Published on: June 10, 2025 / update from: June 10, 2025 - Author: Konrad Wolfenstein
Difference between Visionos and Android XR: A comparison of the leading AR operating systems-Image: Xpert.digital
Closed against the open system: How Apple and Google tackle the mixed reality revolution differently
Visionos and Android XR in comparison: Two opposite philosophies for the computing of tomorrow
The development of spatial computer operating systems marks a decisive turning point in the technology industry. With Apple's Visionos and Google's Android XR, there are two fundamental approaches that embody different philosophies for the future of computing. While visionos is already available as a sophisticated platform for the Apple Vision Pro and focuses on a closed, highly integrated ecosystem, Android XR pursues an open, diverse strategy with strong AI integration by Gemini. The technical basics of both systems show remarkable parallels as well as fundamental differences in the user interaction, hardware compatibility and development approaches.
Suitable for:
Basic system architectures and philosophical approaches
Visionos represents Apple's introduction to spatial computing and is based on the proven foundations of iOS, iPados and MacOS. As the world's first consumer operating system that was developed entirely for spatial computing, Visionos uses a completely new, three-dimensional user interface that is controlled by eye and hand gestures and language input. The architecture enables real-time environmental acquisition through advanced environment mapping, precise hand and eye tracking for natural interactions as well as seamless integration of 2D and 3D applications. The system was specially developed for the Apple Vision Pro and embodies Apple's typical approach of a closed, highly integrated ecosystem.
Android XR, on the other hand, follows a fundamental approach and is designed as an open, uniform operating system for extended reality devices. The system based on the Android Open Source Platform (AOSP) was developed in cooperation with Samsung and combines years of investing in AI, AR and VR technologies. Android XR is intended for a variety of devices, including VR headsets, AR glasses and mixed reality devices, which is a clear difference to Apple's single-device focus. The system integrates Google's AI assistant Gemini from scratch and promises a more natural, dialog-oriented interaction with computers.
The different philosophies are already evident in the naming: While Apple prefers the term “spatial computing” and avoids terms such as “augmented reality” or “mixed reality”, Android XR explicitly includes the entire spectrum from AR to MR to VR. These differences reflect different visions for the future of computing: Apple focuses on a premium single device with perfected integration, while Google strives for an open ecosystem with a wide range of devices.
User interaction and interface design
The user interfaces of both systems show both similarities and significant differences in their approach to spatial interaction. Visionos introduces innovative concepts such as the “Infinite Canvas”, which enables users to place any number of apps and windows in the room. The system offers dynamic scaling, in which content can be continuously enlarged and reduced, as well as context -conscious behavior that recognizes the environment and adapts accordingly. The control is primarily via precise eye tracking in combination with subtle hand gestures, whereby users select elements by eye contact and confirm by merging index finger and thumb.
Android XR implements a similar gesture control system, but has technical differences. While in visionos the fingers for gestures do not necessarily have to be visible in the camera image, Android XR requires that the fingers stay in the field of vision of the cameras. A double tap on a sensor area on the headset edge enables the change to an AR mode that transfers the outside world through cameras to the internal displays. The interface is partly similar to that of visionos, but shows a stronger integration of Android-typical design elements and navigation patterns.
The continuous development of the interaction options is particularly noteworthy. Apple works on extended eye tracking functions for Visionos 3, including “Eye-Scrolling”, which should make it possible to scroll content solely by visual movements without additional hand gestures. This development shows Apple's focus on refining natural interactions. Android XR, on the other hand, increasingly relies on the integration of Google's Gemini-KI, which is intended to make language interactions more natural and context-related.
AI integration and assistance functions
The integration of artificial intelligence represents one of the most striking differences between the two platforms. Apple has introduced Visionos 2.4 Apple Intelligence, but this is shown as a subsequent integrated function with considerable restrictions. The AI features include writing tools for rewriting and summarizing texts, image generators for non-photo-based content, genemojis and smart response functions. Confusingly, Apple Intelligence remains limited to English on the Vision Pro, although other Apple devices have already received multilingual support.
Android XR, on the other hand, was developed from scratch for the “Gemini age” and integrates Google's advanced AI technologies as a core component. Gemini acts as an ubiquitous assistant who can see the world from a user perspective and offer contextual help. The system makes it possible to talk about what they have seen, ask questions and delegate tasks while the hands remain free. For Smart Glasses, Gemini offers functions such as real -time translation, navigation and the management of calendar entries without the smartphone having to be brought out.
The different AI approaches reflect the respective corporate philosophies: Apple focuses on data protection and local processing, while Google uses its cloud-based AI expertise and comprehensive data integration. These differences are particularly evident in multimodal interactions, where Android XR offers expanded options for natural language and context processing through Gemini 2.0.
Application ecosystem and developer support
The application ecosystem of both platforms shows different degrees of ripeness and strategies. Visionos can already use over 2,000 native apps and 1.5 million compatible iOS and iPad apps. Apple offers established development tools such as Xcode, Swiftui and Realitykit, whereby developers can fall back on familiar frameworks. The system supports various app types: traditional windows with Swiftui, 3D volumes for spatial content and spaces for immersive experiences. Visionos 2 introduced new APIs such as Volumetric APIs for simultaneous 3D apps and tabletop kit for spatial table interactions.
Android XR is still in the developer preview, but promises strong compatibility with existing Android apps. Developers can use proven tools such as Arcore, Android Studio, Jetpack Compose, Unity and OpenXR. The platform enables existing mobile and tablet apps to “function immediately”, with additional XR-specific content for 2025. The first developer reactions are positive, whereby the porting effort for unity-based VR apps is assessed as low, if switched to UNITY 6.
The developmental approaches differ in its openness: While Apple maintains a curative, quality-controlled ecosystem, Google relies on the proven Android strategy of open development and broad device support. This is also shown in the hardware partnerships: Apple develops exclusively for Vision Pro, while Android XR supports partners such as Samsung, Sony, Lynx and Xreal.
Hardware compatibility and variety of devices
A fundamental difference between the two platforms lies in your approach to hardware compatibility. Visionos is only developed and optimized for the Apple Vision Pro, which enables close integration between hardware and software. The system uses the M2 processor for complex spatial computing tasks such as eye and hand tracking as well as room acquisition. This exclusive hardware binding enables highly optimized performance, but limits the options for consumers.
Android XR follows the proven Android model of the diversity of hardware and supports various device categories from VR headsets to Smart Glasses. The first device will be Samsung's “Project Moohan”, which is scheduled to appear in 2025 and will be positioned as a direct competitor for vision per. The headset should be easier than the Pro vision and come with external battery packs of different capacities. Other partners such as Sony, Lynx and Xreal work on their own Android XR devices, which promises a wide range of products.
Android XR's support for Smart Glasses, which is developed as an independent device category, is particularly remarkable. These glasses work with the smartphone and offer optional in-lens displays for discrete information display. So far, Visionos has no comparable smart glass strategy, although Apple reports on future AR glasses.
The variety of hardware of Android XR enables various price points and applications, while visionos rely on a premium individual product. These strategies reflect the different market scenes: Apple focuses on a high quality, expensive device for Early Adopters, while Google is aiming for a wide ecosystem for different user segments.
Suitable for:
Why Google's Android XR Apple's Vision Pro could run the rank
The current market position of both platforms differs significantly in relation to availability and commercial penetration. The Apple Vision Pro has been available since February 2024, initially only in the USA, with a planned expansion to further markets. Despite technical innovations, the device is not considered a commercial hit, which is partly due to the high price and limited availability. Apple sees the Vision Pro as the basis for future AR glasses and continuously invests in the further development of Visionos.
Android XR is about to launch the market, with the first devices that are expected in 2025. The platform was announced in December 2024 and is currently in the developer preview. Google's strategy aims at an open ecosystem with various hardware partners, which could potentially enable a wider market acceptance. The integration of Gemini as a core feature could give Android XR an advantage in the AI-based user interaction.
The different market strategies reflect different visions for the future of spatial computing. Apple gradually sets evolution of its existing ecosystem strategy, while Google tries to democratize the product category per validated by Validated Pro with a more open, AI-centered approach. The coming years will show which approach proves to be more successful: Apple's premium integration or Google's open variety with strong AI integration.
Spatial computing: Which tech giant wins the race for mixed reality?
The comparison of Visionos and Android XR shows two fundamentally different approaches for the future of spatial computing. With its mature, closed platform, Visionos establishes a quality standard for spatial computing, while Android XR strives for a broader market penetration through openness, AI integration and hardware variety. Both systems will significantly shape the development of the XR industry, whereby their coexistence ultimately may lead to more diverse and more innovative solutions for consumers. The next few years will be decisive to determine which approach the adoption of spatial computing technologies will speed up and form the basis for the next generation of the human-computer interface.
Suitable for:
Your global marketing and business development partner
☑️ Our business language is English or German
☑️ NEW: Correspondence in your national language!
Konrad Wolfenstein
I would be happy to serve you and my team as a personal advisor.
You can contact me by filling out the contact form or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) . My email address is: wolfenstein ∂ xpert.digital
I'm looking forward to our joint project.
