The campaign trap in B2B marketing: Why clicks are far from being business opportunities

Xpert Pre-Release

Available in 27 languages 📢

Published on: October 30, 2026 / Updated on: October 30, 2026 – Author: Konrad Wolfenstein

The campaign trap in B2B marketing: Why clicks are far from being business opportunities – Creative image on the topic, with AI: Xpert.Digital

Why good B2B deals often begin before the sales team even knows about them

What B2B buyers really want – and why irrelevant contacts are harmful

Rethinking B2B marketing: Less activism, more market understanding

Many B2B companies measure the success of their marketing by clicks, reach, and the number of new contacts. These metrics are easily visible – but they don't necessarily show whether a concrete need is developing in the customer market or whether a viable business opportunity can arise. Those who primarily produce campaigns and count responses risk generating a lot of activity without reaching the right customers at the right time.

At the same time, business customers are increasingly conducting their own research and expect suppliers to understand their situation rather than bombarding them with standardized messages. Therefore, the key is not to acquire as many contacts as possible, but to recognize relevant market changes early on and carefully assess them. A potential investment opportunity is not yet proof of concrete need – and an interesting contact opportunity is not yet a sales opportunity.

The following article explains why B2B marketing shouldn't be measured against the standards of simple consumer goods campaigns, how companies can distinguish genuine market signals from mere assumptions, and why long-term brand building remains crucial. It also explores how marketing and sales can improve their collaboration, measure impact more effectively, and utilize digital tools and artificial intelligence meaningfully – without generating more irrelevant communication.

Clicks lead to careers. Market signals lead to business.

B2B marketing loses its economic impact when it primarily organizes its work around campaigns, reach, and responses, instead of recognizing changes in the customer market and developing viable business opportunities from them. The problem isn't social media or email per se, but a management logic that more readily rewards visible communication performance than demonstrable customer value and additional revenue.

A campaign can be planned, presented, and concluded. The number of published posts, sent messages, and contacts gained is then recorded in a report. However, determining whether a potential customer is currently experiencing an investment opportunity, an exacerbated business problem, or a new decision-making constellation is emerging requires research, industry knowledge, and collaboration with sales. This work initially produces fewer tangible results but can be significantly more important for business success.

This creates an organizational contradiction: companies need a more precise understanding of their markets, yet they often optimize their marketing organization solely for producing communication measures. A commercially viable alternative doesn't replace campaigns with constant individual acquisition efforts. It combines long-term brand awareness, systematic market monitoring, and the targeted development of concrete contact and sales opportunities.

Where the B2C comparison fails

The focus on consumer goods marketing is initially understandable. Digital platforms, advertising formats, and automation tools work across industries. Business decision-makers also expect clear information, ease of use, and appealing presentation. No one becomes a fundamentally different person simply by switching from a personal smartphone to a work computer. Therefore, clarity and emotional connection are not inherently negative developments in B2B marketing.

The difficulties begin when companies infer similar purchasing processes from similar communication interfaces. For an industrial plant, a logistics solution, or enterprise-wide software, individual preference is not the sole deciding factor. Investment planning, technical compatibility, financing, operational reliability, internal responsibilities, and the consequences of potential failure all influence the decision. Therefore, a convinced contact person does not automatically guarantee a convinced company.

However, simply comparing straightforward B2C and complex B2B transactions is too simplistic. A private real estate purchase can be more demanding than a business reordering standardized equipment. The decisive factors are the investment amount, the need for explanation, the number of parties involved, switching costs, and perceived risk. The more pronounced these factors are, the less effective a marketing model becomes that aims to translate attention directly into a completed order.

Independent buyers, new requirements

The extent to which information-seeking behavior is changing is illustrated by a survey of 646 B2B buyers, published in March 2026, which was conducted in August and September 2025. In the survey, 67 percent generally preferred a purchasing process without sales representatives. Furthermore, 45 percent reported having used artificial intelligence in a recent purchase. These results suggest a preference for more independent research, but do not necessarily preclude personal consultation.

A separate study published in 2025 among 632 B2B buyers highlights the crucial differentiation. Digital self-service options were preferred for general information. However, personal interaction remained important for questions requiring contextualization within the specific business situation. At the same time, 73 percent stated that they actively avoid suppliers with irrelevant contact methods. Sixty-nine percent reported discrepancies between information on the supplier's website and statements made by the sales team.

