Management advice | Critical consideration of Porsche Consulting: An analysis of current experience reports

Between image and reality: Insights to Porsche Consulting

The management consultancy Porsche Consulting enjoys a special reputation in the consulting landscape through its connection to the prestigious automobile manufacturer Porsche. But as with every company, there are two sides of the medal. While public reviews are often positive, there are quite critical voices on various aspects of the company. This analysis summarizes the essential criticisms that can be found in current reports and reviews.

Leadership culture under critical observation

A central point of criticism that appears in several sources affects the leadership culture at Porsche Consulting. The evaluation of a manager who speaks of a “toxic leadership culture” and particularly criticizes the management is particularly striking. The accusation weighs seriously: "Since 2024 there has been no longer any communication on the part of the management, which increasingly ensures uncertainty and frustration among employees".

study commissioned by Porsche Consulting . In a representative survey, carried out by the Forsa Institute, it was found that “every third employee was thinking about termination in the course of 2019 because he was dissatisfied with his boss”. Dr. Wolfgang Freibichler, partner at Porsche Consulting, commented on these results with the words: "Our survey makes it clear that the relationship between bosses and employees is often in a difficult imbalance". Ironically, this knowledge seems to be of your own company.

Discrepance between image and reality

A recurring topic in the ratings is the perceived discrepancy between the outer image and the internal reality of the company. "The image of Porsche Consulting to the outside remains positive, but the company is internally shaped by a toxic leadership culture, lack of communication [...]". This statement indicates a possible clapping of self -expression and actual internal conditions.

Internship experiences: from disappointment to sub -demand

The reviews of former interns are particularly critical. An assessment from 2023 describes an internship as “very, very disorganized and disappointing” and complains: “No communication, no plan for my internship, not even a specific task. You felt like a hot potato that nobody wants”.

This experience does not seem to be an isolated case. In another rating it says: "I did an internship there. The employees were very helpful and it was always friendly. However, I would have liked more tasks". A current intern reports on a platform that “a real project was only for 2.5 months” and one of them was “quite boring”.

Criticism of the onboarding process

Onboarding of new employees appears particularly problematic. A former intern describes a serious situation: "This started on the first day, on which I was completely forgotten by my superior manager and was not at all clear what my project and my role should be". The company's explanation - "It was vacation and we forgot about changing responsibilities" - does not throw good light on the organizational skills.

Project content and career prospects

There is also criticism of the type of projects carried out. A forum participant reports that “relatively large number of (approx. 50%) are any PMO projects in the VW Group”. This statement indicates a possibly one-sided orientation and strong dependence on the Volkswagen Group.

The career perspectives are also partially evaluated. It is spoken of “low promotion opportunities”, and a comparison with other consultations is not always advantageous. A forum contribution speaks of a “salary at the lower end of all T3 consultations with much worse reputation”, whereby other voices describe the remuneration as “competitive”.

Unequal division of work and salary differences

Another point of criticism is the unequal distribution of the workload. A manager complains: "The workload is unevenly distributed and there is a drop in salarys". This statement indicates structural problems in the organization of the company.

Internal structures and working atmosphere

The internal structures are described in several reviews as inefficient. There is talk of “inefficient internal structures” and “unnecessary reporting” that make work difficult. The proposal for improvement is "processes must be made more efficient to minimize political machinations and unnecessary reporting".

The working atmosphere is described as strongly depending on the team: "The working atmosphere varies greatly depending on the team: some teams maintain a pleasant and collegial environment, while in others the mood is rather tense". This inconsistency indicates different leadership styles within the company.

Industry -specific criticisms

Some of the criticisms mentioned are not necessarily specific to Porsche Consulting, but apply to the consulting industry in general. The “long working time” is mentioned as a disadvantage, with the addition “What is also normal for advice”. This relativizing remark shows that certain aspects are accepted as typical of the industry.

In discussions on market positioning, Porsche Consulting is sometimes not seen at the level of leading strategy. The company classifies a comment as “Tier 4”, comparable to the Big4 consultations. This classification is in contrast to other sources that Porsche Consulting “is one of the leading management consultations”.

A differentiated picture with light and shadow

The analysis of the criticisms of Porsche Consulting shows a multi -layered picture. While the company can score with the prestigious name Porsche and attractive benefits such as Porsche leasing, there is quite serious criticism of leadership culture, internal organization and project quality.

The discrepancy between positive public reviews and critical insider reports is particularly striking. Among other things, the proposal for improvement is: "Porsche Consulting should improve the management culture by changing the management and low performers are consistently tackled at all levels and can be canceled if necessary". This radical proposal indicates deeper structural problems.

For interested parties and applicants, it is advisable to take these criticisms into account when deciding on or against employment at Porsche Consulting and specifically ask for current developments in the criticized areas in the application process.