Opinion and discussion contribution: Community Notes instead of fact-checking – involving users with different perspectives – Image: Xpert.Digital
Meta and X: How the new community moderation model is changing the platforms
Meta is watching X: Why the Community Notes system is replacing traditional fact checks
The announcement that Meta (the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads) plans to introduce a new "Community Notes" system has sparked widespread discussion. This system aims to moderate content shared on the platforms through active participation from the user community, replacing traditional fact-checking. Interestingly, Meta is basing its approach on a similar model already in use on Elon Musk's platform X (formerly Twitter). However, there is a key difference: Meta's Community Notes will not be applied to paid ads, but exclusively to organic posts. This approach and its potential consequences raise numerous questions that extend beyond the purely moderation aspect. Below you will find a detailed explanation of the concept, its background, how it works, and the opportunities and challenges associated with its introduction.
Suitable for:
- Meta is doing what X is doing: 'Community Notes' are replacing 'fact-checking' – but there's a catch
1. Background and motivation for “Community Notes”
From fact-checking to community-based approaches
For years, Meta has faced increasing accusations that disinformation, fake news, and misleading content are widely disseminated via its platforms. "Fact-checking" by external organizations has long been a key tool for combating this problem. However, the use of such fact-checking has often led to controversy in the past. Criticism has primarily focused on the fact that these organizations are not always impartial or that they prioritize certain topics while neglecting others. Furthermore, these centralized mechanisms have been unable to fully address the immense volume of content on the platforms.
“Community Notes” therefore represent a new approach to placing more responsibility for content moderation and evaluation in the hands of the user community. Meta hopes this will lead to broader acceptance and a faster assessment of whether content is potentially problematic or misleading. In Meta's words: “We want to build more strongly on our roots of free speech and empower people on our platforms with greater personal responsibility.”
Inspiration from X (formerly Twitter)
It's no coincidence that Meta's "Community Notes" strongly resemble the existing system on X. Elon Musk had already announced during the acquisition of Twitter that he wanted to reduce centralized control over content. Instead, users were to be more involved in the process of identifying and flagging questionable content. "We want people to contribute their different perspectives and thus collectively create more transparency," was one of the early statements in this regard.
Even though the specific technical details differ, the basic principle is similar: Users rate posts and mark them as helpful, ambiguous, or misleading according to shared criteria. Meta's system, however, bears the same name – “Community Notes” – and relies on comparable rating mechanisms. This ensures a certain degree of familiarity, but also raises the question of whether Meta is simply copying an already established concept or whether genuine innovation can be expected.
A departure from traditional fact-checking
Until now, Meta in the US used various fact-checking partners who reviewed and analyzed suspicious content. However, this model increasingly reached its limits: With rapidly growing trends on social media, traditional fact-checking organizations often had a delayed response. Furthermore, the acceptance of external review organizations was not particularly high among some users, as their neutrality was questioned. From a business perspective, the model was also costly, requiring regular coordination with partners and significant financial resources.
With “Community Notes,” Meta aims to operate more cost-effectively and cover a broad spectrum of contributions by encouraging its user base to participate. At the same time, users are obligated to actively engage with content instead of simply accepting someone else's rating. According to Meta, this shift in perspective promises greater overall credibility and stronger community involvement.
2. What exactly are “Community Notes”?
Basic principle
“Community Notes” are short explanations, annotations, or corrections created by platform members when they feel a post is misleading or requires additional background information. These can range from simple clarifications, such as: “This post contains figures that have been refuted in more recent studies,” to more in-depth information, for example: “This post may be outdated due to new developments.”
The idea is that multiple users can independently formulate their assessments. Other community members then rate these comments as "helpful" or "not helpful." A comment that receives particularly strong and diverse support from various user groups is ultimately given visibility directly below the post in question. This creates a kind of decentralized, collaborative fact-checking process that is not controlled by a single institution.
Different perspectives and consensus building
A key feature of the “Community Notes” is their deliberate attempt to include users with diverse perspectives. Meta hopes that this approach will lead to a consensus that is not limited to a specific “echo chamber”.
