Open secret – suppressed, but not forgotten: Economics is 50 percent psychology – Image: Xpert.Digital
Open secret of the markets: Why emotions control the economy more than facts
### The forgotten law of economics: Why 50% is purely a matter of the mind ### The invisible power: How "animal spirits" really decide boom and crash ### Ludwig Erhard's brilliant insight, which is more relevant today than ever ### More than just numbers: The Nobel Prize that proved that economics is psychology ###
Greed, fear, herd instinct: How your brain controls your finances and thus the economy – and how you can outsmart it
"Economics is 50 percent psychology" – this famous saying, often attributed to Ludwig Erhard, is far more than a catchy phrase. It describes a fundamental truth that is often suppressed in boardrooms, on the stock exchanges, and in our everyday purchasing decisions, but never truly forgotten: Human behavior is not always rational, and it is precisely this irrationality that significantly shapes the markets.
While classical economic models often assume the coolly calculating "homo economicus," reality repeatedly proves the opposite. It is invisible forces such as fear, greed, optimism, and herd behavior—aptly called "animal spirits" by economists like John Maynard Keynes—that can determine booms and crashes. What was once an intuitive insight of economic leaders like Erhard or stock market expert André Kostolany is now scientifically substantiated by behavioral economics and has been honored with Nobel Prizes.
Here, we explore the profound connection between psychology and economics. We explore the origins of this insight, explain the key psychological mechanisms that guide our economic behavior, and demonstrate the practical implications for investors, companies, and consumers in the modern, digitally connected world. Understanding the psychology behind economics enables us to make better decisions and is less at the mercy of the whims of the markets.
50 percent of economics is psychology. Economics is a human activity, not a computer activity.
Why do experts repeatedly focus on the role of psychology in business?
The statement "economics is 50 percent psychology" is far more than just a catchy saying. It describes a fundamental insight into the functioning of economic processes, which is now confirmed by scientific research. The question of the psychological component of economics is so relevant because it explains why markets often behave irrationally and why purely mathematical or technical models are insufficient to explain economic phenomena.
People don't make economic decisions based solely on facts and figures; they are also strongly influenced by emotions, expectations, and unconscious thought patterns. These psychological factors can move entire markets and trigger economic cycles. The importance of this insight becomes particularly clear in times of crisis, when fear and panic, or conversely, excessive optimism, lead to extreme market movements.
Who coined the famous saying and how did it come about?
The saying "Economics is 50 percent psychology" is attributed to German Chancellor Ludwig Erhard, who is considered the father of the German economic miracle. As early as the 1950s and 1960s, Erhard recognized that economic developments are not determined solely by material factors such as production capacity or technological advances, but depend to a considerable extent on the subjective expectations, moods, and behaviors of economic actors.
This insight emerged from Erhard's practical experience as Minister of Economics and later as Chancellor. He observed how psychological factors such as confidence in the currency, optimism about the economic future, and the general consumer climate had a decisive influence on actual economic development. This formulation became a kind of leitmotif of his economic policy, which not only relied on hard economic data but also consciously aimed to influence economic psychology.
How did this view spread in business circles?
The idea that psychology plays a central role in business quickly resonated with other leading business figures. Alfred Herrhausen, who served as CEO of Deutsche Bank, took up Erhard's ideas and formulated them even more pointedly: "50 percent of business is psychology. Business is a human activity, not a computer activity." This statement underscored the human component of business processes at a time when computers and mathematical models were becoming increasingly important.
Herrhausen recognized that, despite all technological advances, people remain the driving force behind economic decisions. His emphasis on human factors was particularly relevant in the 1980s, when the financial world became increasingly mechanized. He warned against underestimating the emotional and psychological aspects of business decisions.
The spread of this mindset was also supported by practical stock market experience. André Kostolany, the legendary stock market expert, took this theory even further, claiming that the stock market is 90 percent psychology. His decades of observation of the financial markets confirmed that emotional factors such as greed and fear are often more important for price movements than fundamental company data.
What does this psychological component mean specifically?
The psychological component of economics manifests itself in various forms of human behavior that have a direct impact on economic processes. First, it concerns the role of emotions in economic decisions. People don't buy solely based on rational considerations; they are also strongly guided by emotions such as trust, fear, hope, or euphoria. These emotions influence both individual purchasing decisions and collective market movements.
