Meta does it like X: 'Community Notes' replace the 'fact check' - but there's a catch

Meta Introduces Community Notes – A New Era of Restricted Content Moderation

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, plans to launch a new content moderation system called Community Notes. This feature, which is strongly reminiscent of the model already implemented on Elon Musk's Platform X (formerly Twitter), is intended to involve users more in content moderation and combat the spread of misinformation. But there is a crucial catch: the “Community Notes” will only apply to organic content – ​​paid ads are excluded.

The most important innovations and restrictions

1. Scope: The “Community Notes” only apply to organic contributions, i.e. content for the distribution of which Meta does not use advertising budgets. Paid ads are explicitly excluded from the function.
2. Timing: The rollout will be gradual, starting in the US. The full implementation will be spread over several months and is expected to be further optimized throughout 2025.
3. Platforms: The three major meta platforms are affected: Facebook, Instagram and Threads.

This model marks a turning point in how Meta approaches content moderation. While the focus so far has been on a central fact-checking program, Meta's “Community Notes” aims to transfer responsibility for the accuracy of information to the community.

How do the “Community Notes” work?

The “Community Notes” system is based on the active participation of users and promotes decentralized moderation. The goal is to debunk or supplement misinformation through annotations and additional context.

Basic principle

• Users can add short comments to posts that they find misleading or need context.
• These comments are rated by other community members and only published if they are deemed “helpful.”

participation

• Any user who meets certain criteria (e.g. a minimum account age and no rule violations) can register as a contributor.
• Comments must be precise and well documented. They may be a maximum of 280 characters long and should be based on reliable sources.

Evaluation and publication

• Other contributors review the comments and rate them as “helpful” or “unhelpful.”
• A special algorithm ensures that only comments supported by users with different perspectives are published.
• This is intended to achieve the broadest possible consensus.

Why does Meta rely on “Community Notes”?

Meta has several goals with this initiative:

1. Promoting free expression: Returning to the “roots of free expression” is the focus. Instead of conducting centralized fact-checking, Meta wants to distribute responsibility among users.
2. Combating misinformation: By giving users the opportunity to flag and comment on misleading posts, misinformation should be identified more effectively and quickly.
3. Increasing transparency: By involving the community, the moderation process is made more transparent. The anonymity of the contributors is also intended to minimize possible bias.
4. Alternative to previous programs: Meta is replacing its central fact-checking program in the USA with “Community Notes”. This represents a significant shift in strategic direction.

Criticism and challenges

Although the introduction of “Community Notes” is considered an innovative step, there are also criticisms and potential problems:

Limitations on application

• Paid advertisements, which often have a large influence on public opinion, are excluded from the function. Critics see this as a vulnerability because misinformation in ads could remain unfiltered.
• It remains unclear how organic posts from brands, influencers or political actors should be treated.

Risk of manipulation

• Since moderation depends on the community, there is a risk that well-organized groups will exploit the system to specifically influence content.

Quality and objectivity

• Not all users have the necessary media literacy to objectively evaluate information.
• There is a risk that personal biases influence contributors' decisions.

Complexity of consensus building

• The algorithmic approach to consensus building could result in important comments not being published if they do not receive sufficient support.

Advantages of “Community Notes” over classic fact checks

Despite the challenges, the new system offers some notable benefits:

1. Decentralization and diversity

• Involving numerous users ensures a greater variety of perspectives.
• This reduces the risk of bias that can occur with centralized fact-checking organizations.

2. Faster response times

• Community Notes can be created in real time, allowing for faster response to new trends or viral misinformation.

3. Promoting media literacy

• Users are encouraged to actively research and critically question sources themselves.

4. Transparency and trust

• Since the process is publicly viewable, community notes could increase user trust in the platform.

5. Collaborative assessment

• The consensus principle ensures that comments from users with different perspectives are evaluated and accepted.

The launch of Community Notes marks a fundamental shift in Meta's content moderation strategy. While the model shows potential to combat misinformation more effectively and engage users more, its long-term effectiveness remains uncertain.

Potential further developments

• Expansion of the function to international markets
• Integration of AI-powered tools to support the community with moderation
• Improvements to the consensus building algorithm

Implications for the advertising industry

The decision to exclude paid ads from Community Notes could have far-reaching consequences for the advertising industry. Brands and advertisers may need to adapt their strategies to meet the growing need for transparency and credibility.