In the past, divisions have repeatedly emerged between different user groups, leading to politically or ideologically charged disputes. “Community Notes” aim to partially bridge these divides using an algorithmic system by prominently highlighting only those comments that receive positive feedback from a broad range of users.
This approach aims to reduce the risk of one side maintaining the dominant interpretation of certain topics. However, it remains unclear to what extent cultural or linguistic differences are taken into account. Especially on globally operating platforms like Facebook and Instagram, the perception of a post could vary significantly depending on the region.
Distinction from paid advertisements
The fact that “Community Notes” are not intended to be used for paid advertising is currently generating a lot of attention. “We want Community Notes to complement organic content, not influence the advertising industry,” Meta stated.
This distinction has drawn criticism, as many see advertisements and sponsored posts as a major driver of potential deception. Brands, lobby groups, and political actors could continue to place ads unhindered, without decentralized review by the community. This raises the question of how transparent or comprehensive the model is if essential areas of the platforms are excluded.
3. The rollout schedule and the platforms
Planned launch in the USA
According to Meta, “Community Notes” will initially be tested in the US. This test period is expected to last several months before a possible rollout to other countries. The company emphasizes that adjustments may still be made during this test phase, depending on user feedback and any technical challenges that arise.
The decision to launch in the US is understandable. Firstly, Meta has its largest market there, and secondly, political and social debates in the US are particularly heated. The company hopes to gain as much insight as possible from this highly polarized environment in order to optimize the system for other countries in later phases.
Facebook, Instagram and Threads
Meta intends to integrate “Community Notes” into Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. This will allow the company to cover a large portion of the global social media market. Threads, in particular, the relatively young network, could benefit from this in solidifying its reputation for innovation.
Facebook, with its billions of users, anticipates broad applicability of the system. A wealth of diverse content formats are shared there, ranging from personal updates and news stories to political campaigns. Instagram, on the other hand, is heavily image- and video-based; adding annotations to visual content could open up new avenues for critically engaging with images.
Integration and user-friendliness
One of the key factors for the success of “Community Notes” is its integration with the respective platform. If users have to take extra steps to read or submit comments, this could significantly reduce participation. Meta therefore plans to make the process as seamless as possible: a single click or tap should be all it takes to add or rate a note.
Furthermore, users who have already interacted with a post will receive a notification as soon as a "Community Note" is published. This ensures that corrections or contextual information don't go unnoticed. The challenge lies in not overwhelming users. A flood of notifications can quickly lead to them simply being ignored.
4. Organic contributions versus paid advertising
Why this distinction?
“Community Notes” will be introduced exclusively for organic content, meaning posts whose distribution is not financially supported. Meta justifies this by stating that paid advertisements are already subject to strict internal controls before publication. Furthermore, mechanisms already exist to label advertising.
Critics point out, however, that consistent community engagement would also be beneficial in the advertising environment. Advertisements often reach an extremely wide audience, and if they contain misinformation, the damage can be correspondingly severe. There are concerns that companies or political actors might deliberately resort to advertising to protect themselves from critical comments from the community.
Impact on brands and influencers
One particularly interesting aspect concerns brand communication and influencers. While many influencers don't run traditional ads, they do post sponsored content, product placements, or paid collaborations. Whether these types of posts are considered "organic" or fall into the category of "paid content" isn't always clear.
This could create a gray area where certain posts have a promotional character but are not officially classified as advertisements and are therefore subject to "Community Notes." This will likely lead to discussions about how such content should be correctly labeled and handled. It is currently unknown whether Meta will establish clear guidelines in this regard.
Discussion in the advertising industry
Advertising circles are already buzzing with debate about whether the introduction of "Community Notes" necessitates new strategies. It could become more challenging for companies to present their brand in a controlled environment if users unexpectedly add comments on products, statements, or campaigns. This could lead to an entirely new dynamic where a brand's image is shaped not only by official communication but also by the collective opinion of the community.