The economic consequence, therefore, is not to replace sales with even more digital messages. A contact becomes valuable when it answers an open decision-making question better than the information already available. Conversely, an additional product presentation without relevance to the customer's situation can create extra work and damage trust. Relevance arises not from simply personalizing a greeting, but from understanding the business context.

Why campaigns win internally

Campaigns possess organizational characteristics that make them attractive to companies. They have a budget, a timeline, defined responsibilities, and tangible results. Agencies can bid on them, marketing teams can coordinate them, and managers can monitor their implementation. This standardization reduces coordination efforts. Especially under time pressure, this is a real advantage and not merely a sign of a lack of professionalism.

Systematic signaling efforts don't fit this pattern as well. An announced factory expansion is initially just a clue. Only when combined with the production structure, investment phase, existing technology, and potential contacts does a testable business hypothesis emerge. Some of these hypotheses are discarded. Others only become relevant months later. Anyone who measures such work solely by the number of contacts generated in the short term is evaluating it by a metric that misses the point.

Economic incentive theory explains this mechanism: When an activity includes both easily measurable and difficult-to-measure tasks, a strong reward for visible results can divert attention from other valuable tasks. In marketing, this applies, for example, to the relationship between measurable reactions and the more difficult-to-attribute market understanding. The organization then doesn't necessarily receive the most economically important performance, but rather the performance that its evaluation system rewards most strongly.

Career effects without blanket suspicion

The assumption that campaigns are popular partly because they benefit one's career describes a plausible mechanism. A highly visible product launch can be easily promoted internally and on professional platforms. The quiet groundwork for a later successful customer relationship is more difficult to distinguish. It may be distributed among marketing, sales, management, and technical experts.

However, this does not imply that marketing managers generally prefer ineffective measures for career reasons. A separate empirical study would be necessary to determine that. Campaigns can also generate significant business value. Rather, it is objectively valid to suggest that internal recognition, budget constraints, and short-term reporting requirements can systematically favor highly visible activities.

The responsibility therefore does not lie solely with individual employees. If management demands monthly reach and contact volumes but fails to seriously assess market knowledge or the quality of emerging business opportunities, it is itself creating the incentive for a campaign-oriented approach. A different approach requires different target metrics, longer observation periods, and the willingness to recognize carefully reasoned inactivity as a sound decision.

What constitutes a market signal

A market signal is an observable change that can increase or decrease the likelihood of a relevant business need. Examples include site expansions, new production lines, changes in management, altered supply chains, the end of technical support, or a publicly identifiable focus on automation. Internal information from service, consulting, and existing customer relationships can also provide valuable insights.

The crucial point is the distinction between a fact and its interpretation. A newly filled management position is a fact. The assumption that this increases the likelihood of a particular investment is initially a hypothesis. A job advertisement for automation experts can indicate a new project, but it could just as easily point to the replacement of departing employees. Reputable signaling documents this uncertainty instead of concealing it behind a seemingly precise score.

A commercially viable signal therefore requires context. It must align with the company's own service offering, be placed in a specific timeframe, and have a comprehensible connection to a potential customer problem. It becomes particularly valuable when several independent observations corroborate each other. Multiple published reports from the same source, on the other hand, do not constitute independent confirmation. The number of references should not be confused with the strength of the evidence.

A contact opportunity is not yet a sales opportunity

Several development steps lie between an interesting market observation and a viable sales opportunity. A business contact opportunity, or a qualified business contact opportunity, initially describes a factually justified reason for a helpful exchange with a relevant person. It does not yet require that a budget has already been allocated or a procurement project has been initiated.

A sales opportunity, meaning a qualified sales opportunity, requires more. A concrete problem or goal must be identifiable, the proposed solution must be a good fit, and the customer should have a clear and understandable path to a decision. What other criteria are necessary depends on the business model. For large investments, these typically include economic viability, stakeholders, timeframe, and a mutually agreed-upon next step.

This separation prevents two costly mistakes. First, early contact opportunities are not damaged by premature sales pressure. Second, they don't disappear into an unstructured address book. Marketing can facilitate relevant dialogue without having to immediately claim a sales opportunity. Sales receives fewer mere names and instead better-founded starting points. A contact file is therefore not yet a sales pipeline.