Expectations play a central role in economic psychology. When consumers are optimistic about the future, they are more likely to consume and invest. Pessimistic expectations, on the other hand, lead to more cautious behavior, which in turn influences economic development. These self-fulfilling prophecies are an important mechanism through which psychological factors have real economic effects.
Cognitive biases represent another important aspect. People don't always make decisions rationally, but are subject to systematic thinking errors such as the availability heuristic or confirmation bias. These biases can lead to irrational market movements and explain why markets often deviate from rational valuations.
How did the scientific study of these phenomena develop?
Scientific research into the psychological aspects of business began as early as the early 1900s. Hugo Münsterberg, considered the father of business psychology, laid the foundation for an empirical approach to psychological factors in business with his 1912 work "Psychology and Economic Life." He recognized early on that psychological insights could and should find practical application in business.
The second wave of development was initiated in the 1950s by George Katona in the USA, who devoted himself to macroeconomic processes and investigated the importance of consumer confidence for overall economic development. Katona developed methods for measuring psychological factors such as consumer confidence and demonstrated their connection to economic indicators.
Since the 1980s, a branch of economic psychology has developed in German-speaking countries that increasingly uses social psychological insights to explain and predict economic behavior. This development led to the establishment of behavioral economics as an independent scientific discipline that integrates psychological insights into economic models.
What role does behavioral economics play in this context?
Behavioral economics, also known as behavioral economics, now provides the scientific foundation for the recognition that economics is, to a significant extent, psychological. This discipline systematically investigates how people actually make economic decisions, in contrast to the assumptions of traditional economic theories about rational actors.
Behavioral economics shows that people regularly deviate from the predictions of the "homo economicus" model, which always assumes rational and utility-maximizing behavior. Instead, people make decisions influenced by emotions, social norms, bounded rationality, and various cognitive biases.
Important insights from behavioral economics include phenomena such as loss aversion, in which people weight losses more heavily than gains of equal size, and the endowment effect, in which people value things they already own more highly. These findings have practical implications for areas such as product design, pricing strategies, and marketing communications.
The development of behavioral economics was significantly driven by researchers such as Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, who received the Nobel Prize for their work on Prospect Theory. Their research demonstrated that systematic "irrationalities" in human behavior are predictable and can be incorporated into economic models.
What is meant by “animal spirits” according to Keynes?
The term "animal spirits" was coined by British economist John Maynard Keynes in his 1936 work "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money" and describes the irrational elements in economic activity. Keynes used this term to explain why investment decisions are often not based on rational calculations but are driven by spontaneous optimism or pessimism.
Keynes defined animal spirits as "spontaneous optimism" and a "spontaneous impulse to action rather than inaction." He recognized that economic actors often cannot make their decisions based on a complete mathematical analysis because the future is uncertain. Instead, they rely on instincts, emotions, and gut feeling.
The concept of animal spirits explains why markets often react irrationally and why economic cycles are characterized by phases of euphoria and depression. In times of high animal spirits, companies invest more and consumers consume more, which stimulates the economy. In times of low animal spirits, the opposite occurs, which can lead to economic downturns.
The importance of animal spirits is particularly evident in financial crises, when sentiment quickly shifts from extreme optimism to deep fear. These emotional fluctuations can have economic repercussions far beyond what would be justified by fundamental data.
How does psychology manifest itself in different economic sectors?
The psychological component of economics is evident in virtually all sectors of the economy, but it is particularly evident in market psychology and consumer behavior. In financial markets, psychological factors lead to phenomena such as speculative bubbles and market crashes, which often have little to do with the fundamental values of the instruments traded.
In the area of consumption, psychology plays a central role in purchasing decisions. Consumers are influenced not only by rational factors such as price and quality, but also by emotional aspects, social norms, and unconscious associations. Consumer psychology systematically examines how these factors interact and how they can be exploited by companies.
In corporate management, the psychological component manifests itself in areas such as employee motivation, organizational culture, and leadership styles. Industrial and organizational psychology shows that productive work environments depend not only on technical and organizational factors, but also significantly on psychological aspects such as trust, recognition, and social integration.
Psychological considerations also play an important role in economic policy. Politicians consider not only the objective economic impacts in their decisions, but also the psychological effects of their measures on public confidence and general economic sentiment.
