Opinion survey in Canada: Almost every second Canadian prefers 28th EU member than 51st US state (10%)

Canada's Hypothetical EU Membership: A Comprehensive Analysis

A recent survey conducted by Abacus Data has revealed a surprising finding: a significant portion of the Canadian population is favorably disposed toward the idea of ​​their country joining the European Union. Nearly half of those surveyed expressed support for the proposal, while a quarter remained undecided. Only a small minority opposed such membership. This result is remarkable because support for Canada's EU accession even surpasses support for the UK's rejoining the EU. This unexpected preference raises significant questions regarding Canada's future strategic direction and the potential enlargement of the European Union.

A spokesperson for the European Commission, Paula Pinho, commented on the survey results, calling them an honor and a sign of the European Union's attractiveness. At the same time, however, she pointed out that any potential Canadian membership would have to comply with the criteria laid down in the EU treaties. In particular, the requirement of being a "European state" is a key issue in this debate.

This report therefore undertakes an in-depth examination of the various dimensions of potential Canadian EU membership. It sheds light on the legal framework and historical precedents, as well as analyzing the possible economic and political implications. Furthermore, it discusses public opinion in Canada and the geopolitical consequences of such a decision.

Suitable for:

• Economic perspectives for Canada and expansion strategies to Europe: Germany as a strategic EU headquarters

The criteria for EU membership: The focus is on the concept of the “European state”.

The legal basis for membership in the European Union is Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). This article stipulates that any European state that respects the values ​​mentioned in Article 2 and commits to promoting them may apply for membership of the Union. Article 2 itself defines the fundamental values ​​of the EU, which include respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. These values ​​form the foundation of the European Union and are indispensable prerequisites for any membership.

Beyond the condition of a "European state" mentioned in the Treaty on European Union, there are more detailed criteria for EU membership, the so-called Copenhagen criteria. These were agreed at the Copenhagen Summit in June 1993 and can be divided into three main areas: political, economic, and administrative criteria.

The political criterion requires an accession candidate to have stable institutions that guarantee democracy, the rule of law, human rights, and respect for and protection of minorities. This includes, among other things, free and fair elections, an independent judiciary, respect for freedom of expression, and the protection of minority rights. A functioning democratic system and adherence to fundamental human rights are essential for EU membership.

The economic criterion requires a functioning market economy and the ability to withstand competitive pressure and market forces within the Union. This means that the candidate country's economy must be able to integrate into the EU single market and compete economically with other member states. This includes, among other things, a stable macroeconomic situation, effective competition, and a sufficiently developed private sector.

Finally, the administrative criterion includes the ability to assume the obligations of EU membership and to effectively implement and apply all EU law, the so-called acquis communautaire. The acquis communautaire comprises the entire body of EU law, consisting of treaties, regulations, directives, decisions, and the case law of the European Court of Justice. An accession candidate must be able to integrate this extensive body of law into its national legislation and apply it effectively. This requires an efficient public administration and judiciary.

While the Copenhagen criteria formulate detailed requirements for potential member states, the condition of being a "European state" mentioned in the TEU remains deliberately vague. The EU treaties do not explicitly define what constitutes a European state. This ambiguity grants the European Commission and the current member states considerable leeway in interpreting this requirement. The question of what "European" means in the context of EU membership is therefore not purely geographical or technical, but also politically and culturally defined.

The European Commission plays a central role in the enlargement process. It assesses an applicant's ability to meet the criteria and makes a recommendation to the Council of the European Union. The Council then decides unanimously whether to grant a country candidate status and open formal accession negotiations. This unanimous agreement in the Council underscores the political nature of the enlargement process and the need for all member states to agree to any enlargement.

The interpretation of “European state” and historical precedents

In the past, the European Union has tended to apply a broad interpretation of the term "European country" with regard to membership practice. This flexible interpretation is evident in various historical cases that illustrate the complexity and political nature of the question of "European identity".

A notable example of this is Cyprus's accession in 2004. Geographically located in West Asia, Cyprus was deemed eligible for membership due to its cultural and political ties to Europe. This decision illustrates that geographical location is not the sole criterion for assessing a state's "European" identity. Cyprus's historical and cultural relations with Europe, particularly with Greece and European culture in general, played a crucial role in the positive evaluation of its application. Interestingly, the entire island territory of Cyprus is considered EU territory, including the northern part where EU law is currently suspended due to the political situation. This underscores the political dimension of EU enlargement and the EU's willingness to find pragmatic solutions even to complex territorial issues.