Early preferences, late visibility

An international study on B2B purchasing behavior from 2025, involving approximately 4,000 surveyed buyers, reveals the extent to which decisions are prepared before direct sales contact. 94 percent of the surveyed buyer groups had already ranked their preferred suppliers before the initial contact. In 77 percent of cases, the purchase was later made with the supplier favored at that time.

These values are not universally applicable laws of nature. They are based on retrospective data from a specific sample and cannot be directly applied to every German industry. Furthermore, an early preference does not prove that subsequent discussions are irrelevant. Previous project experience, recommendations, and existing relationships can influence both the initial selection and the final purchase.

Nevertheless, the strategic message is significant: those who only begin understanding the market after completing a contact request may be too late. At the same time, it would be wrong to conclude from this that direct outreach should begin earlier. Before a project even visibly begins, professional visibility, credible references, and recognition among multiple stakeholders are also crucial. Signal recognition and long-term positioning must work together.

Abundant data does not create certainty

Digital tools can track website visits, topic interest, and changes within a company. However, this doesn't automatically translate into purchase intent. A technical article could be read by a student, a competitor, a service provider, or a decision-maker without a current project. Even if the attribution to a company is correct, it remains unclear who is conducting the research and on whose behalf.

A particularly problematic aspect is confusing a statistical correlation with individual certainty. If companies with certain characteristics make purchases more frequently, it doesn't follow that every company with those characteristics actually intends to make a purchase. If genuine need is rare, even reliable detection methods can generate numerous false alarms. Therefore, a high technical accuracy score alone says little about how many of the prioritized companies are truly relevant.

A responsible organization therefore examines the accuracy of its alerts within its own market. It considers not only correctly identified projects, but also false alarms and overlooked opportunities. At the same time, it takes the age of the information into account. An investment alert can lose its value if the planning decision has already been made. Signals therefore require a defined period of validity and regular reassessment, not indefinite continuation within the system.

The price of misplaced attention

The costs of an unsuitable campaign extend beyond media budget and production expenses. They also include sales time, technical consulting, data maintenance, and the opportunity costs of missed opportunities. When salespeople have to requalify leads with little value, a seemingly inexpensive marketing metric is bought at the cost of additional work. The effort simply disappears from the marketing report.

For prioritization, an economic analysis of the expected contribution is therefore suitable. Relevant factors include the realistically achievable contribution margin, the probability of closing the deal based on the current information available, and all additional processing and implementation costs. A high potential revenue is insufficient if one's own service is poorly suited to the customer's needs or if the support provided would be disproportionately expensive. Risks arising from solvency, performance commitments, and customer concentration must also be included in the evaluation.

A calculated expected value must not create a false sense of precision. Early probabilities are uncertain and must be improved by empirical data from comparable cases. The real benefit lies in more disciplined decision-making: What next piece of information justifies what effort? Sometimes a brief expert discussion is useful. Sometimes observation suffices. And sometimes the most economically sound decision is to consciously choose not to pursue a perceived opportunity.

🎯🎯🎯 Data-driven B2B industry hub as a quasi-in-house solution

The quasi-in-house solution: How Xpert.Digital closes operational gaps in B2B marketing and sales – Smart Content-Driven Business - Image: Xpert.Digital

Xpert.Digital is a data-driven B2B industry hub led by Konrad Wolfenstein . The company acts as an external, quasi-in-house solution for industrial partners, closing operational gaps in marketing, content, and sales – without requiring additional resources on the client side.

More information here:

The quasi-in-house solution: How Xpert.Digital closes operational gaps in B2B marketing and sales – Smart Content-Driven Business

From tips for relevant conversations in sales

Brand building remains economically necessary

Legitimate criticism of a focus on campaigns should not lead to a devaluation of long-term brand building. In many B2B categories, companies only make purchases at longer intervals. A company that doesn't currently have a need can still be an important future customer. Therefore, brand awareness and industry recognition often need to be built before a concrete investment signal becomes visible.

The commonly used 95/5 rule illustrates this relationship: Only a small portion of the potential market is actively buying at any given time. The 95/5 ratio is explicitly a rule of thumb and not a universally measured market share. The actual size of the buying-ready share depends on the product category, replenishment frequency, economic conditions, and the time period under consideration.