At the same time, brands that operate very transparently and foster an open culture of discussion could benefit from "Community Notes." By allowing factual corrections or providing additional information, they can gain credibility. Interestingly, younger target groups in particular often value authenticity and are more likely to identify with brands that respond credibly to criticism.
5. Political content and long-term strategy
The role of political communication
Political actors are increasingly using social media as their primary platform to disseminate their messages. In election campaigns, paid advertisements and organic posts play an equally important role. Meta's decision not to apply "Community Notes" to political advertisements therefore has consequences for political discourse.
Opponents of "Community Notes" in a political context fear that key disinformation tactics will remain effective through advertising. Proponents, on the other hand, see it as a positive development that organic debates could foster a more open climate where questionable statements are quickly contextualized or refuted by the community. However, it remains questionable how effective "Community Notes" are against highly professional and well-funded disinformation campaigns that rely on advertising.
Major restructuring in the handling of content
The introduction of “Community Notes” is part of a larger restructuring of content management. Meta has been experimenting for some time with new formats, algorithms, and guidelines that control the visibility of posts. This includes efforts to reduce the overall prevalence of political content and place a greater focus on personal interactions.
“We are trying to make social networks more social again by putting family and friends front and center,” commented a Meta spokesperson. This trend could mean that political actors and media partners will have to find new ways to achieve the same reach as before.
Long-term consequences for users
From a user's perspective, the introduction of "Community Notes" can be viewed very differently depending on individual usage patterns. Those who primarily use the platforms for private purposes might welcome the new feature, as it promises greater transparency and context. However, those who mainly interact with political or controversial content should be prepared for a more complex debate culture.
The responsibility of individual users also increases, as anyone can influence public perception of a topic with a small comment. The same applies in reverse: those who make unfounded or biased comments risk being labeled "unhelpful" by the rest of the community.
6. How “Community Notes” works in detail
Creating Notes
To write a “Community Note”, users must meet certain requirements. These often include a minimum account age, a good interaction history without recent rule violations, and in some cases, a willingness to participate in an introductory program.
Once these hurdles are overcome, users can create notes by selecting the corresponding option below a post. The note text is usually limited to a certain number of characters to keep it concise. Lengthy discussions are not intended, as they could impair readability.
Community rating
Once a grade has been written, it is initially not visible to the public but is listed internally. Other people who also have the right to create grades can then provide feedback. They rate the grade as "helpful" or "not helpful," often with a short comment explaining their decision.
The real innovation lies in the system's reliance on a diverse cross-section of ratings. A rating that is only considered positive by a very homogeneous group of users may not be published. Only when users with differing viewpoints agree with the content does the likelihood increase that the rating will appear prominently under the post. This is intended to prevent ideological groups from systematically upvoting ratings and manipulating the platform to their advantage.
Publication and notifications
If a rating is deemed helpful by enough different users, it appears below the post. A small icon or special marker may also indicate that the post has received a "Community Note." Users who have liked, commented on, or shared the post may be notified that a new rating is available, giving them the opportunity to reconsider their initial assessment.
Meta hopes this will lead to self-regulation: Anyone who shares a misleading post could later receive a notification that new contextual information is available, and might then retract or correct their post. Whether this proves effective in practice remains to be seen.
Anonymity and protection of participants
One of the sensitive issues is the protection of users who write notes. "Community Notes" are published anonymously, so it's not possible to directly identify the person behind a particular comment. This has the advantage of making reprisals or personal attacks against the note's author more difficult.
However, anonymity also carries the risk that individuals might be tempted to make rash or offensive statements. The rating system addresses this by not even approving many such notes if they are not constructive or do not provide trustworthy information. In the long run, a core group of dedicated users could emerge who enjoy a good reputation within the community and whose notes would therefore be given more weight.
Continuous improvement
Meta plans to continuously expand “Community Notes”. Feedback loops, where users can provide feedback on missing functionalities or overly complicated aspects, will be continuously evaluated. The algorithms that determine which notes are visible to the general public can also be adjusted.
