.xpert.plus