Economically, this leads to a division of labor. Brand building increases the likelihood of being considered for future needs. Signal building improves the selection of situations where in-depth marketing makes sense. Sales work then helps with classification, profitability, and implementation. Those who rely solely on current signals risk being late to the market. Those who focus solely on building awareness leave concrete opportunities untapped.

Trust requires professional substance

Trust in B2B relationships isn't built solely through frequent visual contact. A company must demonstrate that it understands the operational consequences of its services and can provide reliable information. This can be achieved through comprehensible use cases, technical limitations, implementation experience, and transparent assumptions regarding economic viability. In particular, a clear and objective explanation of what a solution cannot achieve can strengthen credibility.

Herein lies an important distinction between general popularity and relevant brand recognition. A niche provider doesn't need to be famous across the entire market. They need to be considered a competent option in the right decision-making situations. A small, professionally relevant readership can be more valuable than a large but economically unsuitable reach. The size of the audience alone doesn't answer the question of a publication's value to a company.

At the same time, technical depth should not be confused with linguistic inaccessibility. Good B2B communication translates technical and economic concepts in a way that different stakeholders can understand. It makes requirements comparable, explains risks, and supports internal coordination. The content itself thus becomes part of the service: it reduces the costs incurred by a customer in research, evaluation, and decision-making.

From tip to relevant conversation

How signal-oriented marketing works in practice can be illustrated by a specific example from intralogistics. A company announces an additional location and simultaneously seeks personnel for warehouse management and automation. For a provider of material flow solutions, this is a potential reason to investigate, but not yet proof of an upcoming project with a suitable scope of services.

The next task is not to immediately launch a standardized email series. First, the location's function, project phase, potential system landscape, and existing relationships need to be clarified. From this, a hypothesis could emerge: the additional capacity might increase the coordination requirements between warehouse technology and higher-level software. Whether this assumption is correct must remain open until reliable information is available.

A helpful contact would address such a decision-making question instead of simply asserting a need. A professional exchange about typical interface risks or the early design of expansion phases would be conceivable. If no suitable responsibility, no relevant problem, or no permissible channel of contact emerges, monitoring is postponed. This selectivity is precisely what distinguishes professional market development from automated, ad-hoc exploitation.

Buyer groups need common standards

A survey of 632 B2B buyers published in 2025 reported that 74 percent of the buyer teams studied experienced problematic conflicts during decision-making. These included conflicting goals, disagreement about the approach, and decisions overruled by external stakeholders. Groups that reached a consensus were 2.5 times more likely to report a high-quality deal. This is a correlation, not experimental proof of a guaranteed effect.

For marketing, this finding is more important than the question of the next attention-grabbing format. A technical director might assess performance and integration. The finance department considers capital commitment and impact on earnings. Operations examines transition risks, while management evaluates strategic dependencies. A collection of isolated value propositions can further diverge these interests.

Therefore, a shared basis for decision-making is needed. This links economic objectives, technical requirements, risks, and implementation steps. Effective content helps stakeholders understand how their respective requirements are interconnected. The relevant unit is then no longer just the individual contact, but the customer group. A strong relationship with a person remains valuable, but it does not replace the viability of the decision within the company.

Distribution capacity is a scarce resource

In complex B2B markets, the processing of business opportunities cannot be scaled indefinitely. Qualified salespeople, application engineers, and consultants have limited time. An additional campaign might generate more contacts without enabling more economically viable processing. If downstream capacity is already stretched, the only potential benefit is increased waiting times.

The quality of prioritization thus becomes the decisive factor. Signals should not merely generate additional tasks, but rather increase the likelihood that existing specialist capacity is deployed in the right places. For this to happen, marketing needs to know which problems the company is particularly good at solving and which customer situations lead to above-average effort. Sales, in turn, must explain why a particular approach was accepted or rejected.

This feedback must not consist of blanket assessments. A rejected contact might be due to a lack of expertise, premature timing, existing commitments, or simply insufficient investigation. Only by differentiating between these reasons can the next decision be improved. Rejection and failure to close a deal also provide market information, provided they are carefully documented. An organization that only records successes learns from a systematically biased selection.

Channels must fulfill specific tasks

The alternative to a focus on campaigns is not a return to exclusively personal business relationships. An international B2B survey from 2024 of nearly 4,000 decision-makers from 13 countries identified an average of ten interaction channels used along the buying process. In 2016, this number was only five. Websites, personal meetings, and video conferences were among the most important touchpoints.