Our global industry and economic expertise in business development, sales and marketing
Our global industry and business expertise in business development, sales and marketing - Image: Xpert.Digital
Industry focus: B2B, digitalization (from AI to XR), mechanical engineering, logistics, renewable energies and industry
More about it here:
A topic hub with insights and expertise:
- Knowledge platform on the global and regional economy, innovation and industry-specific trends
- Collection of analyses, impulses and background information from our focus areas
- A place for expertise and information on current developments in business and technology
- Topic hub for companies that want to learn about markets, digitalization and industry innovations
Digitalization and herd behavior: How psychology shapes modern markets
Which indicators measure the psychological dimension of the economy?
To measure the psychological dimension of the economy, various indicators have been developed that capture the sentiment and confidence of various economic actors. Consumer confidence is one of the most important indicators in this area. In Germany, for example, the GfK Consumer Climate Index is regularly surveyed. It measures consumers' attitudes toward their financial situation, their purchasing intentions, and their expectations regarding economic development.
At the European level, there is the European Commission's Consumer Confidence Indicator, which makes consumer confidence comparable across EU countries. These indicators are based on representative surveys and measure both current consumer assessments and expectations for the next twelve months.
In addition to consumer confidence, there are also indicators for business confidence and investor confidence. These measure expectations and sentiment in various economic sectors and provide insight into planned investments and business decisions. The combination of various confidence indicators provides a comprehensive picture of the psychological state of an economy.
Psychological indicators such as the VIX index, which measures investor fear and uncertainty, are used in financial markets. Such indicators help understand irrational market movements and identify potential turning points in market trends.
How do cognitive biases influence economic decisions?
Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that can lead to suboptimal economic decisions. These biases arise from simplified information processing processes in the brain, which are helpful in many situations but can lead to errors in complex economic contexts.
The anchoring heuristic is one of the most common cognitive biases in economics. It causes people to overly focus on the first piece of information they receive and insufficiently adapt their subsequent assessments to new information. This can lead to suboptimal outcomes, for example, in price negotiations or investment decisions.
The availability heuristic causes people to judge the probability of events based on how easily they can recall similar cases. This can lead to inaccurate risk assessments if particularly spectacular or recent events distort perceptions.
Confirmation bias causes people to preferentially seek information that confirms their existing beliefs while ignoring or discounting contradictory information. In companies, this can lead to strategic errors if leaders miss warning signs or pursue incorrect strategies for too long.
What practical implications does this finding have for companies?
The realization that economics is, to a significant extent, psychological has far-reaching practical implications for companies in various sectors. In marketing, companies use psychological insights to market their products and services more successfully. This includes targeting emotional needs, leveraging social proof, and designing buying environments that trigger positive psychological responses.
In human resources management, insights from business psychology help motivate and retain employees. Companies are increasingly recognizing that monetary incentives alone are not enough; factors such as recognition, meaningful work, and social inclusion are also important. Today, the design of workplaces and organizational cultures increasingly takes psychological aspects into account.
When making strategic decisions, companies can make better decisions by becoming aware of cognitive biases. This includes implementing decision-making processes that reduce systematic thinking errors and creating a corporate culture that encourages critical thinking and diverse perspectives.
In risk management, psychological insights help avoid irrational decisions and achieve a more balanced assessment of opportunities and risks. This is especially important in volatile markets, where emotional reactions can lead to costly mistakes.
How has the importance of business psychology developed in modern business?
The importance of economic psychology in modern business has grown continuously, especially since the turn of the millennium. The accumulation of extreme economic events such as the New Economy boom, the dot-com crisis, the subprime mortgage crisis, and the banking crisis have shown that traditional economic models are insufficient to explain modern economic phenomena.
These crises highlighted the role of human emotions and rational thinking in economic processes. Greed, fear, exaggerated profit expectations, and inaccurate risk assessments emerged as key factors in economic instability. Traditional models, which assumed rational actors, could not explain these phenomena.
In today's world, characterized by digitalization and social media, the importance of psychological factors has continued to grow. Information spreads faster, emotional reactions are amplified, and herd behavior can spread more rapidly through digital networking. This makes understanding economic psychological mechanisms even more important for companies and policymakers.
The COVID-19 pandemic has once again underscored the relevance of economic psychology. The economic impact of the pandemic was due not only to objective restrictions but also to psychological factors such as uncertainty, fear, and changing consumer habits. The economic recovery also depends heavily on psychological factors such as consumer confidence and investor risk appetite.
