Published on: March 23, 2025 / update from: March 23, 2025 - Author: Konrad Wolfenstein
XR glasses comparison test: Rayneo Air 2 S vs. Xreal Air 2 Vits. Viture Pro XR Viture One Lite - Symbol image: Xpert.digital
Experience Extended Reality: Which XR glasses are best suited?
XR glasses in comparison-which model suits you?
XR glasses (Extended Reality) conquer the market as innovative, portable displays. They merge digital content with the real world or take us into virtual spheres. However, the variety of models makes the choice difficult. This comparison takes a close look at four current XR glasses: Rayneo Air 2 S, XReal Air 2, Viture Pro XR and Viture One Lite XR. Our goal is to offer you a well-founded basis for decision-making so that you can find the XR glasses that fit optimally with your needs and preferences. We analyze technical data, design, comfort, functions, prices, user feedback, target groups and typical areas of application.
Suitable for:
Technical specifications in detail
Display technology: OLED as the standard
All four glasses rely on micro-oled displays. This technology guarantees high contrasts and lively colors for an excellent visual experience. Self -illuminating pixels provide deep black tones and bright white. Micro-Oled is ideal for compact, portable devices such as XR glasses. It should be emphasized that Xreal relies on Sony Mini-Oled Panels, which makes the highest image quality expect. The Viture One Lite, as a cheaper option, does not do without OLED and thus underlines the focus on a high -quality display in all price ranges.
Resolution: Full HD for all models
All test candidates offer a Full HD resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels per eye. The Rayneo Air 2 S stands out slightly here by using 3840 x 1080 pixels in 3D mode and advertising a virtual screen size of 201 inch. Xreal Air 2 potentially exceeds this with up to 330 inches of virtual size. Viture Pro XR projects 135 inches, the one Lite 120 inches - still impressive values, but somewhat smaller than the competition.
Corporate repetition frequency: liquid images thanks to 120Hz (partially)
Rayneo Air 2 S and Viture Pro XR offer 120Hz, ideal for liquid gaming and videos with fast movements. The Rayneo Air 2 S allows the user to choose between 60Hz and 120Hz to optimize the battery life. Xreal Air 2 reaches up to 120Hz in 2D mode and 90Hz in 3D mode. The Viture One Lite, on the other hand, is limited to 60Hz, which is sufficient for many applications, but can look less fluid in the event of fast content.
Viewing field (FOV): Similar immersion, small differences
Rayneo Air 2 S, XReal Air 2 and Viture Pro XR offer a similar field of vision of 45 ° to 46 °. This ensures a good balance between immersion and perception of the area. The Viture One Lite has a slightly smaller field of vision at 43 °, which minimally reduces the immersion.
Design and comfort: lightweights with individual strengths
Weight: slight differences in the wearing feeling
With 72-75G, the XReal Air 2 is the easiest, followed by Viture One Lite (76g), the Viture Pro XR (77g) and the Rayneo Air 2 S (78g). The differences are low, but Xreal and Viture One Lite could be minimally more pleasant with a long time. Rayneo scores with an improved weight distribution, while Xreal is occasionally perceived as slightly front -heavy despite the low weight. Viture Pro relies on a high -quality aluminum housing without significantly increasing the weight, while the One Lite is lighter by plastic.
Fit: adaptation options for every head?
All glasses offer different adaptation options. Rayneo and XReal rely on extensive physical adjustments to temples, nose pads and perspectives. Rayneo offers the greatest variety here, but misses an IPD adjustment (eye spacing). XReal offers different nose pad sizes. Viture Pro and One Lite focus on interchangeable nose pads and integrated myopia correction (myopia up to -5 diopters). This is a great advantage for glasses wearers. Occasionally, Viture Pro is reported by nasal terminals and an overly sitting display, while one lite could have fit with larger heads.
Setting options: fine tuning for optimal seat
The setting options are already described in detail in terms of weight and fit. In summary, it can be said that Rayneo and Xreal rely more on the physical frame adjustment, while Viture focuses on myopia correction.
Functions and functionalities: more than just a display
Connectivity: USB-C as the basis, optional wirelessness
All glasses use USB-C for video and power supply. Rayneo and Xreal offer optional wireless adapters for wireless transmission. Viture Pro XR also offers a magnetic Pogo-PIN connection that could be more practical. Bluetooth is integrated at XReal (via Beam Pro) and Viture Pro.