This argues for a coordinated approach to communication channels, rather than simply running as many simultaneous actions as possible. A technical contribution can clarify a problem. A website can explain technical requirements and performance limitations. A personal conversation can answer open questions about the specific application. An email can document an agreed-upon next step. Each channel thus has a role in the decision-making process.

In this model, social media is neither superfluous nor automatically strategic. It can showcase expertise, cultivate relationships, and provide clues about changes. Email can be useful if the occasion, justification, and content are appropriate. Mismanagement only begins when channel activity itself is considered a success. The crucial factor is whether the connection between touchpoints enables the customer to make a better decision.

AI exacerbates the conflict of objectives

Artificial intelligence reduces the effort required for texts, variations, and personalized messages. This allows campaign-centric organizations to initially expand their existing approach significantly. More content is created faster, additional target groups are reached, and the number of automated contact attempts increases. However, if the selection of recipients and the underlying need hypothesis remain weak, the production of irrelevant communication, in particular, becomes more efficient.

Another application lies in the processing of market information. AI can structure reports, assign company names, compile indications of changes, and make different documents comparable. It is particularly useful when it allows professionals to spend less time searching and more time evaluating. The economic impact arises not from the sheer volume of text, but from a better connection between information and decision-making.

Clear control rules are essential. Facts must be traceable back to verifiable evidence. Conclusions must be clearly identified as such. Outdated information, name mix-ups, and duplicated reports must be detected. An automatically generated statement about a company's supposed investment needs does not constitute reliable market knowledge. The responsibility for the contact decision remains with the provider, even if a system handles the preliminary work.

Access to data is not a right to contact

Signal-based marketing should not be confused with the notion that publicly available information automatically permits any form of communication. There are legal distinctions between monitoring business developments, processing personal data, and using a specific communication channel. An economically advantageous opportunity is not, therefore, automatically a legally permissible reason for contact.

In Germany, advertising via email generally requires prior explicit consent. The legal exception for existing customers only applies if all the stipulated conditions are met. The fact that a business address is publicly visible or that an offer is relevant to the company does not replace these requirements. For telephone advertising to businesses, at least presumed consent is required, the conditions for which must be examined in each specific case.

In addition, data protection requirements must be observed. These include a sound legal basis, transparency, and respecting objections to direct marketing. For business practices, this means that evaluating a business opportunity and authorizing contact are separate steps. Careful planning not only protects against legal consequences but also against the loss of trust that intrusive or unsolicited contact can cause.

Measure impact instead of counting touches

A common weakness of digital success measurement is the equation of temporal proximity with causation. If a buyer clicks on an ad shortly before completing a purchase, this does not prove that the ad triggered the purchase. Existing preference, previous project experience, or personal contact may have been the deciding factor. The last visible event then takes on a significance that it does not economically warrant.

Large-scale field experiments in the digital consumer goods sector have shown that conventional, non-experimental methods can significantly overestimate the impact of certain search ads. These findings cannot simply be applied to every B2B campaign. However, they do highlight the fundamental measurement problem: people who are already intending to buy are often more likely to click on relevant ads. The observed correlation can therefore be stronger than the actual additional effect.

For B2B companies, a combination of different audits is advisable. Where possible, comparable groups, phased implementations, and predefined success criteria are helpful. With small sample sizes, a structured review of individual business processes is also necessary. This must include consideration of customer structure, sales performance, and general market trends. No single metric can replace this contextualization, and every analysis should acknowledge its inherent uncertainty.

A pipeline needs quality standards

An economically sound management approach links early learning indicators with later business results. Early on, for example, it's possible to examine what proportion of researched leads result in a viable need hypothesis and how often this leads to a helpful conversation. Later, it becomes relevant whether a specific customer problem has been confirmed, a decision prepared, and an economically sensible next step agreed upon.

At the results level, factors such as realized contribution margins, additional processing costs, closing time, and the quality of the acquired customer relationship are important. A high nominal pipeline value, on the other hand, is not very meaningful if projects become obsolete, probabilities are set too optimistically, or the same opportunity is recorded multiple times. Even a conversation with a high-ranking person, in itself, does not possess any reliable economic value.