Another example is Turkey, whose territory lies mostly in Asia, but which has long been an official EU candidate country, although negotiations are currently frozen. Turkey's historical and political ties to Europe, particularly its role in the Ottoman Empire and its long history of relations with European states, were considered sufficient to grant it candidate status. Turkey is a member of NATO and has traditionally maintained close ties with Western states. Nevertheless, accession negotiations have stalled due to concerns regarding the rule of law, human rights, and democracy in Turkey. The case of Turkey demonstrates that historical ties alone are not enough; adherence to the EU's fundamental values ​​and criteria is also crucial.

In contrast, Morocco's application to join the European Communities was rejected in 1987 on the grounds that Morocco could not be considered a "European country." While Morocco is geographically located in North Africa and does have historical and cultural ties to Europe, particularly Spain and France, its rejection illustrates that not all countries with certain historical or cultural connections to Europe are automatically eligible for membership. The geographical distance and Morocco's distinct cultural and political development likely played a role in this decision.

The EU also includes so-called "outermost regions," which lie geographically outside Europe, such as French Guiana in South America and various islands in the Caribbean and the Indian Ocean. These territories are integral parts of EU member states like France, Spain, and Portugal and are subject to EU law. Their existence within the EU underpins the flexible geographical interpretation of the European area within the EU. These regions benefit from the EU membership of their parent countries and are integrated into the EU single market.

Greenland, although part of the Kingdom of Denmark, is an overseas territory associated with the EU, but not a member state. Greenland joined the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1973 along with Denmark, but voted to leave in a referendum in 1982. In 1985, Greenland left the EEC and was granted the status of an associated overseas territory. This case demonstrates that differing positions on EU membership can exist even within European states and that the EU offers flexible association models.

Furthermore, the EU has concluded various association agreements with non-European countries, which provide for varying degrees of integration and cooperation. These agreements offer frameworks for cooperation in areas such as trade, political dialogue, and research, but do not grant membership. Examples include agreements with countries in the Western Balkans, North Africa, and the Middle East. These agreements aim to strengthen relations with neighboring regions and promote stability and prosperity.

The EU's previous decisions on membership and association agreements point to a pragmatic approach, in which cultural, historical, and political ties to Europe can outweigh purely geographical considerations. The case of Cyprus is particularly relevant to the debate surrounding Canada and suggests that shared values ​​and historical connections could be used to argue for "European" status. However, the rejection of Morocco demonstrates that a sound justification is required and that geographical distance and cultural differences can also play a role. EU enlargement policy is thus a dynamic process that takes into account legal, political, and cultural aspects.

Suitable for:

• Europe and Germany for international companies: a comprehensive analysis of the market potential

Potential economic impacts of Canada joining the EU

Canada's accession to the EU would bring about profound economic changes for both Canada and the European Union. For Canada, full membership would mean unrestricted access to the EU's vast single market, which holds enormous economic potential. The EU single market is one of the world's largest economic areas and offers Canadian companies access to over 450 million consumers. This access could significantly boost trade and investment between Canada and the EU.

The EU's nominal gross domestic product (GDP) is projected to exceed US$20 trillion by 2025. This immense economic power underscores the attractiveness of the EU single market for Canada. The existing Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the EU has already led to a significant increase in bilateral trade. CETA has reduced tariffs and other trade barriers between Canada and the EU, facilitating trade in many sectors. Full membership could further enhance these positive effects by removing remaining barriers and streamlining regulations. Eliminating non-tariff barriers and harmonizing standards could further facilitate trade and investment.

Furthermore, EU membership could reduce Canada's economic dependence on the United States, its largest trading partner. Canada is deeply integrated into the North American economy and heavily reliant on trade with the US. Diversifying its trading partners through EU membership could increase Canada's economic resilience and make it less vulnerable to economic fluctuations in the US. EU membership could offer Canada a strategic alternative to the North American economic area.

Although Canada, as a relatively wealthy country, would likely be a net contributor to the EU budget, it could potentially benefit from certain EU funding programs. The EU budget finances a wide range of programs in areas such as research and development, regional development, infrastructure, and education. Canadian companies and institutions could potentially participate in these programs and benefit from EU funding. However, Canada's net contributor status to the EU budget would be an important political factor in the public debate.

However, Canada would also face significant economic challenges. It would have to adopt and implement the extensive acquis communautaire, which would require substantial adjustments to its legal and regulatory framework. This affects areas such as social rights, environmental regulations (e.g., REACH), and economic rules. Adapting to EU standards in these areas could be costly and time-consuming for some Canadian industries. REACH, for example, the EU chemicals regulation, is a complex set of rules that could require significant adjustments for chemical companies.