With “Community Notes” Meta is taking a step into a new era of content moderation. Whether this approach will have the desired effect depends on how effectively the community is involved and whether Meta succeeds in addressing the system's weaknesses. The experiment could not only transform Meta's platforms, but also redefine how social media deals with misinformation overall.

From local to global: SMEs conquer the global market with clever strategies - Image: Xpert.Digital

At a time when a company's digital presence determines its success, the challenge is how to make this presence authentic, individual and far-reaching. Xpert.Digital offers an innovative solution that positions itself as an intersection between an industry hub, a blog and a brand ambassador. It combines the advantages of communication and sales channels in a single platform and enables publication in 18 different languages. The cooperation with partner portals and the possibility of publishing articles on Google News and a press distribution list with around 8,000 journalists and readers maximize the reach and visibility of the content. This represents an essential factor in external sales & marketing (SMarketing).

More about it here:

• Authentic. Individually. Global: The Xpert.Digital strategy for your company

Competition for X? Meta relies on user-based moderation - with one crucial difference

In a remarkable strategic realignment that inevitably draws comparisons to Platform X (formerly Twitter) under Elon Musk, Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, is introducing the new “Community Notes” system. This user-based moderation tool is intended to replace the previous, often criticized fact-checking programs in the future. A key difference to the X model, however, is that Meta's “Community Notes” will not apply to paid advertising for the time being. This feature, which aims to provide additional contextual information or corrections to organic content, is limited to posts for which Meta has not received direct funding to distribute. Organic content therefore includes all those posts, images, videos and text articles that users and pages create and share without any paid promotion through Meta.

The cornerstones of the new system

The introduction of Community Notes marks a significant step in Meta's approach to content moderation and combating misinformation. The most important aspects of this innovation can be summarized as follows:

Scope

A central point is the limitation of the “Community Notes” to organic content. Paid advertising remains initially unaffected by this system. This decision raises questions about responsibility for the accuracy of advertising messages and could lead to a division of the information landscape within the meta-platforms.

Defining organic content

Organic content includes all posts that do not achieve greater reach through paid placements. This includes everyday user posts, contributions from friends and family, but also communication from brands and influencers, unless this is explicitly advertised. The gray area between organic and paid content, especially in the area of ​​influencer marketing, remains a point of discussion.

Time frame for the introduction

Meta is planning a gradual introduction of the “Community Notes”. The first is the United States, where the function will be rolled out in the coming months. It is expected that Meta will use the experience in the US to optimize the system before making it available in additional regions and countries.

Affected platforms

The “Community Notes” will be rolled out across Meta’s entire ecosystem, i.e. on Facebook, Instagram and the text-based platform Threads. This comprehensive implementation underlines the importance that Meta attaches to this new approach.

Implications and open questions

The introduction of the “Community Notes” has a number of implications and at the same time raises important questions, the answers to which will significantly influence the future use and acceptance of the system:

Treatment of brand communication

One of the key ambiguities concerns the treatment of organic posts by brands and influencers. Are these contributions treated the same as those from private individuals? What criteria are used to decide whether an annotation is appropriate? The answer to these questions is crucial for companies' advertising and marketing strategies on the meta platforms. It remains to be seen whether brands will actively seek to avoid “community notes” on their posts, or whether they could even use this system strategically to reinforce their messages.

Impact on the advertising industry

Meta's decision not to apply Community Notes to paid advertising is causing lively debate within the advertising industry. Advertisers must now ask themselves how to deal with the potential discrepancy between the potential labeling of organic posts and the lack of opportunity with paid ads. This could lead to a shift in advertising budgets or new strategies to increase the credibility of advertising messages.

Dealing with political content

The introduction of Community Notes is part of a broader restructuring of how Meta handles political content. The company has faced criticism in the past over its role in spreading political misinformation. Shifting moderation responsibility to the community could be interpreted as an attempt to refute this criticism while emphasizing freedom of expression. However, this approach also carries the risk that political camps could try to exploit the system for their own purposes.

Meta itself emphasizes that the details of the program are still under development and are subject to change. This statement highlights the experimental nature of the new system and leaves room for adjustments based on users' experiences and the challenges that will arise over time. The introduction of “Community Notes” is also interpreted internally as a return to the “roots of free expression” within the company, although critics see this as a pretext for reducing one's own responsibility for content moderation.