It is also important to distinguish between identified and actually generated demand. A supplier can identify a project that was already planned early on and thereby improve its competitive position. This is valuable, but different from the creation of the project itself. Therefore, a sound method for measuring success differentiates between detection, influencing, preparation, and acquisition. In this way, the pipeline becomes not a tool for self-affirmation, but a working model with verifiable assumptions.

Budgets need an economic logic

The pressure to achieve visible efficiency is real. In a 2,025 survey of 402 marketing managers, average marketing budgets amounted to 7.7 percent of company revenue. Paid media accounted for 30.6 percent of these budgets. The sample consisted primarily of large companies with annual revenues exceeding one billion US dollars and encompassed various industries. Therefore, these figures are neither a purely B2B benchmark nor a suitable budget guideline for medium-sized businesses.

Especially under budget pressure, it seems attractive to continuously optimize established channels technically. However, a better click-through rate doesn't solve a problem with target audience selection, and a low cost per contact doesn't compensate for a lack of demand. Before companies invest additional resources in automation or reach, they should examine where their growth process is actually limited: by brand awareness, information quality, relevant conversations, internal customer agreement, or implementation capacity.

This does not imply a universally applicable division between branding, campaigns, and signaling. A new provider with low brand awareness requires different investments than an established specialist with an overloaded sales force. A standardized product demands different support than a large, customized project. The crucial point is to align resources with the specific bottleneck and regularly evaluate their effectiveness, rather than adopting a trendy ratio as a one-size-fits-all solution.

A renovation in ninety days

An organizational entry can be structured as a limited pilot project lasting ninety days. This timeframe is a framework, not an empirically proven recipe for success. During the first month, a clearly defined customer segment, suitable needs, and common terminology are established. Marketing and sales review existing data, differentiate between contact opportunities and sales opportunities, and define which information is actually required for a handover.

In the second month, ongoing monitoring begins. A small, expert team evaluates leads and documents facts, hypotheses, counterarguments, and potential next steps. Simultaneously, information gaps are filled and relevant technical content is provided. Sales provides timely feedback without having to immediately treat every early lead as a project. The number of cases handled is deliberately adjusted to the available capacity.

In the third month, not only contacts but also decision quality and effort are evaluated. Which types of signals were useful? Where were incorrect assumptions made? What information was repeatedly missing? With long investment cycles, no reliable statement about the long-term revenue impact can be expected after ninety days. However, it is possible to examine whether the organization is conducting more relevant conversations, using resources more effectively, and making more informed distinctions between action, observation, and rejection.

Market knowledge as a lasting corporate asset

The long-term value of signal-oriented marketing also lies in an asset that is rarely visible in campaign reports: systematically built market knowledge. When a company transparently documents which changes can trigger which needs, who is involved at customer sites, and why previous approaches worked or failed, a reusable basis for decision-making is created. Individual employees remain important, but their knowledge is less likely to disappear when they change jobs.

To achieve this, the organization must also change its recognition mechanisms. A well-discarded opportunity can be more valuable than an additional, unusable contact. A technical expert who identifies a need early contributes to market development just as much as the team behind a successful campaign. Therefore, evaluations and career paths should not only reward visible achievements, but also the quality of insights, collaboration, and economically sound decisions.

The central leadership question thus shifts. The starting point is no longer the number of published measures, but rather the question of what relevant change in the customer market has been understood and what responsible action follows from it. Campaigns retain their place, but lose their role as an end in themselves. Marketing does not become less creative as a result, but more demanding: it must combine communication, market knowledge, and business responsibility.

📈🚀 From visibility to trust 👀🤝 Your scalable path with Xpert.Digital

From visibility to trust: Your scalable path with Xpert.Digital - Image: Xpert.Digital

In industrial B2B, sustainable business relationships rarely emerge overnight. They develop step by step – through visibility, professional relevance, recurring touchpoints, and growing trust. Xpert.Digital's 4-stage model addresses precisely this: It offers a structured path that begins with a manageable entry point and can evolve into deeper collaboration in business development if needed.

Instead of relying on loud marketing promises, this model puts the relationship at the forefront. Companies start with clearly defined, easily calculable measures and then decide, based on their own experience, how far they want to expand the collaboration. A key factor for this undisturbed trust-building process: The platform completely avoids annoying advertising ads, so the editorial focus remains solely on the companies' expertise.