Artificial intelligence in financial journalism: Bloomberg fights with faulty AI summary

Are AI implementation suitable for everyday use? Bloomberg's bumpy start with automated summaries

The integration of artificial intelligence into journalism presents media companies with complex challenges, as the current case of Bloomberg shows. The financial instruction service has been experimenting with AI-generated summaries for its articles since January 2025, but had to correct at least 36 incorrect summaries. This situation illustrates the difficulties in implementing AI systems in the editorial area, in particular with regard to accuracy, reliability and trust in automated content. The following sections shed light on the specific problems at Bloomberg, set them in the context of general AI challenges and discuss possible solutions for successful integration of AI in journalism.

Suitable for:

• Trusty AI: Europe's trump card and the chance of taking on a leading role in artificial intelligence

Bloomberg's problematic entry into AI-generated content

The susceptibility of AI meetings

Bloomberg, a world's leading company for financial news, began to place Bulletpoints as summaries at the beginning of his articles in early 2025. Since this introduction on January 15, however, the company has had to correct at least three dozen of these automated summaries, which indicates significant problems with the accuracy of the AI ​​generated content. These problems are particularly problematic for a company like Bloomberg, which is known for its precise financial reporting and whose information can often have a direct impact on investment decisions. The need for numerous corrections undermines confidence in the reliability of this new technology and raises questions about premature implementation of AI systems in journalism.

A particularly significant mistake occurred when Bloomberg reported on President Trump's planned autozölle. While the actual article correctly stated that Trump would possibly announce the tariffs on the same day, the AI-generated summary contained incorrect information about the time of a more comprehensive customs measure. In another case, a AI summary incorrectly claimed that President Trump had already imposed tariffs against Canada in 2024. Such mistakes show the limits of the AI ​​in the interpretation of complex messages and the risks when unusual -tested automated content is published.

In addition to false date, the errors also included incorrect numbers and incorrect attributions of actions or statements about people or organizations. These types of errors, often referred to as “hallucinations”, represent a special challenge for AI systems, since they can sound plausible and are therefore difficult to recognize if there is no thorough human review. The frequency of these errors at Bloomberg underlines the need for robust review processes and raises questions about the maturity of the AI ​​technology used.

Bloomberg's reaction to the AI ​​problems

In an official statement, Bloomberg emphasized that 99 percent of the AI ​​generated summaries would correspond to the editorial standards. According to its own statements, the company publishes thousands of articles every day and therefore sees the error rate as relatively low. According to his own statements, Bloomberg attaches importance to transparency and corrects or updated items if necessary. It was also emphasized that journalists have full control over whether a AI generated summary is published or not.

John Micklethwait, editor-in-chief of Bloomberg, described the reasons for AI summary in an essay on January 10, which was based on a lecture at City St. George's, University of London. He explained that customers appreciate them because they can quickly recognize what a story is, while journalists are more skeptical. He admitted that reporters fear that readers could only rely on the summaries and no longer read the actual story. Nevertheless, Micklethwait emphasized that the value of a AI summary depends exclusively on the quality of the underlying history-and people are still crucial for them.

A Bloomberg spokeswoman told the New York Times that the feedback on the summaries was generally positive and that the company continued to improve experience. This statement indicates that Bloomberg wants to capture despite the problems of using the strategy of using AI for summaries, but with an increased focus on quality assurance and refinement of the technology used.

AI in journalism: a topic that is relevant to the industry

Experiences of other media companies with AI

Bloomberg is not the only media company that experiment with the integration of AI into its journalistic processes. Many news organizations try to find out how you can best integrate this new technology into your reporting and editorial work. The Gannett newspaper chain uses similar AI generated summaries for your articles, and the Washington Post has developed a tool called “ASK the Post” that generates answers to questions from published postal items. This broad adoption shows the considerable interest of the media industry in AI technologies, despite the associated risks and challenges.

Problems with AI tools have also occurred in other media companies. At the beginning of March, the Los Angeles Times removed its AI tool from an opinion article after the technology described the KU Klux-Klan as something other than a racist organization. This incident illustrates that the challenges that Bloomberg faces are not isolated, but symptomatically for wider problems with the integration of AI into journalism. There is a pattern in which the technology is not yet mature enough to work reliably without human supervision, especially with sensitive or complex topics.