How “Community Notes” works in detail

The core principle of “Community Notes” is to leverage the collective intelligence of the user base to contextualize or correct posts. Below we explain how the system works in more detail:

User Contributions

If a user sees a post that they believe is misleading, incorrect, or needs context, they can add a comment. This note should be concise and ideally point to trustworthy sources to support the claim.

Community evaluation process

The comments created are not immediately visible to the public, but go through an evaluation process. Other users who have registered as Community Notes contributors can rate these notes. They can indicate whether they find the comment helpful and informative or not.

Consensus finding is key

An intelligent algorithm analyzes the ratings of different users. Particular weight is given to reviews from users who have represented different perspectives in the past and yet agree in their reviews. This principle of consensus building is intended to ensure that only comments that are widely accepted within the community and are not dominated by individual interest groups are published.

Visibility of annotations

Only comments that receive a sufficient number of upvotes and show consensus across diverse perspectives will be visible under the original post. This is to ensure the quality and relevance of the information displayed.

Goals and the replacement of the fact-checking program

With the introduction of the “Community Notes” Meta is pursuing several strategic goals. A key concern is reducing the spread of misinformation on the platforms. By giving users the opportunity to contextualize or correct posts, the aim is to enable a faster and more direct response to false reports. This approach is also interpreted internally as a return to the “roots of free expression” within the company.

At the same time, the introduction of “Community Notes” means the end of the current fact-checking program in the USA. Meta has previously worked with external fact-checking organizations to verify controversial content. However, this program was repeatedly criticized, both by users who felt their freedom of expression was restricted and by fact-checkers themselves who found working with Meta difficult. The “Community Notes” therefore represent an internal solution that is potentially more cost-effective and shifts more responsibility for information quality to the user community.

Challenges and criticism of the new system

Despite the promising approaches, the “Community Notes” system also presents a number of challenges and points of criticism:

Shifting responsibility

Greater involvement of the community in content moderation also means shifting responsibility for the quality and accuracy of information to users. It remains to be seen whether the community can fully meet this responsibility. There is a risk that users may not have the necessary skills to correctly classify complex issues.

Loss of control over brand messages

For companies and brands, the introduction of “Community Notes” means a potential loss of control over their organic messages. There is a risk that critical comments among your posts could negatively influence brand perception. The question is how brands will deal with this new form of public debate.

Potential susceptibility to errors and manipulation

A system that relies on the participation of a large number of users is potentially vulnerable to manipulation. Organized groups may attempt to influence the evaluation process to promote certain narratives or suppress unfavorable opinions. It is crucial that Meta implements mechanisms to detect and stop such attempts.

Fears of increased spread of misinformation

Critics fear that eliminating the established fact-checking program while introducing an untested community-based system could actually encourage the spread of misinformation, especially in the early stages of implementation.

The parallel to X (formerly Twitter)

The comparison to the “Community Notes” system already implemented on X (also known there as “Community Notes”) is obvious. X also relies on the collective intelligence of its users to add contextual information to posts. However, there are also differences. For example, paid ads on X are also provided with “community notes”. However, the launch at Meta marks a significant shift in content management strategy and is expected to have a significant impact on how users interact with information on these platforms. It remains to be seen whether Meta can learn from X's experiences and avoid its vulnerabilities.

Detailed excursion: How “Community Notes” works in detail

To fully understand how Community Notes works, it is essential to take a closer look at the individual steps of the process:

The basic principle of participatory moderation

At its core, “Community Notes” is based on the idea of ​​participatory moderation. Instead of Meta itself being the central authority deciding on the accuracy of information, this task is placed in the hands of the user community.

Participation and writing comments

Not every user can automatically write “Community Notes”. Meta has established certain criteria that potential contributors must meet. These include, for example, a minimum account age and the absence of recent violations of community standards. Users who meet these criteria can post comments on posts that they consider to be misleading, incorrect, or that need additional context. These notes are limited in length (similar to short message services) and should ideally be supported by credible sources to support their significance. It is important to emphasize that these sources are not directly visible in the article, but serve as a basis for argumentation for the evaluation by other users.

The multi-layered evaluation process

After a note is written, it goes through a complex evaluation process. Other Community Notes contributors will have the opportunity to rate this note. They can indicate whether they find the comment “helpful” or “not helpful”. However, this evaluation process is not purely quantitative. An algorithm analyzes the reviews and takes a variety of factors into account.