Canada may have to replace its supply-side agricultural management system with the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which could have significant implications for the agricultural sector. The CAP is a central component of EU policy and subsidizes agriculture in EU member states. The transition from Canadian supply-side management to the CAP could bring about profound changes for Canadian farmers and the agricultural industry. Some sectors might benefit from EU subsidies, while others would face new competitive landscapes.

Participation in the EU Emissions Trading System would likely also be required. The EU Emissions Trading System is a cornerstone of EU climate policy and obliges companies to pay for their CO2 emissions. Participation in the EU Emissions Trading System could impose additional costs for some Canadian industries and require efforts to reduce emissions.

Furthermore, Canada would have to apply EU tariffs to third countries, including the US, which could disrupt existing trade relationships. The EU has a common trade policy and levies tariffs on imports from non-EU countries. Adopting EU tariffs could alter Canada's trade relations with the US and other key trading partners, potentially leading to trade disputes. Renegotiating trade agreements would likely be necessary.

EU membership also includes the free movement of people, which could lead to increased immigration from the EU to Canada and vice versa. The free movement of workers and citizens is a fundamental principle of the EU. Canada's EU membership would allow EU citizens to live and work in Canada without a visa, and vice versa. This could lead to an increase in migration between Canada and the EU, which could bring both economic opportunities and social challenges.

In the long term, Canada could be expected to adopt the euro as its currency. The eurozone is the EU's monetary union and currently comprises 20 member states. Adopting the euro would be a significant step for Canada and would profoundly change the country's monetary policy and financial markets. However, euro adoption is a long-term process and requires the fulfillment of certain economic convergence criteria.

Canada's likely net contribution to the EU budget could cause domestic discontent. As a wealthy country, Canada would probably pay more into the EU budget than it receives in return. This net contributor position could lead to criticism and resistance from the Canadian public and political sphere, particularly in regions that might feel disadvantaged.

For the EU, Canada's accession would significantly increase its global economic strength, as Canada has a large and developed economy. The integration of the Canadian economy into the EU single market would strengthen the EU's economic growth and competitiveness. Canada is one of the world's largest economies and boasts a highly developed industrial and service sector.

Access to Canada's abundant natural resources, including critical minerals and energy, would be beneficial for the EU. Canada possesses significant reserves of raw materials such as oil, gas, minerals, and timber. Access to these resources could strengthen the EU's energy security and raw material base, particularly in times of geopolitical uncertainty. Critical minerals are of great importance for the green and digital transformation.

Extending the Single Market to include Canada would further expand the EU's trade network and potential. Canada's integration into the EU Single Market would further boost trade within the EU and between the EU and Canada. The EU would become an even more attractive trading partner for third countries.

However, integrating such a geographically distant economy could present logistical and regulatory challenges. The geographical distance between Canada and Europe could increase the cost of trade and logistics and complicate coordination. The differing regulatory frameworks and legal systems could also pose integration challenges.

Furthermore, the accession of a large, non-European economy could lead to new internal dynamics and potential disagreements between member states. As a large and influential member state, Canada would alter the balance of power within the EU and potentially create new alliances and fault lines between member states. Canada's differing interests and priorities could lead to new tensions within the EU.

Comparison of key economic indicators (estimates for 2025)

In 2025, a comparison of key economic indicators reveals significant differences between the European Union (EU27) and Canada. In terms of nominal gross domestic product (GDP), the EU, at approximately USD 20.29 trillion, is considerably higher than Canada, whose GDP is around USD 2.33 trillion. Purchasing power parity (PPP) adjusted GDP also shows a significantly higher economic output for the EU, at approximately USD 29.01 trillion, compared to Canada's approximately USD 2.69 trillion. GDP per capita presents a more nuanced picture: Canada's nominal GDP of approximately USD 55,890 is higher than the EU's of approximately USD 43,194. However, PPP-adjusted GDP per capita is nearly identical, at approximately USD 64,680 in the EU and around USD 64,570 in Canada.

The unemployment rate is comparable in both economic regions. The EU had a rate of approximately 5.8% in January 2025, while Canada's rate was around 6.5% in September 2024. Both regions have similar economic structures, heavily influenced by services and industry. Furthermore, the resources sector plays a significant role in Canada.