What criticism is there of the overemphasis on psychological factors?
Although the importance of psychological factors in economics is widely recognized, there are also critical voices that warn against overemphasizing them. Some economists argue that focusing on psychological aspects could lead to the neglect of structural and material factors. They emphasize that real economic conditions such as productivity, resource availability, and technological progress ultimately determine long-term economic trends.
Critics also argue that the measurability of psychological factors is limited and that confidence indicators often have limited predictive power. While these indicators can provide important clues to current sentiment, their ability to predict future economic developments is controversial.
Another criticism concerns the potential for manipulation of psychological factors. If economic actors know that psychological factors are important, they might try to influence them to their advantage, which could lead to additional distortions. This raises ethical questions about the manipulation of consumer sentiment and market expectations.
Finally, some critics argue that the emphasis on psychological factors could lead to a deterministic understanding of human behavior that underestimates people's capacity for rational decision-making and learning from experience. They emphasize that people are perfectly capable of recognizing and correcting their cognitive biases.
How can economic actors deal with the psychological dimension?
Given the importance of psychological factors in business, the question arises as to how economic actors can constructively address this dimension. For companies, this first means developing an awareness of the role of psychological factors in their business processes. This includes both understanding their customers' behavior and reflecting on their own decision-making processes.
Implementing systematic decision-making processes can help reduce cognitive biases. This includes methods such as incorporating diverse perspectives into decision-making bodies, systematically searching for conflicting information, and regularly reviewing assumptions and strategies. Companies can also employ external consultants or "devil's advocates" to avoid groupthink.
It is important for investors and financial market participants to understand and control their own emotional reactions. This can be achieved through disciplined investment strategies, diversified portfolios, and avoiding emotion-driven decisions. Awareness of one's own cognitive biases can help avoid systematic errors.
Policymakers can leverage the psychological dimension to design more effective economic policies. This includes both communicating their policies and considering psychological effects in policymaking. Trustful and consistent communication can help build trust in economic policy and achieve the desired psychological effects.
What future prospects arise from this insight?
The realization that economics is, to a significant extent, psychological opens up various future perspectives for the further development of economics and economic practice. Researchers can expect to further integrate psychological methods and insights into economic models. Behavioral economics is expected to continue to gain importance and open up new areas of application.
Digitalization offers new opportunities for capturing and analyzing psychological factors in business. Big data analytics can help capture behavioral patterns and moods in real time and use them for business decisions. Artificial intelligence could help detect and predict complex psychological patterns.
In corporate practice, further professionalization of the handling of psychological factors is to be expected. This includes the development of better tools and methods as well as the training of managers and decision-makers in business psychology skills. Companies are expected to invest more heavily in the psychological analysis of their customers and employees.
Regulation could also take psychological insights more into account. Behavioral finance and behavioral economics could lead to new approaches to financial market regulation that take into account the actual behavioral patterns of market participants. This could lead to more effective regulatory measures that incorporate both rational and irrational aspects of human behavior.
The significance for the future
The realization that economics is 50 percent psychology has evolved from an intuitive understanding of successful practitioners like Ludwig Erhard into a scientifically sound fact. Modern behavioral economics confirms what business leaders have long suspected: human emotions, expectations, and cognitive biases play a central role in economic processes.
This finding has far-reaching implications for all areas of business. Companies that understand and consider the psychological aspects of their business activities can make better decisions, engage their customers more successfully, and manage their employees more effectively. Investors who are aware of their own psychological weaknesses can make more rational investment decisions. Policymakers who consider psychological factors can create more effective economic policies.
At the same time, it's important not to overestimate the psychological dimension and not to neglect structural and material factors. The future likely lies in a balanced approach that considers both rational and emotional aspects of human behavior. The continuous development of business psychology and its practical application will be crucial to how well we can overcome economic challenges in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.
The statement “economics is 50 percent psychology” thus remains not only a historically interesting quote, but also a lastingly relevant insight for understanding and shaping economic processes in the modern world.
Your global marketing and business development partner
☑️ Our business language is English or German
☑️ NEW: Correspondence in your national language!
Konrad Wolfenstein
I would be happy to serve you and my team as a personal advisor.
You can contact me by filling out the contact form or simply call me on +49 89 89 674 804 (Munich) . My email address is: wolfenstein ∂ xpert.digital
I'm looking forward to our joint project.