These examples illustrate the tension between the desire for innovation and efficiency by AI on the one hand and the need to maintain journalistic standards and accuracy on the other. Media companies have to do a balancing act: they want to benefit from the advantages of AI without risking their readers' trust or compromising basic journalistic principles. Bloomberg's experiences and other news organizations serve as important teachings for the entire industry about the possibilities and limits of AI in journalism.

Suitable for:

• One reason for the hesitant use of AI: 68% of HR managers complain about a lack of AI know-how in companies

The special challenge in financial journalism

In the financial sector, where Bloomberg acts as one of the leading intelligence services, the requirements for accuracy and reliability are particularly high. The effects of incorrect information can have significant financial consequences here, since investors and financial experts make decisions based on this news. This special responsibility makes the integration of AI technologies in financial journalism an even greater challenge than in other areas of reporting.

Interestingly, the “Generalist-KI” exceeded the special KI of Bloomberg in its domain, the financialbery analysis. Bloomberg had an estimated at least $ 2.5 million invested in the development of its own financial AI, but not even a year after the introduction at the end of March 2023 it became clear that general AI models such as Chatgpt and GPT-4 provide better results in this area. This illustrates the rapid development in the field of artificial intelligence and the difficulty for companies to keep up with specialized solutions if the general models are becoming increasingly efficient.

AI & XR 3D Rendering Machine: Fivefold expertise from Xpert.Digital in a comprehensive service package, R&D XR, PR & SEM - Image: Xpert.Digital

Xpert.Digital has in-depth knowledge of various industries. This allows us to develop tailor-made strategies that are tailored precisely to the requirements and challenges of your specific market segment. By continually analyzing market trends and following industry developments, we can act with foresight and offer innovative solutions. Through the combination of experience and knowledge, we generate added value and give our customers a decisive competitive advantage.

More about it here:

• Use the 5x expertise of Xpert.Digital in one package - starting at just €500/month

Fundamental challenges of the generative AI

The hallucination problem in AI models

One of the most fundamental challenges for AI systems, which also became clear at Bloomberg's summaries, is the problem of “hallucinations”-that is, the tendency of AI models, to generate plausibly sounding, but in fact incorrect information. This problem occurs when AI systems generate content that goes beyond the information provided to them or if they misinterpret data. Such hallucinations are particularly problematic in journalism, where faithful and accuracy are of crucial importance.

The problems experienced by Bloomberg are precisely such hallucinations: the AI ​​“invented” data such as the introductory date of Trump's auto duties or wrongly claimed that Trump would have already imposed tariffs against Canada in 2024. This type of error underlines the limits of current AI technology, especially when it comes to the precise interpretation of complex information.

Experts indicate that hallucinations can be triggered by various factors, among other things by the way training prompts and texts are encoded. Large Language Models (LLMS) link terms with a number of numbers, so -called vector encodings. In the case of ambiguous words such as “bank” (which can describe both a financial institution and a seating)), there may be coding per meaning to avoid ambiguity. Every error in the coding and decoding of representations and texts can lead to the generative AI hallucinated.

Transparency and understandability of AI decisions

Another fundamental problem with AI systems is the lack of transparency and traceability of your decision-making processes. With some AI methods, it is no longer understandable how a certain prediction or a certain result comes about or why a AI system has reached a specific answer in the event of a specific question. This lack of transparency, often referred to as a “black box problem”, makes it difficult to identify and correct mistakes before they are published.

The traceability is particularly important in areas such as journalism, where decisions about content should be transparent and justifiable. If Bloomberg and other media companies cannot understand why their AI generates incorrect summaries, it will be difficult to make systemic improvements. Instead, they rely on reactive corrections after errors have already occurred.

This challenge is also identified by experts from business and science. Although it is primarily a technical challenge, it can also lead to problematic results from a social or legal perspective in certain areas of application. In the case of Bloomberg, this could lead to a loss of trust among readers or in the worst case to financial decisions based on incorrect information.

Dependence on data quality and scope

In addition, applications based on AI depend on the quality of the data and algorithms. In this way, systematic errors in data or algorithms can often not be recognized in view of the size and complexity of the data used. This is another fundamental challenge that Bloomberg and other companies have to deal with when implementing AI systems.