It's conceivable that multimedia annotations will be possible in the future, such as short videos or images illustrating a point. Meta could also integrate tools to assist with research, for example, an automatic keyword search in reliable information sources. However, whether and when such features become a reality depends on numerous factors, including data protection regulations and technical feasibility.
7. Opportunities and benefits of “Community Notes”
Decentralization and breadth
A key advantage lies in its decentralization. While traditional fact-checking is typically carried out by a small team or organization, "community notes" can potentially involve millions of people. This allows for significantly broader coverage of posts on the platforms.
Broad participation ensures that a wide range of perspectives are taken into account. This can lead to a more balanced approach, as the evaluation is not dependent on a single gatekeeper. Especially in times of growing distrust of central authorities, this could send an important signal for greater openness and participation.
Speed and up-to-dateness
Social media is fast-paced. Trends often come and go within hours or days. A centralized fact-checking system frequently can't keep up. "Community Notes," on the other hand, benefit from the collective responsiveness of many users. When a tweet, post, or image goes viral, a multitude of comments can be quickly created and evaluated, provided enough active contributors are online.
This speed aspect is crucial, especially with breaking news or rapidly spreading misinformation. A timely community note could prevent many users from further spreading the misinformation by providing context or pointing out inconsistencies.
Promoting media literacy
An important aspect is the promotion of media literacy. When people actively participate in "Community Notes," they inevitably engage with the content, its credibility, and the research of facts. They learn why certain claims are dubious and what indicators might point to manipulation.
This learning effect can have a positive impact on the overall level of discussion culture. As users learn to ask more critical questions and contribute well-founded arguments, the overall quality of contributions on the platforms increases. Even those who don't write notes themselves, but read the debates and thereby develop a better understanding, benefit from this.
8. Challenges and Criticism
Manipulation and trolls
A decentralized approach is also vulnerable to manipulation. Organized groups could attempt to undermine the system by colluding and systematically upgrading or downgrading posts or notes. If these groups are large enough or employ sophisticated strategies, they could gain influence that leads to distortion.
Meta intends to address this problem with algorithms designed to detect suspicious coordinated actions. Furthermore, a certain degree of heterogeneity in the ratings (different interests, backgrounds, political leanings) might be necessary for a rating to even be visible. Whether this will be sufficient to prevent troll armies and "brigading" remains an open question.
Lack of professional examination
Critics argue that "Community Notes" offer no guarantee of factual accuracy. While professional fact-checkers have journalistic training and often work with rigorous methodology, anyone can contribute to Community Notes, provided they meet certain basic requirements. This raises concerns that falsehoods could become established as the "majority opinion" if enough users find them plausible.
For this reason, Meta itself warns against considering "Community Notes" as the sole source of truth. "We see ourselves as a platform that facilitates discourse, but we do not offer any guarantees regarding content," is a gist of the company's statement. Therefore, for complex topics requiring specialized expertise, it remains questionable how reliable a broad vote can be.
Borderless platforms versus local context
Meta operates globally. One and the same topic can be assessed differently in different countries, whether due to cultural differences or varying legal frameworks. If “Community Notes” are rolled out internationally, this could lead to confusion because some users might consider certain content harmless, while others view it as problematic.
The language barrier is another factor: Community Notes in one language are hardly usable for people who don't speak that language. Automatic translations can also lead to misunderstandings. Therefore, ensuring that the system functions smoothly worldwide and enables fair reviews will be a challenge.
Reduced control over brand messages
Brands and companies are accustomed to largely controlling their own communication. With "Community Notes," an additional layer is introduced that can contextualize or correct a company's statements. This can have positive effects by creating more transparency and clearing up misunderstandings more quickly. However, it also increases the risk of disrupting communication strategies.
Especially in crisis situations, a brand already under scrutiny can quickly find itself flooded with critical comments on its posts. This directly impacts public perception, leaving the company with little time to react. Therefore, professional crisis management can no longer rely solely on press releases or company statements, but must also consider the dynamics of community comments.