Xpert.Digital has in-depth knowledge of various industries. This allows us to develop tailor-made strategies that are tailored precisely to the requirements and challenges of your specific market segment. By continually analyzing market trends and following industry developments, we can act with foresight and offer innovative solutions. Through the combination of experience and knowledge, we generate added value and give our customers a decisive competitive advantage.

More about it here:

• Use the 5x expertise of Xpert.Digital in one package - starting at just €500/month

Comparison of political and social systems

Canada is a parliamentary democracy and a federal state with a constitutional monarchy. The Canadian political system is characterized by a separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Power is divided between the federal government and ten provinces and three territories. This federalism shapes Canadian politics and society and leads to a complex distribution of power between the different levels of government. Canada follows the Westminster parliamentary model, which is characterized by a bicameral parliament and a strong executive branch headed by the prime minister.

The European Union, on the other hand, is a supranational political and economic union of 27 member states. It represents a unique form of cooperation between nation-states, combining elements of a federal state and a confederation. The EU has a multi-level governance system in which power is shared between the member states and the EU institutions. This complex system of power-sharing is a key characteristic of the EU and distinguishes it from traditional nation-states.

The most important institutions of the EU include the European Commission (executive body), the Council of the European Union (representing the governments of the member states), and the European Parliament (directly elected). The European Commission is the EU's executive body and is responsible for implementing EU policies and monitoring compliance with EU law. The Council of the European Union is the EU's main decision-making body and is composed of the ministers of the member states. The European Parliament is the directly elected body of the EU and represents the citizens of the EU. Together, these institutions form the EU's institutional framework and shape EU policy.

Both Canada and the EU are characterized by diversity and internal conflicts. Both are multi-level systems that have undergone constitutional or treaty reforms. Canada has experienced several constitutional reforms throughout its history, strengthening federalism and provincial rights. The EU, too, has undergone several treaty reforms throughout its history, altering the EU's competences and the functioning of its institutions. Both strive to embrace differences and diversity. Canada is a multicultural country with a diverse population comprised of various ethnic and cultural groups. The EU, too, is characterized by a great diversity of cultures, languages, and traditions.

Canada has long been regarded as a kindred spirit and an honorary member of the European nations in many political and diplomatic matters. Canada shares many values ​​and interests with EU member states and collaborates closely with the EU in numerous international organizations. This close relationship between Canada and the EU is based on shared values ​​and a long history of cooperation.

One difference lies in the fact that the EU is more centralized in certain policy areas than Canada's increasingly decentralized federalism. The EU has extensive powers in areas such as trade, competition, and environmental policy and can enact binding legislation that applies directly in member states. Canada, on the other hand, is a federal state where the provinces enjoy considerable autonomy in many policy areas. This difference in centralization could necessitate adjustments for Canada upon EU membership.

The Canadian legal system is primarily based on common law (with the exception of Quebec, which has a civil law system), while in most EU countries, the civil law tradition prevails. Common law is a legal system based on case law and precedents, whereas civil law is based on codified statutes and laws. This difference in legal systems may necessitate adjustments for Canada when integrating into the EU legal framework. However, federal law in Canada is considered a mixed system, combining elements of both common law and civil law.

For Canada, this would entail potential adjustments. It would have to accept that in certain areas, decisions of the European Court of Justice would take precedence over those of the Supreme Court of Canada. The primacy of EU law over national law is a fundamental principle of the EU. Canada's EU membership would mean that the European Court of Justice would be the highest court of appeal in certain areas, and its decisions would take precedence over those of the Supreme Court of Canada. This would represent a significant loss of sovereignty for Canada.

Canada would need to align its social policies with EU standards, which would potentially include regulations on working hours, environmental protection, and consumer protection. The EU has set high standards in many areas of social policy, environmental protection, and consumer protection. Canada would need to align its national standards with these EU standards, which could result in adjustment costs in some areas.

Furthermore, Canada would need to integrate into the EU's institutional framework, sending commissioners to the European Commission and electing members to the European Parliament. Canada would need to actively participate in the work of the EU institutions and represent its interests in Brussels. Sending commissioners to the European Commission and electing members to the European Parliament would be essential steps toward integration into the EU framework.

Although Canada and the EU share the core values ​​of democracy and multilateralism, their governance structures and legal systems differ significantly. Canada would need to make substantial political and legal adjustments to fully integrate into the EU framework, particularly regarding the primacy of EU law and participation in EU institutions. These adjustments would require considerable political will and societal consensus in Canada.

Canadian Perspectives: Public and Political Opinion

Public opinion in Canada shows a considerable degree of support for the idea of ​​exploring EU membership. The aforementioned Abacus Data survey from March 2025 found that 46% of Canadians favored joining the EU, while 29% were opposed and 25% were undecided. These figures indicate significant interest in EU membership among the Canadian population.

Younger Canadians (18-29 years old) show the strongest support for EU membership. This could indicate that younger generations are more open to international cooperation and new policy options. Support for EU membership appears to be more pronounced among younger Canadians than among older generations.

Voters of the Liberal Party tend to be more supportive, while voters of the Conservative Party are more often opposed. Political party affiliation plays a role in attitudes toward EU membership. Liberal voters, who are traditionally internationalist in their orientation, show more support, while conservative voters tend to be more skeptical of supranational organizations.

Canadians generally have a positive view of the EU (68%). The positive image of the EU in Canada could be a factor in support for EU membership. The EU is often perceived in Canada as an area of ​​democracy, human rights, and economic prosperity.

Many believe that joining the EU would improve trade and the economic situation in Canada. Economic motives play a significant role in supporting EU membership. Many Canadians see EU membership as an opportunity to diversify trade and reduce economic dependence on the United States.

The idea of ​​EU membership gained traction due to concerns about the reliability of the US as a trading partner under President Trump. The Trump administration's protectionist trade policies and the uncertainty in US-Canadian relations may have increased the EU's appeal as an alternative trading partner for Canada. The EU is perceived as a stable and reliable partner.

The positions of political parties in Canada differ. Voters of the Liberal Party show stronger support for EU membership. The Liberal Party, under the new Prime Minister Carney, has expressed a positive view of the EU in the past and emphasized the importance of closer ties with Europe. The Liberals may see EU membership as a way to strengthen Canada's international role and diversify its economic relationships.

Conservative voters are more likely to oppose EU membership. Historically, their focus has been on trade agreements, but they may be skeptical of broader political integration. Conservatives may have concerns about the loss of sovereignty and the costs of EU membership. They may also prioritize maintaining traditionally close ties with the United States.

The NDP has historically been reserved towards EU trade agreements such as CETA, particularly regarding investor protection provisions. Its stance on full membership is less clear, but likely cautious. The NDP may have concerns about the social and environmental impacts of EU membership and prioritize the interests of workers and environmental protection.

The Bloc Québécois focuses primarily on the interests and sovereignty of Quebec. EU membership could be seen either as a strengthening of Quebec's Francophone identity within a larger bloc or as another layer of federalism to be addressed. The Bloc Québécois's stance on EU membership could depend on how it would affect Quebec's specific interests, particularly the promotion of the French language and culture.

The European Movement International is exploring the establishment of a Canadian office to foster closer ties and supports the goal of EU membership should the Canadian people and government desire it. The European Movement International is an organization that advocates for European integration. Its support for a Canadian office and the idea of ​​EU membership demonstrates that there is interest in Europe in a closer relationship with Canada.

Public opinion in Canada shows considerable interest in considering EU membership, possibly driven by concerns about relations with the United States. However, this support is not uniform across age groups or political affiliations. Positions within Canadian political parties vary, suggesting that EU membership could become a contentious political issue. Extensive public debate and clear political leadership would be necessary to further explore the question of EU membership in Canada.

Suitable for:

• Battery storage and automobile: The punitive tariffs of US President Donald Trump against Mexico and Canada also meet Germany

Geopolitical consequences of Canada joining the EU

Canada's accession to the EU would likely have significant repercussions on the geopolitical landscape, particularly on relations between Canada and the United States, Canada's closest ally and largest trading partner. The US and Canada have a long history of close political, economic, and military cooperation. EU membership for Canada could fundamentally alter these traditionally close ties.

In the area of ​​trade, Canada would have to adopt the EU's trade policy, which could potentially lead to higher trade barriers with the US and necessitate the renegotiation of agreements such as USMCA. The EU has a common trade policy and imposes tariffs on imports from non-EU countries. Canada's adoption of the EU's trade policy could lead to trade conflicts with the US and weaken the North American Free Trade Agreement. Renegotiating USMCA, the successor to NAFTA, would likely be required.

In defense, Canada's priorities could become more closely aligned with European defense strategies, potentially impacting coordination with the US on North American security issues. The EU has strengthened its defense policy in recent years and is seeking greater autonomy in security matters. EU membership for Canada could lead it to align more closely with the European defense agenda and less with North American defense cooperation with the US. This could negatively affect military cooperation between Canada and the US.

In diplomacy, Canada's foreign policy positions on global issues could align more closely with those of the EU, potentially leading to differences with the US. The EU has a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and adopts a common position on many international issues. EU membership for Canada could result in Canada more strongly adhering to EU positions and less so to US positions in international politics. This could lead to disagreements with the US on key foreign policy issues.

Alignment with EU immigration policy could complicate border security agreements between the US and Canada. The EU has a common immigration policy and aims to harmonize asylum procedures and border controls. Canada's EU membership could lead to Canada aligning its immigration policy with EU standards, which could affect border security and cooperation with the US on immigration issues.

Canada is a founding member of NATO. Many EU member states are also part of NATO. EU membership for Canada would mean membership in both organizations, potentially improving interoperability but also creating tensions should the US remain skeptical of NATO. NATO is the West's primary defense alliance and plays a central role in European security. While EU membership within NATO could strengthen transatlantic relations, it could also lead to tensions if the US views EU defense efforts critically.

Relations with other global actors could also change. Canada's relationship with China could be influenced by the EU's approach to China, which in some areas is more cautious than Canada's current stance. The EU has a differentiated China strategy that emphasizes both cooperation and competition, as well as systemic rivalry. EU membership for Canada could lead to a more cautious approach to China, one that aligns more closely with the EU's China strategy.

Canada's close relationship with the United Kingdom may need to be reconciled with its new obligations as an EU member. The UK is no longer an EU member following Brexit, but Canada and the UK maintain close historical and cultural ties. Canada's EU membership could lead to a realignment of its relationship with the UK in line with its EU commitments.

Canada possesses significant Arctic territory and a well-developed Arctic policy. The EU is also showing increasing interest in the Arctic. EU membership for Canada could lead to closer cooperation on Arctic issues, but might also require alignment with EU environmental and resource management policies in the region. The Arctic is a region of strategic importance and growing geopolitical interest. EU membership for Canada could strengthen cooperation between Canada and the EU in the Arctic and influence EU Arctic policy.

Canada's accession to the EU would be a significant geopolitical event, fundamentally altering its relationship with the United States and potentially shifting the balance of power in North America. While it could strengthen Canada's ties with Europe and provide a counterweight to US influence, it would also necessitate careful navigation of existing alliances and relationships with other global actors. The geopolitical implications of Canadian EU membership would be far-reaching and would impact the international order.

At a time when a company's digital presence determines its success, the challenge is how to make this presence authentic, individual and far-reaching. Xpert.Digital offers an innovative solution that positions itself as an intersection between an industry hub, a blog and a brand ambassador. It combines the advantages of communication and sales channels in a single platform and enables publication in 18 different languages. The cooperation with partner portals and the possibility of publishing articles on Google News and a press distribution list with around 8,000 journalists and readers maximize the reach and visibility of the content. This represents an essential factor in external sales & marketing (SMarketing).

More about it here:

• Authentic. Individually. Global: The Xpert.Digital strategy for your company

Position of the EU institutions and member states

Although European Commission spokesperson Paula Pinho described the survey results as "honorable," she emphasized that, according to Article 49 of the TEU, only European states can apply for membership. This initial reaction from the European Commission was cautious, highlighting the legal challenge posed by Canada's geographical location. The Commission pointed out that the EU treaties include a geographical restriction on membership.

The definition of the term "European state" is not explicitly established in the treaties. This ambiguity in the definition opens up room for interpretation and leaves space for political debate. The question of what constitutes a "European state" is not purely geographical, but also political and cultural.

The Secretariat of the European Parliament suggests that any country with cultural or political ties to Europe can submit an application. This interpretation by the European Parliament is broader and emphasizes the importance of cultural and political links for the question of EU membership. The Parliament could be more open to a creative interpretation of the term "European state".

Several prominent European figures have expressed support. Former German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel proposed admitting Canada to the EU, emphasizing the need for new allies in light of potential US isolationism. Gabriel argued that, given the political uncertainties in the US and the rise of China, the EU needs new partners and allies, and Canada is a natural candidate. His proposal suggests a strategic interest in expanding the EU beyond its traditional geographical boundaries.

Former Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt also spoke in favor of Canadian membership. Verhofstadt is a well-known advocate of European integration and has previously championed an ambitious EU enlargement policy. His support for Canadian membership underscores the idea of ​​a global role for the EU and its willingness to transcend traditional geographical boundaries.

French President Macron, during a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Carney, emphasized the importance of fair trade and international rules, suggesting a possible openness to closer relations. Macron's remarks indicate France's interest in strengthening ties with Canada and its potential support for closer integration with the EU. France is an influential EU member state, and its position plays a significant role in EU enlargement policy.