The problem with the amount of data - the AI ​​can only take into account relatively small “context windows” in the processing of commands, the prompt, has really shrunk in recent years, but remains a challenge. The Google Ki model “Gemini 1.5 Pro 1M” can already process one promptly in the extent of 700,000 words or an hour of video-more than 7 times as much as the currently best GPT model from Openaai. Nevertheless, tests show that artificial intelligence can search for data, but has difficulty collecting relationships.

Suitable for:

• Cost reduction and optimization of efficiency are dominant business principles-AI risk and the choice of the right AI model

Solution approaches and future developments

Human surveillance and editorial processes

An obvious solution to the problems experienced by Bloomberg is increased human monitoring of the AI ​​generated content. Bloomberg has already emphasized that journalists have full control over whether a AI generated summary is published or not. However, this control must be effectively exercised, which means that editors must have enough time to check the AI ​​summits before they are published.

The implementation of robust editorial processes for checking AI-generated content is crucial to minimize mistakes. This could include that all AI summits must be checked by at least one human editor before they are published or that certain types of information (such as data, numbers or attributions) are particularly thoroughly checked. Such processes increase the workload and thus reduce part of the efficiency gains by AI, but are necessary to protect the accuracy and credibility.

Technical improvements in the AI ​​models

The technical development of the AI ​​models itself is another important approach to solving the current problems. Already with GPT-4, hallucinations have decreased significantly compared to the predecessor GPT-3.5. The most recent model from Anthropic, “Claude 3 Opus”, shows even fewer hallucinations in initial tests. Soon the error rate of voice models should be lower than that of the average man. Nevertheless, AI language models will probably not be flawless until further notice, unlike computers.

A promising technical approach is the “Mixture of Experts”: several small special models are connected to a gate network. Entering to the system is analyzed by the gate and then passed on to one or more experts if necessary. In the end, the answers to an overall word are combined. In this way, it can be avoided that the entire model must always become active in its complexity. This type of architecture could potentially improve accuracy by using specialized models for certain types of information or domains.

Realistic expectations and transparent communication

After all, it is important to have realistic expectations of AI systems and to communicate transparently across their skills and limits. AI systems are specifically defined for a specific application context today and are far from being comparable to human intelligence. This knowledge should lead to the implementation of AI in journalism and other areas.

Bloomberg and other media companies should communicate transparently about their use of AI and make it clear that AI-generated content can be incorrect. This could be done by explicit labeling of AI generated content, transparent error correction processes and open communication across the limits of technology used. Such transparency can help to maintain the trust of the reader, even if errors occur.

Why does AI integration fail in journalism without people

Bloomberg's experiences with AI generated summaries illustrate the complex challenges in the integration of artificial intelligence into journalism. The at least 36 errors that had to be corrected since January show that despite its potential, the technology is not yet mature enough to be reliably used without thorough human surveillance. The problems with which Bloomberg is confronted are not unique, but reflect fundamental challenges of AI, such as hallucinations, lack of transparency and the dependence on high -quality data.

Several approaches are required for a successful integration of AI into journalism: robust editorial processes for the review of AI generated content, continuous technical improvements in the AI ​​models itself and transparent communication about the skills and limits of the technology used. Bloomberg's experience can serve as a valuable lesson for other media companies that plan similar AI implementations.

The future of AI-based journalism depends on how well it is to use the efficiency gains and innovative possibilities of AI without compromising journalistic standards. The key is in a balanced approach that views the technology as a tool that supports human journalists instead of replacing them. As John Micklethwait from Bloomberg aptly noted: "A AI summary is only as good as the story on which it is based. And people are still important for the stories."

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development

Konrad Wolfenstein

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form below or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) .

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

Xpert.Digital is a hub for industry with a focus on digitalization, mechanical engineering, logistics/intralogistics and photovoltaics.

With our 360° business development solution, we support well-known companies from new business to after sales.

Market intelligence, smarketing, marketing automation, content development, PR, mail campaigns, personalized social media and lead nurturing are part of our digital tools.

You can find out more at: www.xpert.digital - www.xpert.solar - www.xpert.plus