Accounting time: power supply via USB-C, optional battery packs
None of the glasses have an integrated battery. They are supplied with electricity via USB-C. However, all manufacturers offer optional battery packs (Rayneo Pocket TV, XReal Beam, Viture Pro Mobile Dock/Neckband) with different terms (3-20 hours, depending on the model and application).
Integrated audio output: Sound worlds in miniature format
Rayneo Air 2 S trumps with four Super Linear speakers and “Whisper Mode” for reduced noise. XReal Air 2 relies on open-ear speakers and microphones. Viture Pro and One Lite offer Harman Audioefx with Spatial Sound and Reverse Sound Field Design for an immersive sound experience. Viture promises the best sound here, while Xreal is criticized in tests.
Device compatibility: universally connected
All four glasses are compatible with a variety of USB-C devices, including iPhones (from iPhone 15), Android smartphones, macbooks, iPads, Steam Deck, Rog Ally, Nintendo Switch, PlayStation and Xbox. The compatibility is therefore very wide in all models.
Price overview and price-performance ratio: something for each budget
- Rayneo Air 2 S: 299 - 419.99 USD
- XReal Air 2: 299-399 USD (pro version), Ultra significantly more expensive ($ 699)
- Viture Pro XR: 399 - 459 USD
- Viture One Lite XR: 279 - 349.99 USD
The Viture One Lite is the cheapest option, followed by Rayneo and Xreal in the middle price segment. The Viture Pro XR is the most expensive in comparison.
User reviews and test reports: What do the experts and users say?
- Rayneo Air 2 S: Praise: Fantastic display (bright, clear, 120Hz), good sound, comfortable, easy operation, affordable. Criticism: No IPD adjustment, border blur, no AI/camera, looks a bit “cheap”. Conclusion: Convince positive price-performance ratio, display and price.
- XReal Air 2: Praise: comfortable, light, light and sharp display, simple operation. Criticism: weak sound (bass, volume), limited XR functions, software problems (Nebula), glare/blurring for some users. Conclusion: good for entertainment, comfort and display top, software limits productivity.
- VITURE PRO XR: Praise: Large, bright 120Hz display, myopia setting, effective dimmer, high-quality design, strong software (spacewalker). Criticism: high price, quiet tone, nasal terminals, chunkier design. Conclusion: Premium display and functions convince, price and comfort could be better.
- VITURE ONE LITE XR: praise: cheap price, good display quality, Harman-Audio, myopia setting, wide compatibility. Criticism: not dimmable (sun visor required), 60Hz, no battery, glare problems. Conclusion: strong price-performance ratio, ideal for media consumption and gaming, cuts in features.
Target groups and applications: Who benefits from which glasses?
- Rayneo Air 2 S: target group: price -conscious user, media consumption (films, streaming), casual player. Application cases: watch films, stream videos, simple gaming, external screen for productivity.
- XReal Air 2: Target group: wide audience, gamers (handheld consoles), streaming fans, users who are looking for mobility and productivity. Application cases: gaming on the go, streaming, travel, mobile productivity. Ultra version for developers (mixed reality).
- VITURE PRO XR: Target group: gamers, travelers, professionals (mobile workplace), people with myopia. Application cases: immersive gaming, private film entertainment, remote work, cloud gaming.
- VITURE ONE LITE XR: Target group: price-conscious buyer, XR beginners, media consumers, casual players. Application cases: media consumption, simple gaming, basic productivity, entry into XR.