It should be noted, however, that accession requires the unanimous consent of all 27 member states. Unanimity in the Council means that any member state can veto an accession application. This makes the enlargement process politically complex and requires broad consensus among the member states.

Some member states may have concerns regarding agriculture, trade competition, or geopolitical implications. Member states with strong agricultural sectors may be concerned about competition from Canadian agricultural products. Other member states may have concerns about the economic and geopolitical consequences of membership so far away. The differing interests and priorities of member states could lead to opposition to Canadian membership.

Although some European figures have signaled support, the official position of the EU institutions, particularly the Commission, points to the significant legal challenge posed by Canada's geographical location outside of Europe. The Commission emphasizes the importance of the EU Treaties and the need to meet the legal criteria for membership. However, the lack of a strict definition of a "European state" leaves room for political maneuvering and potential treaty changes, although this would require the unanimous consent of all member states, which could be difficult to achieve. A treaty change would be a lengthy and politically demanding process.

Suitable for:

• Europe's way to technological sovereignty through AI-based automation: An analysis of the Kiro 2024 recommendations

The accession process for Canada

Canada would have to submit a formal application for membership to the Council of the EU. This formal application is the first step in the accession process and signals Canada's official desire to join. The application would have to be addressed to the Council of the EU, the EU's main decision-making body.

The Council would then ask the European Commission to assess Canada's ability to meet the accession criteria and issue an opinion. The Commission plays a central role in the accession process and is responsible for assessing the candidate countries' eligibility for membership. The Commission's opinion is a key basis for the Council's decision on granting candidate status.

If the Commission's opinion is positive and all EU member states agree, Canada would be granted candidate status by the European Council. The European Council is composed of the heads of state or government of the EU member states and is the EU's highest political body. Granting candidate status is an important political step and signals the EU's fundamental willingness to open accession negotiations with Canada.

Canada would need to develop a pre-accession strategy with the Commission that includes reforms to align with EU law. The pre-accession strategy prepares the candidate country for EU membership and encompasses reforms in various areas to facilitate alignment with the acquis communautaire. The Commission will support the candidate country in implementing these reforms.

Formal accession negotiations would then commence, covering various chapters of EU law (the acquis). Accession negotiations are a lengthy and complex process in which the candidate country and the EU negotiate the terms of accession and examine the alignment of national law with the acquis communautaire. The negotiations are divided into different chapters, each covering a different EU policy area.

This process involves a detailed review of Canadian laws and administrative capacities and can take many years. The detailed review of Canadian laws and administrative capacities is an essential part of the accession negotiations and serves to ensure that Canada is able to meet the obligations of EU membership. The accession process can take many years because it requires extensive reforms and negotiations.

The Commission and Canada will examine their respective laws to identify any differences. Comparative legal analysis is a key component of the accession negotiations and serves to identify areas where Canadian law needs to be aligned with EU law. The Commission and Canada are working together to address these differences.

The EU Council would set opening and closing benchmarks for each negotiating chapter. Benchmarks are measurable criteria that the candidate country must meet to make progress in the accession negotiations. The EU Council sets these benchmarks for each negotiating chapter and monitors the candidate country's progress in meeting them.

Once negotiations are concluded and all member states are satisfied, an accession treaty would be signed, setting out the conditions of membership. The accession treaty is the legal document that establishes the terms of the candidate country's EU membership. The treaty must be signed by all EU member states and the candidate country.

This treaty would need to be ratified by all EU member states, the European Parliament, and Canada in accordance with their respective constitutional provisions. Ratification of the accession treaty is a necessary step to make accession legally valid. Different ratification procedures are required in the EU member states and in Canada, which generally include the approval of national parliaments and, in some cases, referendums.

Canada would then officially become an EU member on the date stipulated in the treaty. Official accession is the final step in the accession process and marks the beginning of Canada's EU membership. From this date, Canada is a full member of the EU and subject to EU law.

The entire process typically takes many years (an average of about nine years for current member states). The accession process is a lengthy and demanding process that requires significant political and administrative resources. The average duration of the accession process for current member states is approximately nine years, but this can vary depending on the complexity of the case.

The accession process for Canada would be complex and lengthy, even if the initial legal hurdle of "European state" status were overcome. It would require significant political will and sustained efforts from both Canada and the EU, including extensive legal and regulatory reforms and the unanimous consent of all existing member states at every stage. Overcoming the legal, political, and technical challenges of the accession process would demand an extraordinary political and administrative effort.

Feasibility and impact of Canadian EU membership

The analysis of Canada's potential EU membership paints a complex picture. Although there is growing support for such an idea among the Canadian population, the path to actual membership is fraught with significant legal, political, and economic difficulties. While the idea of ​​Canadian EU membership is present in public debate, its implementation faces considerable challenges.

The fundamental question of Canada's eligibility as a "European state" under Article 49 of the TEU presents the first major hurdle. Canada's geographical location outside Europe is a significant argument against its automatic classification as a "European state" within the meaning of the EU Treaties. While the EU has historically demonstrated a flexible interpretation of this term, particularly in the case of Cyprus, and cultural and political ties play a role, Canada's geographical distance is a substantial argument against its classification as a European state. Canada's geographical distance from Europe is a significant difference compared to previous enlargement cases and poses a particular challenge.

Overcoming this hurdle might require a political decision or even an amendment to the EU treaties, which would necessitate the unanimous consent of all current member states. Overcoming the geographical hurdle would require a political consensus within the EU, potentially involving a creative interpretation of the term "European state" or even a formal treaty amendment. However, a treaty amendment would be a lengthy and politically demanding process requiring the consent of all member states.

Even if the legal question were answered in the affirmative, Canada would face a lengthy and demanding accession process. This process would require extensive negotiations, reforms, and adjustments in both Canada and the EU. Adopting and implementing the extensive acquis communautaire would necessitate profound reforms to the Canadian legal and regulatory framework. Aligning with EU standards in many areas would pose a significant challenge for Canada.

Economic adjustments, particularly in agriculture and trade with the US, would also be significant. The conversion of Canadian agriculture to the CAP and the adoption of EU trade policy would bring about substantial economic changes for Canada. The impact on trade with the US would also need to be carefully examined.

For the EU, Canada's accession would represent a significant economic and geopolitical strengthening, but integrating such a distant economy, so closely intertwined with another actor, also presents challenges. The EU would benefit from Canada's economic strength and natural resources, but would also face the logistical and regulatory challenges of such a geographically dispersed membership. Furthermore, integrating an economy so closely tied to the US could generate new internal dynamics within the EU.

While public opinion in Canada shows a surprising level of support, it is not uniform. Support for EU membership is not homogeneous among the Canadian population and varies according to age group and political orientation. The positions of political parties suggest that EU membership could be a polarizing issue in Canada. The political debate on EU membership in Canada could be contentious.

On a geopolitical level, Canada's accession to the EU would fundamentally alter its relationship with the United States, its most important partner, and redefine Canada's role in international alliances. EU membership would strain Canada's traditionally close ties with the United States and shift its geopolitical orientation toward Europe. Canada would have to redefine its role in NATO and other international organizations.

While EU membership for Canada cannot be entirely ruled out, the path to it would be fraught with considerable legal, political, and economic complexities. Achieving Canadian EU membership would be an ambitious and challenging project requiring significant effort and political change. The fundamental question of Canada's "European" identity presents the first major obstacle. The question of whether Canada can be considered a "European state" within the meaning of the EU treaties is the central sticking point of the debate.

Even if this obstacle were overcome, the lengthy accession process, which requires extensive reforms in Canada and the unanimous consent of all EU member states, suggests that full membership remains a distant and uncertain prospect. Even if the legal and political hurdles could be cleared, the accession process itself would take many years and require considerable resources. Securing the unanimous consent of all EU member states at every stage of the process is another major challenge.

The very fact that this discussion is taking place signals a potential shift in Canada's strategic thinking about its role in the world. The debate over Canadian EU membership, even if hypothetical, demonstrates that Canada is considering new strategic options and potentially redefining its international role. The question of EU membership could spark a broader discussion about Canada's future orientation in a changing world order.

☑️ SME support in strategy, consulting, planning and implementation

☑️ Creation or realignment of the digital strategy and digitalization

☑️ Expansion and optimization of international sales processes

☑️ Global & Digital B2B trading platforms

☑️ Pioneer Business Development

 

I would be happy to serve as your personal advisor.

You can contact me by filling out the contact form below or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) .

I'm looking forward to our joint project.

 

 

Xpert.Digital is a hub for industry with a focus on digitalization, mechanical engineering, logistics/intralogistics and photovoltaics.

With our 360° business development solution, we support well-known companies from new business to after sales.

Market intelligence, smarketing, marketing automation, content development, PR, mail campaigns, personalized social media and lead nurturing are part of our digital tools.

You can find out more at: www.xpert.digital - www.xpert.solar - www.xpert.plus