The role of consensus building

A central element of the evaluation process is consensus building. Comments that are rated as helpful by users with different perspectives and opinions are significantly more likely to be published. So the system tries to find a consensus about the accuracy or necessary context of a contribution that will hold up across partisan or ideological divides. This approach is intended to ensure that the annotations displayed are widely accepted and are not the result of manipulation by individual interest groups.

Publication and visibility for users

If a note has received a sufficiently high number of upvotes and there is broad consensus that it is helpful, it will be published under the original post and will be visible to all users. What's also interesting is that users who have interacted with a post in the past that was later given a "community note" may be notified. This is to ensure that the correction or additional context reaches those who have already seen the original post.

Anonymity and transparency in the system

To reduce potential bias and promote free expression within the review process, Community Notes are published anonymously. The identity of the author of the comment is not visible to other users. At the same time, Meta attaches great importance to transparency in the system itself. The basic principles of the evaluation process and the criteria for participation as a contributor are publicly visible.

Continuous improvement and gamification elements

The “Community Notes” system is not static, but is continually developed and improved. Meta analyzes user feedback and adapts the algorithms and processes accordingly. There are also gamification elements to promote active participation and the quality of contributions. Users who regularly post helpful comments can earn points and achieve Top Writer status, which may grant them additional rights or opportunities within the system.

The advantages and disadvantages of “Community Notes” compared to classic fact checks

Shifting from traditional fact-checking to a community-based system like Community Notes comes with specific advantages and disadvantages:

Advantages of decentralization and diversity

A key advantage of “Community Notes” is their decentralization. Unlike centralized fact-checking organizations, which may be subject to some bias, Community Notes are created and reviewed by a variety of users with diverse backgrounds and perspectives. This can lead to a greater diversity of perspectives and greater acceptance of the results as the comments are perceived as more balanced and less dominated by a single authority.

Scalability and responsiveness

Another advantage is the potential scalability and responsiveness of the system. By engaging large numbers of users, Community Notes can potentially review a much larger volume of content and respond to new trends and emerging misinformation more quickly than would be possible with a limited team of fact-checkers. Raising awareness of misleading information in real time is a critical factor in the fight against the spread of false news.

Promoting media literacy among users

“Community Notes” can also have a positive influence on users’ media literacy. By actively engaging in the information review process, users are encouraged to conduct their own research, critically evaluate sources, and develop a deeper understanding of the complexity of information.

Independence and transparency

Ideally, “community notes” are more independent of government or corporate interests than professional fact-checkers, whose funding and direction can sometimes raise questions. The transparent evaluation process of “Community Notes” can also strengthen users’ trust in the system. Since the selection process is publicly visible, traceability is increased.

Collaborative evaluation as a quality feature

The evaluation process, which is based on the consensus of various users, is another quality feature of “Community Notes”. The fact that a comment has been rated as helpful by people with different perspectives increases its credibility.

However, the disadvantages should not be ignored

There is a risk of manipulation by organized groups that may attempt to influence the evaluation process in their favor. The response time for flagging viral disinformation could be slower than for professional fact-checkers who have dedicated resources. And the reach of Community Notes may be limited because not all users actively participate in the review process. Therefore, Community Notes is not a panacea, but rather a complementary method to combat misinformation that has its own strengths and weaknesses.

A promising approach with open questions

Meta's launch of Community Notes is a bold move that has the potential to fundamentally transform content moderation on social media. Shifting responsibility to the community presents opportunities for greater diversity and faster response to misinformation. At the same time, the challenges and risks should not be underestimated. It remains to be seen how the system will perform in practice, whether it will succeed in preventing manipulation and gaining the trust of users. The coming months will show whether Meta actually finds a more effective way to deal with the flood of information and disinformation on its platforms with this new approach.

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form below or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) .

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

Xpert.Digital is a hub for industry with a focus on digitalization, mechanical engineering, logistics/intralogistics and photovoltaics.

With our 360° business development solution, we support well-known companies from new business to after sales.

Market intelligence, smarketing, marketing automation, content development, PR, mail campaigns, personalized social media and lead nurturing are part of our digital tools.

You can find out more at: www.xpert.digital - www.xpert.solar - www.xpert.plus