Summary comparison: similarities and differences at a glance
Commonalities
- Portable, large virtual screens
- USB-C connectivity
- Integrated audio output
- OLED-based displays
- Myopia setting (Viture & Rayneo)
differences
- Display brightness (Viture Pot potentially the brightest)
- Boterhot frequency (120Hz vs. 60Hz)
- Viewing field (one lite a little smaller)
- Weight (XReal the easiest)
- Adaptation options (physically vs. myopia focus)
- Acculeration (depending on the accessory)
- Audio quality (Rayneo Quad-Speaker, Viture Harman)
- Dimming (only pro models)
- Price
Comparison of the XR glasses
The XR glasses Rayneo Air 2 S, XReal Air 2, Viture Pro XR Glasses and Viture One Lite XR Glasses differ in several characteristics. The display technology ranges from micro-oled to micro/mini-oled (Sony), while the resolution per eye is in all models at 1920 x 1080, with additional 3D options for some devices. The refresh frequency varies between 60Hz and 120Hz, depending on the model and mode. The field of vision (FOV) is between 43 ° and 46 °. When weighed, the glasses have differences and move between 72 g and 78 g. While the myopia setting at Rayneo Air 2 S and the XReal Air 2 is not possible, the viture glasses offer an adjustment from 0.00d to -500d. Connectivity dominate USB-C interfaces, supplemented by optional wireless adapters or other technologies such as Bluetooth or Magnet Pogo PIN in the Viture models. Integrated audio systems range from 4 Super Linear speakers to Harman Audioefx with Spatial Sound. None of the glasses have their own power supply, but they can be combined with batteries in external devices such as a Pocket TV, Beam or Mobile Dock, whereby the battery power is between 3 and 20 hours. All glasses are compatible with a variety of USB-C devices. In terms of price, the models are between $ 279 and 459. User ratings highlight the good display and the sound of the cheap Rayneo Air 2 S, while the Xreal Air 2 is rated as comfortable, but with a weak audio. The Viture Pro XR Glasses convince with a great display and myopia setting, but are comparatively expensive. The affordable Viture One Lite XR Glasses score with Harman-Audio, but offer only 60Hz and no dimmability.
Suitable for:
Conclusion and recommendations: Which XR glasses is the right one for you?
All four XR glasses offer an impressive, portable visual experience.
- Rayneo Air 2 S: convinced with a strong display, 120Hz and good sound at an attractive price. Ideal for price -conscious gamers and media consumers. Smokes with IPD adjustment and processing.
- XReal Air 2: offers high comfort and a bright display. However, recommended for all-round users and mobile productivity, audio and software could be improved.
- VITURE PRO XR: The premium option with outstanding display, myopia setting and dimmer. Perfect for demanding users and frequent players, the price is higher and the sound could be louder.
- Viture One Lite XR: The inexpensive alternative with good display quality, Harman audio and myopia setting. Ideal for XR beginners and price-conscious media consumers, compromises in refresh rate frequency and dimming function.
recommendations
Budget tip & XR beginners
Viture One Lite XR Glasses
Gaming & price-performance
Rayneo Air 2 S
Comfortable all -rounder
XReal Air 2
Premium experience & versatility
Viture Pro XR Glasses
The XR technology develops rapidly. Weigh your personal needs and priorities carefully to find the optimal XR glasses
The XR technology continues to develop rapidly and always offers new opportunities for immersive experiences. Forecasts show impressive growth for the XR market in the coming years, with estimates of up to $ 187.4 billion for the VR market by 2030. At the same time, it is expected that the AR market could even reach $ 1,869.4 billion by 2032.
When choosing XR glasses, you should take various factors into account:
- Resolution and field of vision: A high resolution and a wide field of vision contribute to a more immense experience.
- Comfort: Since you may wear the glasses for a long time, the wearing comfort is decisive.
- Performance: Powerful hardware is important for liquid movements and to avoid motion sickness.
- Audio quality: Integrated speakers and microphones can significantly improve the experience.
- Battery life: Depending on the area of application, a longer battery life can be an advantage.
- Price-performance ratio: The prices for XR glasses vary greatly. Choose a model that meets your requirements and fits your budget.
The future of XR technology promises even more powerful hardware, higher resolutions and more comfortable designs. When choosing XR glasses, it is important to take your individual requirements into account. Whether you want to use the glasses for gaming, professional applications or educational purposes, every area of application places different requirements for technology.
Also consider the compatibility with existing systems and the availability of content for the selected platform. The integration of artificial intelligence into XR systems will enable personalized and more intelligent experiences in the future.
Ultimately, there is no universal best XR glasses. The optimal choice depends on your specific needs, your budget and the intended area of application. Take the time to compare different models and, if possible, test before making a decision. With the right XR glasses, you can immerse yourself in fascinating new worlds and benefit from the diverse possibilities of these future-oriented technology.
Suitable for:
Your global marketing and business development partner
☑️ Our business language is English or German
☑️ NEW: Correspondence in your national language!
Konrad Wolfenstein
I would be happy to serve you and my team as a personal advisor.
You can contact me by filling out the contact form or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) . My email address is: wolfenstein ∂ xpert.digital
I'm looking forward to our joint project.