9. Outlook and possible developments
Expansion to other countries
Should the tests in the US prove successful, Meta plans to make "Community Notes" available in other regions. However, the rollout in Europe could be more complex, as stricter data protection regulations apply here, and Meta is under the watchful eye of European regulatory authorities. Even now, companies must carefully review every major update to their content moderation mechanisms to ensure compliance with national and EU regulations.
Cooperation with governments and institutions
It is conceivable that Meta will cooperate with public institutions or universities in the long term to refine “Community Notes.” For example, universities could provide background information on specific topics to help users evaluate posts. Official authorities could also use interfaces to provide real-time alerts about misinformation.
However, this creates a tension with the fundamental idea of decentralization. Too close a cooperation with government agencies or institutions could give the impression that the system is being controlled from above. The challenge will be to find a balance between professional input and the self-governing community.
Technological innovations and AI
Another area of development could be the increased use of artificial intelligence. Social networks already use algorithms to identify problematic content. In the future, AI systems could analyze community notes and support users in creating them. For example, AI could suggest relevant sources or even automatically provide an initial assessment of a post's credibility.
However, concerns exist here as well. AI could make mistakes, be biased, or rely too heavily on certain datasets. Therefore, it will remain crucial that human judgment takes precedence and that artificial intelligence primarily serves an assistive role.
Sustainable change in the culture of discussion
Ultimately, “Community Notes” could help change the way we communicate via social media. Instead of passively consuming content, users are encouraged to reflect critically and actively participate. This shift from mere consumers to co-creators could have a positive effect on the culture of discussion.
Whether the system will actually become permanently established and whether users will adopt it sufficiently remains to be seen. Much will depend on how Meta handles cases of abuse, how the company designs the user-friendliness, and what incentives are created to encourage enough people to participate. If a fair and transparent process can be established, “Community Notes” could become a core component of many social networks in the future.
The planned introduction of “Community Notes” at Meta marks a turning point in the social media landscape
Meta is taking a bold step by moving away from traditional, centralized fact-checking towards decentralized, community-based moderation. “Community Notes” are intended to increase transparency, curb the spread of misinformation, and give users the opportunity to actively contribute to the quality of content.
The fact that this system is not applied to paid advertisements is causing controversy. Critics fear that there is a great need for additional control precisely in this area. Brands, influencers, and advertisers are observing these developments with mixed feelings, as the line between organic and sponsored content is sometimes blurred. Political actors and interest groups, on the other hand, see "community notes" as another tool that could change their scope of action on social media platforms—in which direction remains to be seen.
Technically, “Community Notes” offers an exciting combination of crowdsourcing, algorithmic evaluation, and anonymity. However, questions arise as to how resistant the system is to manipulation and whether it delivers reliable results in highly sensitive areas. Particularly with complex issues requiring extensive research, a certain risk remains that the majority opinion does not necessarily reflect the facts.
Nevertheless, “Community Notes” offer great potential for a more vibrant, transparent, and participatory communication culture. If the systems can be continuously improved and a balance struck between community participation and quality assurance, this could be an important step toward strengthening the credibility of content on social media. Furthermore, users can develop their media literacy in this way, which would ultimately benefit society as a whole.
For Meta, “Community Notes” is not just a test, but potentially a blueprint for future social media features. Other platforms will be closely watching the development and may adopt similar or expanded concepts. Ultimately, the question will be whether the general user base embraces this form of collective content moderation or whether the desire for professional, verified information remains stronger.
In a digitized world where every post can be shared millions of times within seconds, a new understanding of responsibility is needed. “Community Notes” can help distribute responsibility across many shoulders, thus striking a balance between freedom of expression and protection from disinformation. The project is still in its early stages, but the coming months and years will show whether it can live up to the high expectations.
With the introduction of “Community Notes,” Meta is embarking on a path that has the potential to fundamentally change the relationship between platform operators, users, advertisers, and political actors. Whether this path ultimately leads to a fairer and more truthful culture of discussion depends largely on the users themselves. One thing is clear: social media is entering a new phase in which collaborative moderation could become a crucial pillar of digital interaction.
Suitable for: